September 2012 - docs-qa - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 842190] New: Cpufreq governor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842190 Bug ID: 842190 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Cpufreq governor Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: h479627(a)rtrtr.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 832179] New: Power management guide is wrong for frequency scaling in Fedora 17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832179 Bug ID: 832179 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Power management guide is wrong for frequency scaling in Fedora 17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jnm11(a)cam.ac.uk Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Power management guide is wrong https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Power_Management_Guide/… Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 the location of the cpufreq directory is misspecified it is /lib/modules/3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64/kernel/drivers/cpufreq There are no modules acpi-cpufreq or p4-clockmod available is acpi-cpufreq directly compiled in. the cpuspeed package is mentioned for the userspace governor but no package exists in fedora 17. I have been completely unable to figure out the following use case. My laptop overheats and powers off if the cpu load is high for too long. There should be a cpu governor or userspace daemon that reduces frequency when the temperature gets too high. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 769438] New: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769438 Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: rpm-guide AssignedTo: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 548940 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=548940 Patch to Rpm Guide to fix rpm-guide-programming-python.xml Unfortunately the examples of Python code within the RPM guide have been thoroughly broken since the initial conversion to DocBook, due to the way Python treats leading whitespace as significant. I'm attaching a patch which overhauls this page, so that the code examples are syntactically valid. See the notes in the patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 846864] New: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '15

18 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846864 Bug ID: 846864 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: laine(a)redhat.com Summary: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: laine(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Product: Fedora Documentation The Getting Started Guide needs an overview of all the different toolsets, and when each would be appropriate. In particular I'm talking about the following: 1) gnome-boxes 2) virt-manager 3) virsh, virt-install 4) ovirt 5) Should we point some people to OpenStack? I will write up a first draft of this, and hand it to a qualified docs person to edit and correctly place in the guide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 846184] New: New Russian translation for Fedora Resource Management Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '15

28 May '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846184 Bug ID: 846184 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Summary: New Russian translation for Fedora Resource Management Guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: brezhnev(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: resource-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Created attachment 602635 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=602635&action=edit Russian translation of Fedora 17 Resource Management Guide The patch providing Russian translation of the guide is attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 829952] New: Outdated information about cgconfig service in Resource Management Guide for Fedora 17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 May '15

28 May '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829952 Bug ID: 829952 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Summary: Outdated information about cgconfig service in Resource Management Guide for Fedora 17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: brezhnev(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: resource-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: The Resource Management Guide for Fedora 17 contains outdated information about cgconfig service in section 2.1 "The cgconfig Service" The guide states that the cgconfig service is not started by default in Fedora 17. It is not true. In addition, the guide contains phrase "When you start the service with chkconfig" that is wrong for any release. For Fedora 17 is should be "When you start the service with the <command>systemctl start</command> command". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 782916] New: value of security measures; no metric, no scope description
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '14

