[Bug 1080575] New: Forgetting: condition="fedora"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080575
Bug ID: 1080575
Summary: Forgetting: condition="fedora"
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: freeipa-guide
Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com
Reporter: Geodebay(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: dlackey(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In automount.xml, line 467/468
<screen condition="redhat">[jsmith@server ~]$ ipa-getkeytab -k /etc/krb5.keytab
-p host/nfs-client-server.example.com(a)EXAMPLE.COM</screen>
the screen for "fedora" is forgotten.
When you "publican" on fedora the automount.po file, the example dont appear.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
present
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
" Si la commande ipa-getkeytab est exécutée sur le client NFS, enregistrer
alors les clés directement dans le tableau de clés de l'hôte. Par exemple :
Pour une machine sous Fedora, c'est tout ce qu'il est nécessaire de faire."
Expected results:
" Si la commande ipa-getkeytab est exécutée sur le client NFS, enregistrer
alors les clés directement dans le tableau de clés de l'hôte. Par exemple :
[jsmith@server ~]$ ipa-getkeytab -k /etc/krb5.keytab -p
host/nfs-client-server.example.com(a)EXAMPLE.COM
Pour une machine sous Fedora, c'est tout ce qu'il est nécessaire de faire."
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 7 months
[Bug 1001356] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001356
Bug ID: 1001356
Summary: No Default Syslog
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: docs-requests
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998573
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog
No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically,
remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.)
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html
Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change.
In particular, review for coverage of `journalctl` and journald features.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 7 months
[Bug 986370] New: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986370
Bug ID: 986370
Summary: UEFI Secure Boot and Hibernate (Suspend to Disk)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: justin.mitchell.bennett(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
With OEMs shipping preloads of Windows 8 on new purchase computers, UEFI tends
to be enabled by default. Though Fedora can work with a secure boot UEFI bios,
certain features have been disable (See Fedora 18 UEFI Secure Boot Edition
18.4).
As hibernation (suspend to disk) functionality has been disabled on an UEFI
Secure Boot system, users need to be aware, prior to installation of Fedora (as
sole OS on the system), whether to enable or disable this functionality.
Those using Fedora on a laptop/netbook, shouldn't discover *after* completing
installation, that hibernation has been disabled. It becomes a huge pain, to
google how to disable the /boot/efi partition, and grub2, if even possible.
If not documented or referenced in the install-guide, CommonBugs should make
note of this issue.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 18, Fedora 19
How reproducible:
Install Fedora on a system with a Secure Boot, UEFI, enabled bios.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 7 months
[Bug 1089733] New: --useexisting not described for btrfs --subvol
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089733
Bug ID: 1089733
Summary: --useexisting not described for btrfs --subvol
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Severity: high
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: gene(a)czarc.net
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Description of problem:
In order to reuse an existing subvol (but not the rootfs), --useexisting must
be specified on the btrfs subvol command. This is not specified in the
documentation.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
20+
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 8 months
[Bug 1001049] New: Reinstallation method is not explained
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001049
Bug ID: 1001049
Summary: Reinstallation method is not explained
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: wifienclair(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
In paragraph 18.1 Determining Whether to Upgrade or Re-Install, it is written:
"This recommended reinstallation method helps to ensure the best system
stability possible."
But I didn't find a reinstallation method in the document.
I suggest to replace this sentence by something like:
"The reinstallation method is recommended to ensure the best system stability
possible."
and to add a paragraph or a chapter on how to reinstall.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 8 months
[Bug 1001367] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367
Bug ID: 1001367
Summary: Visible Cloud
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998582
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud
With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and
downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released
together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now,
let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options.
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001187...
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 9 months
[Bug 1021602] New: Visible Cloud
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021602
Bug ID: 1021602
Summary: Visible Cloud
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998582
Blocks: 1001367, 1001368
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998582 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Visible Cloud
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/VisibleCloud
With Fedora 19's First Class Cloud Images feature, we have Amazon EC2 and
downloadable cloud images (in qcow2 and raw.xz format) produced and released
together with the traditional desktop installer and and livecd images. Now,
let's go to the next level and present the cloud images as equal options.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:45:00 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100%
Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1].
All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be
validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required
bug state at this point is ON_QA.
As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a
point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be
reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any
questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
--- Additional comment from Matthew Miller on 2013-10-15 14:41:27 EDT ---
Here's the current status:
A) New web site design will put cloud on equal footing as described. Will
continue to work with web team on this.
B) Yes, we have basic cloud image release criteria.
C) The updated koji isn't in place for image generation with the new method, so
we will just use the old one. Not a problem but we may need to kludge things
differently in the kickstart file.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-16 06:58:37 EDT ---
Ok, thanks, setting the Change to ON_QA.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998582
[Bug 998582] Visible Cloud
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001367
[Bug 1001367] Visible Cloud
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001368
[Bug 1001368] Visible Cloud
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 9 months
[Bug 1021600] New: Application Installer
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021600
Bug ID: 1021600
Summary: Application Installer
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: install-guide
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mclasen(a)redhat.com,
pbokoc(a)redhat.com, rhughes(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998562, 1002288
Blocks: 1001335, 1001336
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998562 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Application Installer
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/AppInstaller
We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and
gpk-application) by a new application.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-27 11:26:43 EDT ---
Application Installer is tracked/still under discussion by FESCo.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-28 14:43:51 EDT ---
Current status from Change Page: The hawkey backend is available in PackageKit
git master. gnome-software is available in git.gnome.org. Neither is in f20
yet. We are aiming for a first gnome-software release by end of August, and
will package it asap, then.
--- Additional comment from Matthias Clasen on 2013-09-02 13:52:34 EDT ---
gnome-software has been built for f20 today
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100%
Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1].
All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be
validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required
bug state at this point is ON_QA.
As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a
point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be
reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any
questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-21 09:06:29 EDT ---
Change is completed, moving to ON_QA as agreed with the owner.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998562
[Bug 998562] Application Installer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001335
[Bug 1001335] Application Installer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001336
[Bug 1001336] Application Installer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002288
[Bug 1002288] Review Request: gnome-software - A software center for GNOME
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
9 years, 9 months