Fedora 30 Beta blocker status mail #4

[Ben Cotton]

The Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting is next week:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2019/3/21/#m9491

Action summary
====================

Accepted blockers
-----------------
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509
ACTION: libdnf maintainers to verify if an F29 update is required to
fix this in addition to the F30 update that is fixed.
ACTION: QA to verify the submitted fix allows for upgrade from F29->30
when modular repos are enabled.

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197
ACTION: systemd maintainers to identify and fix issue

3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688925
ACTION: QA to verify the submitted fix uses F30 backgrounds


Proposed blockers
-----------------
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648907
ACTION: grub2 and systemd maintainers to agree on a fix that addresses
installed systems

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688462
ACTION: libdnf maintainers to develop a solution that does not require
passing options when upgrading with modular repos enabled.


Bug-by-bug detail
=============

Accepted blockers
-----------------
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656509 - libdnf - MODIFIED
F29 to F30+ upgrades fail unless --allowerasing is used due to issue
with module_platform_id, even explicit --setopt=module_platform_id
does not work

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bc9607a8dc is
marked as fixing this in F30, but it’s not clear if an update is also
needed for the F29 package.

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197 - systemd - MODIFIED
gdm Fails to load with "nomodeset"

Patch to systemd upstream
(https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/11980) has been backported
but does not appear to address the issue for all scenarios (only UEFI
VM works. UEFI bare metal and BIOS for VM and metal still exhibit the
issue). Further investigation is required.

3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688925 - kde-settings - MODIFIED
Need kde-settings-30 with appropriate settings for F30, including
desktop background

Update https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-479a4ea8be submitted.

Proposed blockers
-----------------
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648907 - grub2 - POST
grub2-common kernel.d plugin removes $ESP/<machine-id>/ directory
rendering machine unbootable

Coordinated fixes for grub2 and systemd are in the works, however they
would only address new installs. Discussion is ongoing for how to
create a temporary workaround that would work for existing installs.

2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688462 - libdnf - NEW
System upgrades involving modular content require explicit
--setopt=module_platform_id to work correctly

Spun off from BZ #1656509. A solution to not require an option setting
is needed.


-- 
Ben Cotton
Fedora Program Manager
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...

[Tomasz Kłoczko]

On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 21:32, Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  The Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting is next week:
>  https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2019/3/21/#m9491 
Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30.
So no one cares that upcoming fc30 will deliver binaries from fc29?

kloczek
-- 
Tomasz Kłoczko |  LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH

[Adam Williamson]

On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 22:27 +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>  On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 21:32, Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com&gt;
> wrote:
>  > The Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting is next week:
>  > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/Fedora%20release/2019/3/21/#m9491
>  
>  Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30.
>  So no one cares that upcoming fc30 will deliver binaries from fc29? 
If they work...no, not particularly. It's not release-blocking, in any
case.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

[Leigh Scott]

>  Still mdadm is not even compiling on current fc30.
>  So no one cares that upcoming fc30 will deliver binaries from fc29? 
I don't care enough to apply the Debian fix, perhaps the maintainer does.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675363#c4