27 Jun '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: value of security measures; no metric, no scope description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782916 Summary: value of security measures; no metric, no scope description Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: security-guide AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: budden(a)nps.navy.mil QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, eric(a)christensenplace.us, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: The juncture between computer security and network security is inadequate -- too many seams which leaves too many man-in-middle attack opportunities. The most egregious omission in this (otherwise pretty good) document is treatment of SCOPE. This probably belongs in the vicinity of 1.3. Analysis first. Map each of the security solutions you have in the guide onto the ISO Reference Model: Layer 1/2 security measures (like WiFi security) protect frames. The scope of the security is limited to a single segment. No security beyond the router and no security within end systems. Layer 3 security protected datagrams (VPNs do this, IPSec ....). The scope is an enclave tunneled through an internetwork. The protection cannot extend beyond the VPN boxes, so data is wholly unprotected within end systems (and LAN if the VPN box is associated with the last router). Layer 4/5 security includes SSL (aka TLS). You have a how-to for securing an http server (good) but no admonitions regarding scope -- the security extends from the TCP socket in one end system to the TCP socket at the other end of the connection -- again no security inside the OS comes from SSL. All of the above security measures protect infrastructure. But they do not protect the data. Layer 6/7 security measures protect the data. Here the scope _can be_ truly end to end. S/MIME is a good example (so is ssh and XML sign/crypt) where the data passes over the internet and through the OS in protected form. Only in a fairly small space is the data unprotected. In Evolution, for example, only the parts of the UA that deal with composing, reading, ... mail are places where the authenticity and confidentiality of the data is possible. Most of the rest of the UA (including all the filing system deals with data that has been protected exactly the way it's been sent over the network. In the case of Evolution (UAs differ in implementation) secured data is stored in the file system exactly the way it was transmitted. Recommendations: 1) include a mapping similar to above so users have an idea what the scope of this or that security measure is. 2) emphasize those security measures that apply to applications (layer 6/7) as Fedora distribution evolves and matures. (What got me here this morning is the continuing frustration getting Evolution to properly play ball with DoD CAC cards ... works, but doesn't 'just work'). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Security Guide 16.3 (doesn't have a date) How reproducible: The above analysis doesn't invent anything; it only organizes and sorts. Anyone can reproduce it. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 831619] New: Inaccuracy in Fedora 17 “Power Management Guide”
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Nov '13

12 Nov '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831619 Bug ID: 831619 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Inaccuracy in Fedora 17 “Power Management Guide” Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: vaskodd(a)yahoo.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: x86_64 Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Created attachment 591487 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=591487&action=edit The problem description in .pdf format - easy to follow Hi, First I want to notice I am a Linux newbie and my English is not that good. Now straight to the point! (The same description is available in the attached pdf file and is more easy to follow) I've noticed some inaccuracy in Fedora 17 “Power Management Guide” (Fedora Documentation), particularly in section “2.5. Tuned and ktune” including “2.5.1. The tuned.conf file” and “2.5.2 Tuned-adm”. In section “2.5. Tuned and ktune” right bellow the “yum install tuned” command it's written: “Installing the tuned package also sets up a sample configuration file at /etc/tuned.conf and activates the default profile.” There is no such file in /etc. I found a /etc/tuned/active_profile file containing the following: “/usr/lib/tuned/balanced/tuned.conf”. I'm not sure this file (/etc/tuned.conf) is missing only on my system or it has a new location by default for each profile - /usr/lib/tuned/profileX/tuned.conf. Bellow in this section and in “2.5.1. The tuned.conf file” it is pointed again that the default location for the tuned.conf file is /etc/tuned.conf. In section “2.5.2 Tuned-adm” in the first paragraph it is written “Fedora 17 includes a number of predefined profiles for typical use cases...”. Just to be precise it is good to be mentioned that these profiles are not installed by default with “yum install tuned” command (tuned-2.0.1-1.fc17 package), but can be found in tuned-profile-compat-2.0.1-1.fc17 package (I found it in Gnome Package Manager). Another thing in this section is in the last third of the page where it is written: “All the profiles are stored in separate subdirectories under /etc/tune-profiles. So /etc/tune-profiles/desktop-powersave contains all the necessary files and settings for that profile. Each of these directories contains up to four files:” There /etc/tune-profiles directory does not exist. Instead I found the profiles stored in /run/lib/tuned. Each directory for the corresponding profile typically contains only 2 files - script.sh and tuned.conf. The presence of script.sh is not mentioned in the directories contains description – it is mentioned ktune.sh insetad. That's all. I hope this is helpful. Best regards Vasil Draganov Fedora 17 3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64 P.S. “Power Management Guide” is great. It's really useful. The moment i run tuned service i noticed how quieter my laptop became (less heat – less fan needed :) ). The first thing I noticed about new Fedora installation was that the laptop was noisier in comparison to Win7 (I dual-boot with Win7). Tuned just fixed that :) Many thanks to the creators of Fedora Documentation!!! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 857583] New: Typo - Page pertaining to Fedora 17 has links to Fedora 16
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857583 Bug ID: 857583 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com Summary: Typo - Page pertaining to Fedora 17 has links to Fedora 16 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: kellybellis(a)gwi.net Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: i686 Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: installation-quick-start-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: URL looks like it might need attention Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 Live CD Image File How reproducible: typo - seems so at any rate Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: at page:http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Installation_Quick_… Link is to The image file for the Fedora 17 live CD is available from http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/16/Live/i686/Fe…. Shouldn't this be 17 instead of 16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 857729] New: Build errors out due to missing Package_Selection-dvd.xml file.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857729 Bug ID: 857729 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: high Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com Summary: Build errors out due to missing Package_Selection-dvd.xml file. Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: joat(a)757.org Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: installation-quick-start-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Publican issues the following error when trying to build the Installation Quick Start Guide: FATAL ERROR: XInclude:1604 in Installation_Quick_Start_Guide.xml on line 37: could not load Package_Selection-dvd.xml, and no fallback was found Verified that Package_Selection-dvd.xml does not exist in en-US/. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: consistent Steps to Reproduce: 1. mkdir projects 2. cd projects 3. git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/docs/installation-quick-start-guide.git 4. cd installation-quick-start-guide 5. publican build --langs=en-US --formats=html Same error is emitted for --formats=pdf Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 836383] New:=?UTF-8?Q?=20Merging=20teams=20and=E2=80=A6=20zanata=20or=20TXN?=?!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Aug '13

