docs-qa February 2015

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
105 discussions

[Bug 1115469] New: Link to full documentation is incorrect
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115469 Bug ID: 1115469 Summary: Link to full documentation is incorrect Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: msuchy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: This page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… links to /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.1/apidocs/html/group__python.html Which does not exist on recent Fedoras. RPM API is documented at: /usr/share/doc/rpm-apidocs/index.html And I did not find documentation for rpm-python itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1025475] New: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025475 Bug ID: 1025475 Summary: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: admin(a)velusuniverse.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: calligra-kexi-driver-mysql summary says mysqwl driver for kexi but shouldnt it say mysql driver for kexi ?? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: use the yum extender andd look up calligra-kexi-driver-mysql Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: ummary says mysqwl driver for kexi Expected results: mysql driver for kexi Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1017792] New: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017792 Bug ID: 1017792 Summary: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In the "Verifying the %files section" chapter of the RPM guide [1], there is written "symlink", but it seems RPM uses "link" instead. Also I had trouble with the "maj" and "min", I guess there is "rdev" used instead. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. See the "Verifying the %files section" chapter Actual results: There are symlink, maj and min Expected results: The link and probably rdev Additional info: [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1003962] New: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003962 Bug ID: 1003962 Summary: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: daniel.neuberger(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The fedora RPM guide does not document the -p option that can be passed to the RPM scriptlets. It should probably be located here http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…, but I looked through the entire guide and couldn't find it. The only only place I could find it documented is here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets, but what it says is wrong. It says: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which allows the scriptlet to invoke a single program directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs. (ie: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig)" A more accurate description is: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which specifies the interPreter that should be used to run the script (the default is /bin/sh). Sometimes the -p option is used with no body in order to run a single command directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs (i.e. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig). Note that this form requires that there be nothing but white space (not even comments) until the next section begins." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1057882] New: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057882 Bug ID: 1057882 Summary: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an updated Czech version of the F20 Installation Quick Start Guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Mostly grammar errors found in current version. Expected results: An updated Czech translation published - missing translation(s) added, translation revision and precision. Additional info: If the bug BZ#1056196 is a serious obstacle, publish this update once the bug is resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1050903] New: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050903 Bug ID: 1050903 Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an update of the Czech translation of Burning ISO images to disc guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Translation update - missing translation, revision and precision. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 985020] New: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985020 Bug ID: 985020 Summary: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: bvoperdf21(a)mt2014.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Description of problem: First I'd like to thank for the awesome documentaions available. Also +1 for the export function (PDF,html-single,...). Looking at the packagers guide I missed some information. It would be nice if you also tell what kind of rpm packages are out there. What I found so far: .rpm .src.rpm .debugsource.... .debuginfo.... For example I still don't know if the debugsource is needed when using gdb for debugging or if the debuginfo package is enough. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Edition 18.0.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Pac… 2.read everything Actual results: no description of the defferent types of rpm packages Expected results: find description of the defferent types of rpm packages and what they are used for/by. Additional info: would be nice to have this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 959626] New: config_name mismatch in mock example
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959626 Bug ID: 959626 Summary: config_name mismatch in mock example Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: axilleas(a)archlinux.gr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fnadge(a)redhat.com Category: --- Description of problem: In section 2.4.3. Testing a Package with Mock, the last example uses the epel-6-x86_64 config whereas Fedora 18 is referenced above. According to the preamble, the example should read: mock -r fedora-18-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eject-2.1.5-0.1.fc18.src.rpm Link: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Pa… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1008227] New: SSD cache
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008227 Bug ID: 1008227 Summary: SSD cache Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: agk(a)redhat.com, i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com, jeremy(a)goop.org, jreznik(a)redhat.com, kzak(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, rdieter(a)math.unl.edu, rolf(a)rolffokkens.nl, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998543, 999690, 1000817, 1001120, 1003208, 1000078, 1003207 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998543 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: SSD cache For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SSD_cache Using recent kernel (3.9 and later) features for (fast) SSD caching of (slow) ordinary hard disks. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-21 13:35:33 EDT --- I'll build a bcache-tools RPM and a dm-cache-utils rpm (actually bcache-tools is already available here: bcache-tools-20130820-0.1.fc19.src.rpm). I'll follow the procedure as described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-24 11:51:34 EDT --- Tried to create a dmcache-utils package as well (Bug 1000078) but it doesn't look really useful. So I'll focus on bcache-tools first. For that I still need a sponsor. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-27 06:52:40 EDT --- I closed Bug 1000078 since good userland support requires LVM2 to support dm-cache. Which will happen 'in the future', but F20 doesn't look feasible to me. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:21:30 EDT --- Create Bug 1003207 (bcache support for dracut) which is not blocking for F20, but probably will be blocking for F21. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-08-31 16:25:06 EDT --- Create Bug 1003208 (bcache support for anaconda) which is not blocking for F20, but probably will be blocking for F21. --- Additional comment from Rolf Fokkens on 2013-09-09 04:18:18 EDT --- Test day planned: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/415 -------------------------------------------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185336.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 6

[Bug 1058066] New: new virt-xml functionality coming from upstream libvirt should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058066 Bug ID: 1058066 Summary: new virt-xml functionality coming from upstream libvirt should be documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com There is a new tool called `virt-xml` that will end up in Fedora soon[1]. It looks very useful, and should be documented. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-January/msg01226.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa February 2015