On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 2:27:44 PM CEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Musuruane
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>
>> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>> The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and
>> outdated information was removed.
>> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
>> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout
>> * https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/623
> The links to FHS specs are all outdated. The current one is
> Moreover I still read "The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard does not include
> any provision for libexecdir, " which is not accurate:
I still read the same issues. The page is protected and it cannot be
FWIW, I don't think the FHS has been fixed correctly WRT libexecdir, even
though it points to GNU Coding Standards (which is equivalent to how Fedora
FHS  says:
/usr/libexec includes internal binaries that are not intended to be
executed directly by users or shell scripts. ...
.. why there is the part ".. or shell scripts?". How a shell script differs
from other (binary) programs?
GNU standards  say "The directory for installing executable
programs to be run by other programs rather than by users.".