12 Aug '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836383 Bug ID: 836383 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: high Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com Summary: Merging teams and… zanata or TXN?! Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: installation-quick-start-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Hi, I am a maintainer of this guide at TXN, but before doing the full merge, i wanted to be sure… https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-ins-quick-start-guide/ * fb03c3c Adding zanata config file I can see some zanata things. You serious guys, you are moving to zanata? If so… * Please *MERGE* before. * Also, be notified that you won't benefit of any Fedora translators. Only RH folks are there… That's not good, we use a unified platform, already spreading translators between teams… having many platform is going to be a pain. * delete the transifex one. And prevent us, translators… If the project stay at TXN, why it does not have any .tx/config file? (or no lang_map?) Could I help? Thanks, -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 816765] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Mar '13

26 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816765 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: installation-quick-start-guide AssignedTo: rlandman(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. Would be appreciated to propagate this on all guides This should have been done for… F15 (at least). Thanks. see https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/language/fr/?project=2180 https://fedora.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora/language/fr_FR/?project=2180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 822857] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822857 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: readme-burning-isos AssignedTo: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. fr_FR is not the only duplicated team. See #816765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 822855] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822855 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: virtualization-guide AssignedTo: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. fr_FR is not the only duplicated team. See #816765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 822859] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822859 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: accessibility-guide AssignedTo: mail.gerardryan(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. fr_FR is not the only duplicated team. See #816765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 848546] New: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Mar '13

01 Mar '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848546 Bug ID: 848546 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Summary: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: rmeggins(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: freeipa-guide Product: Fedora Documentation https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/FreeIPA_Guide/creating-… "The FreeIPA setup process can be minimal, where the administrator only supplies some required information, or it can be very specific, with user-defined settings for many parts of the FreeIPA services. The configuration is passed using arguments with the ipa-install-server script." This should say ipa-server-install -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 769137] New: F16 Planet CCRMA Documentation links to F13 Repo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jan '13

19 Jan '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: F16 Planet CCRMA Documentation links to F13 Repo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769137 Summary: F16 Planet CCRMA Documentation links to F13 Repo Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: unspecified Component: musicians-guide AssignedTo: crantila(a)acanac.net ReportedBy: bugs(a)notinachos.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: The Fedora 16 CC Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 16 Musician's Guide: Edition 1.0 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. visit http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Musicians_Guide/sect-Mus… 2. Observe the links point to the Fedora 13 repositories. Actual results: su -c 'rpm -Uvh http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/\ planetccrma/13/i386/planetccrma-repo-1.1-2.fc13.ccrma.noarch.rpm Expected results: su -c 'rpm -Uvh http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/\ planetccrma/16/i386/planetccrma-repo-1.1-3.fc16.ccrma.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 855195] New: Add Documentation for "ActiveDirectory" Feature
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Dec '12

