latest xfsprogs gives warning: user/group bhcompile don't exist

[Sean Estabrooks]

In case anyone is listening ;o) when installing the latest xfsprogs from
the development rpms ( xfsprogs-2.6.0-1.i386.rpm) there is a stream of
errors complaining that the user and group "bhcompile" don't exist.

Cheers,
Sean

[Keith G. Robertson-Turner]

On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:40:20 -0500, Sean Estabrooks wrote:

>  
>  In case anyone is listening ;o) when installing the latest xfsprogs from
>  the development rpms ( xfsprogs-2.6.0-1.i386.rpm) there is a stream of
>  errors complaining that the user and group "bhcompile" don't exist. 
This is non-fatal and will default to root. Don't worry.

[Michael Schwendt]

On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:40:01 +0000, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:

>  On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:40:20 -0500, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
>  
>  > 
>  > In case anyone is listening ;o) when installing the latest xfsprogs from
>  > the development rpms ( xfsprogs-2.6.0-1.i386.rpm) there is a stream of
>  > errors complaining that the user and group "bhcompile" don't exist.
>  
>  This is non-fatal and will default to root. Don't worry. 
Not true for binary rpms.

--

[Keith G. Robertson-Turner]

On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:51:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:

>  On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 21:40:01 +0000, Keith G. Robertson-Turner wrote:
>  
> > On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:40:20 -0500, Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > In case anyone is listening ;o) when installing the latest xfsprogs from
> > > the development rpms ( xfsprogs-2.6.0-1.i386.rpm) there is a stream of
> > > errors complaining that the user and group "bhcompile" don't
> exist.
> > 
> > This is non-fatal and will default to root. Don't worry.
>  
>  Not true for binary rpms. 
Oops, just looked at "bhcompile" and assumed src.rpm.

I see from the other thread that Jeremy is working on it.