Second attempt: Maintainer contact check for Chris Grau (cgrau)

[FeRD]

As a follow-up to RHBZ 1779063 and in accordance with the non-responsive
maintainer policy[1], I'm posting to ask if anyone knows how to contact
Chris Grau (cgrau), sole maintainer of the following packages: frotz ifm
perl-Time-Piece (officially orphaned) perl-Time-Piece-MySQL (NOT orphaned —
not sure how that works) My primary interest is in frotz, as the version
currently packaged for F31 / rawhide is 2.43, which was released in October
2002. (I KNOW, right??) Version 2.44 was released in 2015, and now version
2.50 last month, so it'd be great to get updated packages built. There had
been a bug[2] open against frotz for the 2.44 update since Fedora 27, which
is only now closed because Fedora 29's EOL auto-closed it once again. [1]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_packa...
[2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510108

[Paul Howarth]

On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 10:01:19 -0500
FeRD <ferdnyc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  I'm posting to ask if anyone
>  knows how to contact Chris Grau (cgrau), sole maintainer of the
>  following packages: frotz ifm perl-Time-Piece (officially orphaned)
>  perl-Time-Piece-MySQL (NOT orphaned — not sure how that works) 
perl-Time-Piece was obsoleted by the base perl package way back in
5.10.0.

perl-Time-Piece-MySQL is an extension to perl-Time-Piece.

Paul.

[Frank R Dana Jr.]

Paul Howarth wrote,
>  perl-Time-Piece was obsoleted by the base perl package way back in> 5.10.0.
>
>  perl-Time-Piece-MySQL is an extension to perl-Time-Piece. 
Thanks for the info, Paul!

...Does that mean it no longer has any usefulness without perl-Time-Piece,and should be
similarly orphaned/retired?

[Paul Howarth]

On Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:35:36 -0000
"Frank R Dana Jr." <ferdnyc(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Paul Howarth wrote,
>  >
>  > perl-Time-Piece was obsoleted by the base perl package way back in>
>  >5.10.0.
>  >
>  > perl-Time-Piece-MySQL is an extension to perl-Time-Piece.  
>  
>  Thanks for the info, Paul!
>  
>  ...Does that mean it no longer has any usefulness without
>  perl-Time-Piece,and should be similarly orphaned/retired? 
No, when I said that "perl-Time-Piece was obsoleted by the base perl
package", I meant that its functionality was absorbed by the main perl
package, i.e. the module is now built from the perl SRPM rather than
its own SRPM. So perl-Time-Piece still exists, but is not built
independently of the perl interpreter itself.

So perl-Time-Piece-MySQL is still useful.

Paul.