21 Dec '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855195 Bug ID: 855195 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Summary: Add Documentation for "ActiveDirectory" Feature Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: crantila(a)acanac.net Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: freeipa-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Since FreeIPA will benefit from this development, the FreeIPA Guide should have documentation of the new ActiveDirectory integration in Fedora 18. Refer to the feature page, which has links to pre-existing documentation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ActiveDirectory -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 834878] New: Error in Boot your computer from CD in F17 version of guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Nov '12

08 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834878 Bug ID: 834878 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: rlandman(a)redhat.com Summary: Error in Boot your computer from CD in F17 version of guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: akonstam(a)sbcglobal.net Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: i686 Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: installation-quick-start-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Fedora 17 How reproducible:always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: In the Fedora 17 version of the Installation Quick start guide there is a glaring error in Section 5: Boot your Computer from the CD. The section is supposed to describe the beginning od the intallation of the F17 Live CD. In this section is a screen shot Labeled: Figure 1. The Live CD boot screen. What is shown is not the Live CD boot screen and it certainly should not display a choice: Start Fedora 16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 854781] New: Add GUI section to 7 Zip chapter
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Oct '12

06 Oct '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854781 Bug ID: 854781 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com Assignee: eric(a)christensenplace.us Summary: Add GUI section to 7 Zip chapter Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: eric(a)christensenplace.us Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: security-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Created attachment 610128 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=610128&action=edit Patch adding GUI section to 7-Zip chapter. The 7-Zip chapter in the Security Guide does not have a section on working with the GUI. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

fedora documentation
by Phil King 04 Oct '12

04 Oct '12

Hello I am having to be away from the computer that has internet access. I was wondering if there was such a way to download the fedora 17 documentation as a whole so i can read it off line. if so would you please let me know ware to find it. Philip King Badger007 prk62(a)yahoo.com this information is public for me.

2 1

[Bug 860589] New: Typo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Oct '12

01 Oct '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860589 Bug ID: 860589 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com Assignee: eric(a)christensenplace.us Summary: Typo Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: cickumqt(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: security-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 857405] New: Readme Live Image isn't branched for F17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857405 Bug ID: 857405 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: kwade(a)redhat.com, nathan(a)afternoondust.co.uk, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Summary: Readme Live Image isn't branched for F17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: shnurapet(a)fedoraproject.org Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: readme-live-image Product: Fedora Documentation The guide isn't maintained, it needs to be branched for Fedora 17. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 853826] New: Section 3.1 - suggest adding "Less Down Time" verbiage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853826 Bug ID: 853826 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Summary: Section 3.1 - suggest adding "Less Down Time" verbiage Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: joat(a)757.org Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: virtualization-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: In Section 3.1, of the Draft Virtualization Guide for Fedora 18, suggest adding something similar to the following: "Less Down Time VMs can be copied or moved, configuration changes can be validated, and software updates can be tested without impacting the users' online experience." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 18 How reproducible: Not a fault. Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: N/A Expected results: N/A Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

