On 12/31/2010 06:27 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 17:06:55 +0100, Christoph wrote:
> 2010/12/31 Michael Schwendt:
>> Just for clarity, which "recent builds" are that?
>
> Recent means obviously those carrying an fc15 tag.
That isn't anything like obvious, because development of Fedora 15
has started _months_ ago, and the ".fc15" dist tag has been used for
several months already. Hence I wanted to know whether "recent" might
refer to builds done in the last week or the last days.
> No package later
> than those built for F11 should be of type i386 at all. ~ C
This is wrong.
I disagree.
It is still possible to alter the default buildarch.
Correct
... but this does not mean this is right nor does this mean this
is useful.
Here's a list of the i386 packages in Rawhide (cannot use
repoquery here atm):
$ html2text Index\ of\ _pub_fedora_linux_development_rawhide_i386_os_Packages.html|grep
i386.rpm
[[ ]] chealpix-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 10:14 24K
[[ ]] chealpix-devel-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:10 9.6K
[[ ]] elilo-3.6-9.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:48 222K
[[ ]] frysk-0.4-28.fc15.i386.rpm 28-Sep-2010 10:34 23M
[[ ]] frysk-devel-0.4-28.fc15.i386.rpm 28-Sep-2010 10:36 4.0M
[[ ]] frysk-gnome-0.4-28.fc15.i386.rpm 28-Sep-2010 10:36 4.1M
[[ ]] gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:31 160K
[[ ]] gpicview-0.2.1-3.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 10:22 93K
[[ ]] healpix-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:53 8.6M
[[ ]] healpix-c++-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:35 322K
[[ ]] healpix-c++-devel-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:59 63K
[[ ]] healpix-devel-2.13a-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:49 59K
[[ ]] jnettop-0.13.0-8.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:54 49K
[[ ]] kBuild-0.1.5-6.p2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:52 598K
[[ ]] libvncserver-0.9.7-4.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:27 153K
[[ ]] libvncserver-devel-0.9.7-4.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:59 45K
[[ ]] parcellite-0.9.2-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 06:32 56K
[[ ]] readline-6.1-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:14 181K
[[ ]] readline-devel-6.1-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 10:04 137K
[[ ]] readline-static-6.1-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:16 112K
[[ ]] tomcat-native-1.1.20-1.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:23 57K
[[ ]] tunneler-1.1.1-6.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:24 36K
[[ ]] xfce4-dict-0.6.0-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 07:45 112K
[[ ]] xfce4-dict-plugin-0.6.0-2.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:54 51K
[[ ]] xfce4-diskperf-plugin-2.2.0-6.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 09:58 35K
[[ ]] xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.1.0-5.fc14.i386.rpm 29-Jul-2010 08:03 355K
Now, somebody please explain why these packages use i386 and shall not
be considered "broken" - IMO, these packages all are broken.
Ralf