jflory7 added a new comment to an issue you are following:
**Discussed during the first ever [Fedora Diversity
To say that this was heavily discussed would be an understatement! As a note, it would be
impossible for me to cover the level of detail that we took when discussing elements of
the survey during the FAD. But for the benefit of anyone who was not in attendance, I am
confidently able to assure that the strategies, questions, and level of thought that have
gone into these are significant and have been given great consideration. Here goes!
## Creating / identifying questions
As a way for us to reference how we did this in the past, the process for how we created
the questions is as follows:
1. @marinaz reviewed, edited, and expanded on the questions originally identified by
@tatica by cross-referencing other surveys such as the [FLOSS 2013
survey](https://www.win.tue.nl/~aserebre/msr14gregorio.pdf) and Apache Contributor User
2. Reviewed questions for content, made cuts to questions we believed to be irrelevant
3. With final set of questions, grouped all questions into categories (five 1s, five 2s,
five 3s, five 4s, five 5s, five 6s, and two 7s) and identified the strongest set of ~20
4. Further discussed and narrowed down answer options from final subset of questions
This is a very, very short breakdown of what was two days of discussion, debate, and
critical thinking / analysis.
The final questions we have along with answer choices will be posted towards the end of
the FAD once we finalize the list. I invite @amsharma, @bex, @bee2502, @jonatoni, and
@rhea to add anything else to this ticket comment that I may have overlooked or missed, as
far as details for strategy, planning, or other misc. details go.
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email