Trouble with koji

[Jochen Schmitt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hallo,

I'm trying to make a scratch build for kaya on rawhide to fix a FTBFS.

Unfortunately, I have got the lollowing error message:

DEBUG util.py:256:  No Package Found for ghc-editline

But from my view of point this package should exist.

It may be nice, if anyone can help me.

You may find the build at:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1563211

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt



> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkpwyIQACgkQT2AHK6txfgxGBgCfQuiZYYlOYB9btu4oqsBe9Eqj
> PQ8An1k9qzfl1FqLc7fCry8s3iaFehWt
> =zRAL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Mike Bonnet]

On 07/29/2009 06:09 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>  Hallo,
>  
>  I'm trying to make a scratch build for kaya on rawhide to fix a FTBFS.
>  
>  Unfortunately, I have got the lollowing error message:
>  
>  DEBUG util.py:256:  No Package Found for ghc-editline
>  
>  But from my view of point this package should exist.
>  
>  It may be nice, if anyone can help me.
>  
>  You may find the build at:
>  
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1563211 
The build of ghc-editline creates 3 subpackages

ghc-editline-devel
ghc-editline-doc
ghc-editline-prof

but no ghc-editline base package.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=121279

So there is no package providing ghc-editline.  I don't know enough
about Haskell packaging to know whether this is expected or not.

[Jochen Schmitt]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 29.07.2009 12:21, schrieb Mike Bonnet:
>  The build of ghc-editline creates 3 subpackages
>
>  ghc-editline-devel ghc-editline-doc ghc-editline-prof 
Thank you for your hint. Now
it's works for Rawhide, but
not for F-11.

On F-11 I got

DEBUG util.py:256:  No Package Found for ghc-editline-devel

The build you may find at:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1563427

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkpw3QsACgkQT2AHK6txfgz60QCfVWjxjVgHLTccNb/Kuunqztoi
> vuIAnjeGvvhkaXIRm1342PC0x2tLdq7D
> =jR5H
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Mike Bonnet]

On 07/29/2009 07:37 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>  Am 29.07.2009 12:21, schrieb Mike Bonnet:
> > The build of ghc-editline creates 3 subpackages
>  
> > ghc-editline-devel ghc-editline-doc ghc-editline-prof
>  Thank you for your hint. Now it's works for Rawhide, but
>  not for F-11.
>  
>  On F-11 I got
>  
>  DEBUG util.py:256:  No Package Found for ghc-editline-devel
>  
>  The build you may find at:
>  
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1563427 
It looks like ghc-editline was only added to Fedora after F11 GA.  It
has been built for F11 but never pushed through bodhi, so it never made
it into the Koji buildroots for F11 updates.  You'll need to create and
update via bodhi, or request a buildroot override by emailing
rel-eng(a)fedoraproject.org explaining why it's required (for example, so
dependent packages can be built and the entire set pushed out as one
update).

[Susi Lehtola]

edOn Wed, 2009-07-29 at 19:37 -0400, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>  
>  Am 29.07.2009 12:21, schrieb Mike Bonnet:
>  >
>  > The build of ghc-editline creates 3 subpackages
>  >
>  > ghc-editline-devel ghc-editline-doc ghc-editline-prof
>  Thank you for your hint. Now it's works for Rawhide, but
>  not for F-11.
>  
>  On F-11 I got
>  
>  DEBUG util.py:256:  No Package Found for ghc-editline-devel
>  
>  The build you may find at:
>  
>  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1563427 
A quick query on koji
 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8851
reveals that there is a succesful Fedora 11 build (a few even).

A cross-check in the updates database
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/ghc-editline
reveals no updates have been submitted.

So the package has to be tagged to the buildroot or be available in the
updates repository, first.
-- 
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussilehtola(a)fedoraproject.org