Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen
> Thomas Spura wrote:
>> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com>:
>>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>>> How do you do this check?
>> Show all useres in the cla_signed group  and search for the mail
>> address. When it's not there it may be overritten in .
>> When it's not there either, the user has not signed cla yet and cannot
>> be a packager, yet.
> You can't be a packager without signing the CLA, but you can sign the
> CLA without being a packager.
Yes, no cla -> no packager, like I wrote above.
When someone has signed the cla, you then need to look if the user is
already member of the packager group...
Perhaps I misunderstand, but I think the real problem is that the
email used for bugzilla doesn't have to be the same as the email
specified when signing up for a FAS account. So if the bugzilla email
isn't found in FAS, it doesn't necessarily mean that they don't yet
have a FAS account. Similarly, it also doesn't necessarily mean that
they haven't signed the CLA yet.
I don't know how these queries are done, but I would have thought that
if you can query whether any members of the CLA group have the email
address in question, you might as well query the Packager group from