Rawhide Orphanarium Purged

[Warren Togami]

aasaver
AGReader
freenx
gnome-applet-tvn24
gnome-ppp
kbiof
lipstik
man-pages-da
MegaMek
nautilus-share
sinjdoc
system-summary
system-switch-java
xeuphoric

These packages have been removed from rawhide.  Please let rel-eng know 
if you want to revive a retired package.

moodss
moomps

These packages are newly orphans in the last week.  If they are not 
claimed soon they may be removed before F10 beta.

Warren Togami
wtogami(a)redhat.com

[itamar]

freenx is cool.

there are a way to do anything about freenx


Warren Togami wrote:
>  aasaver
>  AGReader
>  freenx
>  gnome-applet-tvn24
>  gnome-ppp
>  kbiof
>  lipstik
>  man-pages-da
>  MegaMek
>  nautilus-share
>  sinjdoc
>  system-summary
>  system-switch-java
>  xeuphoric
>
>  These packages have been removed from rawhide.  Please let rel-eng 
>  know if you want to revive a retired package.
>
>  moodss
>  moomps
>
>  These packages are newly orphans in the last week.  If they are not 
>  claimed soon they may be removed before F10 beta.
>
>  Warren Togami
>  wtogami(a)redhat.com
>

[Joseph Harnish]

See:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg01062.html

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Itamar - IspBrasil
<itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br&gt; wrote:
>  freenx is cool.
>
>  there are a way to do anything about freenx
>
>
>  Warren Togami wrote:
> >
> > aasaver
> > AGReader
> > freenx
> > gnome-applet-tvn24
> > gnome-ppp
> > kbiof
> > lipstik
> > man-pages-da
> > MegaMek
> > nautilus-share
> > sinjdoc
> > system-summary
> > system-switch-java
> > xeuphoric
> >
> > These packages have been removed from rawhide.  Please let rel-eng know if
> > you want to revive a retired package.
> >
> > moodss
> > moomps
> >
> > These packages are newly orphans in the last week.  If they are not
> > claimed soon they may be removed before F10 beta.
> >
> > Warren Togami
> > wtogami(a)redhat.com
> >
>
>
>  --
>  fedora-devel-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

[Bill Crawford]

2008/7/25 Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com&gt;:

>  lipstik 
Anyone have any idea how much work would be involved in porting this to KDE4?

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Friday 25 July 2008, Warren Togami wrote:

>  sinjdoc 
With the removal of sinjdoc gcj now requires openjdk
for javadoc.  due to a 
bug its been that way at buildtime for awhile now.  but sinjdoc was a Requires 
and worked for runtime javadoc needs.  but now the only javadoc parser is in 
openjdk.  IMO  this is bad.  



-- 
Dennis Gilmore

[Warren Togami]

Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>  On Friday 25 July 2008, Warren Togami wrote:
>  
> > sinjdoc
>  With the removal of sinjdoc gcj now requires openjdk for javadoc.  due to a 
>  bug its been that way at buildtime for awhile now.  but sinjdoc was a Requires 
>  and worked for runtime javadoc needs.  but now the only javadoc parser is in 
>  openjdk.  IMO  this is bad.  
>   
This was on the orphan list with repeated warnings for weeks.  I'll 
unblock it now, but someone really needs to take ownership if it is 
important.

Warren Togami
wtogami(a)redhat.com

[Deepak Bhole]

* Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com&gt; [2008-07-25 15:09]:
>  Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Friday 25 July 2008, Warren Togami wrote:
> >
> >> sinjdoc
> > With the removal of sinjdoc gcj now requires openjdk for javadoc.  due to 
> > a bug its been that way at buildtime for awhile now.  but sinjdoc was a 
> > Requires and worked for runtime javadoc needs.  but now the only javadoc 
> > parser is in openjdk.  IMO  this is bad.  
>
>  This was on the orphan list with repeated warnings for weeks.  I'll unblock 
>  it now, but someone really needs to take ownership if it is important.
>  
Done. I am now the owner of sinjdoc.

Deepak

>  Warren Togami
>  wtogami(a)redhat.com
>
>  -- 
>  fedora-devel-list mailing list
>  fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:45:39 -0500
Dennis Gilmore <dennis(a)ausil.us&gt; wrote:

>  On Friday 25 July 2008, Warren Togami wrote:
>  
>  > sinjdoc
>  With the removal of sinjdoc gcj now requires openjdk for javadoc.  due to a 
>  bug its been that way at buildtime for awhile now.  but sinjdoc was a Requires 
>  and worked for runtime javadoc needs.  but now the only javadoc parser is in 
>  openjdk.  IMO  this is bad.   
Why is that bad?

josh

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:44 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:

>  nautilus-share 
The purpose of this tool is to make it easier to share folders with
windows clients (using Samba) - users get the ability to share their own
folders.  

It is sad to see it so unloved, but it really needs to be part of the
default configuration of the Samba deamon (as having to edit the
smb.conf is the part it was trying to avoid).

It would be nice to see a Fedora owner for it again some day, them maybe
Samba won't be the target of the linux-hater as much :-)

http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/of-silos-and-samba.html

(I think this tool got written when SuSE was working really hard on
making this stuff 'just work' for their distribution). 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com

[Bastien Nocera]

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:30 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>  On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:44 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
>  
>  > nautilus-share
>  
>  The purpose of this tool is to make it easier to share folders with
>  windows clients (using Samba) - users get the ability to share their own
>  folders.  
>  
>  It is sad to see it so unloved, but it really needs to be part of the
>  default configuration of the Samba deamon (as having to edit the
>  smb.conf is the part it was trying to avoid).
>  
>  It would be nice to see a Fedora owner for it again some day, them maybe
>  Samba won't be the target of the linux-hater as much :-)
>  
>  http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/of-silos-and-samba.html
>  
>  (I think this tool got written when SuSE was working really hard on
>  making this stuff 'just work' for their distribution).  
The problem is that the implementation is broken in a number of ways.

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 18:39 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>  On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 10:30 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>  > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 11:44 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
>  > 
>  > > nautilus-share
>  > 
>  > The purpose of this tool is to make it easier to share folders with
>  > windows clients (using Samba) - users get the ability to share their own
>  > folders.  
>  > 
>  > It is sad to see it so unloved, but it really needs to be part of the
>  > default configuration of the Samba deamon (as having to edit the
>  > smb.conf is the part it was trying to avoid).
>  > 
>  > It would be nice to see a Fedora owner for it again some day, them maybe
>  > Samba won't be the target of the linux-hater as much :-)
>  > 
>  > http://linuxhaters.blogspot.com/2008/07/of-silos-and-samba.html
>  > 
>  > (I think this tool got written when SuSE was working really hard on
>  > making this stuff 'just work' for their distribution). 
>  
>  The problem is that the implementation is broken in a number of ways. 
Such as?  I've never had reason to use it myself...

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.