Script to update release and changelog?

[Orion Poplawski]

Is there a script posted somewhere for automatically bumping the release
and adding a line to %changelog?  Perhaps we could get integrated into
Makefile.common?

make bumprel COMMENT="Rebuild for gcc 4.3"

- Orion

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:10:11 -0700 (MST), orion(a)cora.nwra.com wrote:

>  Is there a script posted somewhere for automatically bumping the
> release
>  and adding a line to %changelog?  Perhaps we could get integrated into
>  Makefile.common?
>  
>  make bumprel COMMENT="Rebuild for gcc 4.3" 
I use these two:

  http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py 
  http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py 

The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry.
The second one can be used to fully automate bump'n'rebuilds like

  rebuildrpms.py foo bar more-rpm-names-here

Both still need configuration of constants at the top. They have been
used before to mass-rebuild FE (that's why bumpspecfile.py is different
from the original that's floating around).

[Rahul Sundaram]

Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:10:11 -0700 (MST), orion(a)cora.nwra.com wrote:
>  
> > Is there a script posted somewhere for automatically bumping the release
> > and adding a line to %changelog?  Perhaps we could get integrated into
> > Makefile.common?
> >
> > make bumprel COMMENT="Rebuild for gcc 4.3"
>  
>  I use these two:
>  
>    http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py 
>    http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py 
>  
>  The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry. 
That's neat. Could this functionality be integrated with the common make 
files?

Rahul

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:24:40 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>  Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:10:11 -0700 (MST), orion cora nwra com wrote:
>  > 
>  >> Is there a script posted somewhere for automatically bumping the release
>  >> and adding a line to %changelog?  Perhaps we could get integrated into
>  >> Makefile.common?
>  >>
>  >> make bumprel COMMENT="Rebuild for gcc 4.3"
>  > 
>  > I use these two:
>  > 
>  >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py 
>  >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py 
>  > 
>  > The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry.
>  
>  That's neat. Could this functionality be integrated with the common make 
>  files? 
For that, a few things aren't ready:

 * Which email address to use? Grab one from ~/.koji/client.crt as
   a default?

 * Override default config values with ENV variables as in above
   example.

 * Improve bumpspecfile.py so it doesn't alter whitespace in "Release"
   tag.

 * Improve bumpspecfile.py so it adds EVR-without-%{?dist} to
   changelog entry. (Redundant for the most recent package release,
   but some people want it nevertheless.)

It could as well be included with "rpmdevtools" after deciding on
whether to use a configuration file and/or a set of options.

Further, rel-eng uses some scripts for automated rebuilds, too.
Where are those?

[Ville Skyttä]

On Saturday 09 February 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:

>    http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py
>    http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py
>
>  The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry. 
Here's a simpler one that additionally adds a version to the changelog entry, 
but "suffers" from a dependency on Emacs:

http://scop.fedorapeople.org/scripts/bumpspec.sh

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:59:01 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:

>  On Saturday 09 February 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  
>  >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py
>  >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py
>  >
>  > The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry.
>  
>  Here's a simpler one that additionally adds a version to the changelog entry, 
>  but "suffers" from a dependency on Emacs:
>  
>  http://scop.fedorapeople.org/scripts/bumpspec.sh 
It increases 0.1%{?dist} to 1.1%{?dist} whereas the less simple script
bumps it to 0.2%{?dist} as it ought to be. ;o)

[Ville Skyttä]

On Saturday 09 February 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 22:59:01 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>  > On Saturday 09 February 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  > >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py
>  > >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py
>  > >
>  > > The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog
>  > > entry.
>  >
>  > Here's a simpler one that additionally adds a version to the changelog
>  > entry, but "suffers" from a dependency on Emacs:
>  >
>  > http://scop.fedorapeople.org/scripts/bumpspec.sh
>
>  It increases 0.1%{?dist} to 1.1%{?dist} whereas the less simple script
>  bumps it to 0.2%{?dist} as it ought to be. ;o) 
Yes, that's documented in the script's "caveats" section.