Re: QA Wrangling Progress
by Christopher Antila 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:15:28 -0400 > From: joat <joat(a)757.org> > To: Fedora Docs QA list <docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> > Subject: Re: QA Wrangling Progress > Message-ID: > <CACo8Vi7BDfR070Ze-V7Jisf2WhXyUaGpjp0RiFCwM0WyUhzSCg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Christopher, > > I'm new to this. Is there a written procedure for us to follow? Are > we supposed to be filing bugs, approving fixes, or both? > > - Tim (joat) Hi Tim: I just made it up. It went something like this: 1.) Look at a feature, try to understand what it means. 2.) Look at our guides. 3.) Decide whether the feature changes something in a guide, or whether it should definitely be documented in a guide. 4.) If so, file a bug against the guide. This is a separate task from our other collective responsibility, which is to ensure QA contacts verify the fixes for pre-existing bugs that are marked as ON_QA or MODIFIED. As far as I can tell, we are mostly making this up as we go. Writing procedures and guidelines is a good idea, but for now we should just try to figure out how to get things moving at all. Christopher. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQTNGrAAoJEGpo1cWDqVnYUJQP/1N5S1DFgBy+Y+vMS1WySVM0 GNZYjd73HcLc7aUnyTw3VDfoZdXtnne4h1h43JkJEvKzgY+6FzhFQQ5hEkdO4YxX bIq9I5gmdK32hQCoAH0CxHWYaLA8wVcn4NGXYX7dBx+pmCu2OgiKF5/TXXghDVOg Byh3wCF/jKAnWiaPXEiW7xsGn/I1GbRGbhnppRORW2QFP4VqXjahIbA+CanvURZz i8cflYLe7XpyPRYQ+pT1r14RCoDloQDBT5aFXsZHv8MgESewRD/vhuLMPVsea0R6 /uUhtFinv+o4vgU8TxaRleYPljomEm+8h152V6kBM6XspjUEh16qHQmvYoynquU+ 7+9i0SrfS51an4+yakpLYAKoSkyP921NNo5QrJuAIgEOL2R2VS2akWEJAeIGcDmM SQI0JBm8fY1W3BjMjhETGV+np2cNbS2/0RMJRNLSW6IR03G7qsxGBXlejK2hFGB6 PS/4l/UD4vJ8HC0GMR1Ybt6SjujeSbQ8E6WvkmSpnYWNU8TbbmUyQMP8Ee8RrWTr 4NuqC3imqz0ANTH0yOJWBgA2teTdgFPb63MMdp30GCsLLEG5pJx81CrwQ9OAe/C3 MvRRnXNYHMLoyooq2uZxy2dgkRnVRIcUJKlyCKrT6qfCk6daYsgeyulzKnsPgdDo nKA7+QDq5vALHTVFIwYh =YKa4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

QA Wrangling Progress
by Christopher Antila 08 Sep '12

08 Sep '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings fellow QA Wranglers, and others: I finally got a start on our work for Fedora 18, filing bugs for new features that require modification to Fedora documentation. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/18/FeatureList I got to "KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.9," and filed a number of bugs, but there are still many more features to report about, so feel free to join in, then post an update here when you've gone through a few. Christopher. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQSUm/AAoJEGpo1cWDqVnYMmkP/iTnJk1ivjtIWWHZ2OnTMiS2 8L63YFodCweOZzjdF15Sel7cra49gy/CHTWMe+GHVbJCH5aXcyFzoYdVryWIzz/l WsG1gVQkvVH1qeKyhuRxJAFB8ri0oXiuvBGHqJ3mEyidwkJyO1+QSBsDt7airKva SjDQussUfTGQS4YTZ+6KxGhea5RPUUAW9LtgkvjqNBYpaZuvmsB3YBAt3QCpkUxK Hn3kATMBH/sHSHBEbO3j5Q+qjm65FqU8Ms1G167aSbxrrxvWTbnVXG7Hnm7odr5F SJrrJrMNNpEGPGQ3z6c2SQfYgpgxQbgWwM/dYA3LVOBtXazV4FkwWH0/bqlVl59p FdWUJEB7ogpT/Htr+LJa0ZcpvrkhxiWJoW66Hf30PXEZ7M4kFKrpDxHpvpbij/G+ tsP37VvXCbdTmC7xAZf7GTTzR8MSv3azMtFaoEeHShKMNzvajetI6OozpfSXJff/ SGehvGOG0V2OuLfByycUMgLUDq1fXuDgl6owsNlqWz2xSOYLQxBXrcE92LlmDxEC JppE8z3RVZ0oWVwaSZQrDx3WQ9eQKjbdW9u42qBRednxcGa762E3+izTJMi8bi4u 4nQhMPcblBFi+9QkD/sUOWeFboaXk+Hmq7ZMcP9k3LJrlqny0+3GXV/KsQYVu9J8 ltJ4RQqLYlT7b4mCGxUn =NRnb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[Bug 672494] Sentences not translatable in two parts
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa September 2012