(And BTW, that's a limitation of rpm-spec-mode.el, not the script ;))

[Ville Skyttä]

On Saturday 09 February 2008, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>  On Saturday 09 February 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
>  > It increases 0.1%{?dist} to 1.1%{?dist} whereas the less simple script
>  > bumps it to 0.2%{?dist} as it ought to be. ;o)
>
>  Yes, that's documented in the script's "caveats" section.
>
>  (And BTW, that's a limitation of rpm-spec-mode.el, not the script ;)) 
Heh, I just couldn't live with that, it's fixed now in rpm-spec-mode.el 
0.12.1x in XEmacs CVS.  RFE asking for it to be included in F9 emacs is 
#432209

[Michael Schwendt]

On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:45:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:

>    http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py 
>    http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py 
>  
>  The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry.
>  The second one can be used to fully automate bump'n'rebuilds like
>  
>    rebuildrpms.py foo bar more-rpm-names-here
>  
>  Both still need configuration of constants at the top. They have been
>  used before to mass-rebuild FE (that's why bumpspecfile.py is different
>  from the original that's floating around). 
bumpspecfile.py now retains whitespace around the release value.

[Thorsten Leemhuis]

On 11.02.2008 15:56, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>  On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 19:45:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/bumpspecfile.py 
> >   http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/rebuildrpms.py 
> > The first one only modifies given spec files and adds a changelog entry.
> > The second one can be used to fully automate bump'n'rebuilds like
> >   rebuildrpms.py foo bar more-rpm-names-here
> > Both still need configuration of constants at the top. They have been
> > used before to mass-rebuild FE (that's why bumpspecfile.py is different
> > from the original that's floating around).
>  
>  bumpspecfile.py now retains whitespace around the release value. 
Hmmm.

http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rebuild-scripts/bumpspecfile.py?root...
[...]
Fri Oct 6 22:22:02 2006 UTC (16 months ago) by c4chris

Maybe you should put you script there as well, as yours seem to be a
updated version with more features?

Just my 2 cent.

Cu
knurd

[Michael Schwendt]

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:34:07 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

>  > bumpspecfile.py now retains whitespace around the release
> value.
>  
>  Hmmm.
>  
>
> http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rebuild-scripts/bumpspecfile.py?root...
>  [...]
>  Fri Oct 6 22:22:02 2006 UTC (16 months ago) by c4chris
>  
>  Maybe you should put you script there as well, as yours seem to be a
>  updated version with more features?
>  
>  Just my 2 cent. 
Hey, didn't know an older version was imported there.

I've committed it with a few more changes. EVR is added to the
changelog entries now, too. :)

[Horst H. von Brand]

orion(a)cora.nwra.com wrote:
>  Is there a script posted somewhere for automatically bumping the
> release
>  and adding a line to %changelog?  Perhaps we could get integrated into
>  Makefile.common?
>  
>  make bumprel COMMENT="Rebuild for gcc 4.3" 
Adding that line by hand is surely trivial, and a %changelog that just
records automatically generated (probably trivial) events isn't any real
use IMHO. Perhaps make rpmlint complain if there is no entry for the
version at hand?
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                    Fono: [phone]
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria             [phone]
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile               Fax:  [phone]

[Ville Skyttä]

On Saturday 09 February 2008, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
>  orion(a)cora.nwra.com wrote:
>  > Is there a script posted somewhere for automatically bumping the release
>  > and adding a line to %changelog?  Perhaps we could get integrated into
>  > Makefile.common?
>  >
>  > make bumprel COMMENT="Rebuild for gcc 4.3"
>
>  Adding that line by hand is surely trivial, and a %changelog that just
>  records automatically generated (probably trivial) events isn't any real
>  use IMHO. Perhaps make rpmlint complain if there is no entry for the
>  version at hand? 
It already does, with no-version-in-last-changelog or 
incoherent-version-in-changelog depending on the case.

For some reason unknown to me it did not do those checks for source rpms, but 
I've just changed that in upstream svn.