July 2015 - docs-qa - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 982914] New: 7.4.1. Configuring 802.1x Security
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982914 Bug ID: 982914 Summary: 7.4.1. Configuring 802.1x Security Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 7.4.1 under 'Procedure 7.8. For a wired connection...', ' Procedure 7.9. For a wireless connection...': The 'Network Connections' dialogue can be accessed via: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections, or via nm-connection-editor This is not specified at all in this section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982911] New: 7.3.3. Establishing a Mobile Broadband Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982911 Bug ID: 982911 Summary: 7.3.3. Establishing a Mobile Broadband Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Under section 7.3.3, in 'Procedure 7.3. Adding a New Mobile Broadband Connection', 'Procedure 7.4. Editing an Existing Mobile Broadband Connection': network connection editor can also be found at: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 982910] New: 7.3.5. Establishing a DSL Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982910 Bug ID: 982910 Summary: 7.3.5. Establishing a DSL Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 7.3.5 under 'Procedure 7.6. Adding a New DSL Connection', 'Procedure 7.7. Editing an Existing DSL Connection': These procedures could also specify that the network connections editor can be accessed from: activities --> applications --> Sundry --> Network Connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1221780] New: how to identify firmware types, UEFI vs BIOS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 May '16

19 May '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221780 Bug ID: 1221780 Summary: how to identify firmware types, UEFI vs BIOS Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com I'm not finding advice in documentation to identify firmware type. Should we, and if so where should it go? Identifying firmware type comes in handy e.g. reinstalling grub, see bug 1220066. The problem is, users overwhelmingly equate UEFI and BIOS, often referring to it as UEFI BIOS, mainly because OEM's still call firmware updates "BIOS updates". Two possible ways to reliably identify UEFI vs BIOS firmware. On an EFI system: # ls /sys/firmware/efi config_table efivars fw_platform_size fw_vendor runtime runtime-map systab vars On a BIOS system: # ls /sys/firmware/efi ls: cannot access /sys/firmware/efi: No such file or directory ---- On an EFI system: # efibootmgr BootCurrent: 0000 Timeout: 5 seconds BootOrder: 0000,0080 Boot0000* Fedora Boot0080* Mac OS X Boot0082* BootD1A6* AST BootFFFF* On a BIOS system: # efibootmgr efibootmgr: EFI variables are not supported on this system. Unknowns: The first method always works since ls is for sure installed no matter what. I need to test if efibootmgr is always installed, e.g. netinstall (?), it definitely is always installed from lives. But if it's not installed, then it's not a UEFI system. How does coreboot firmware manifest? I think it's mainly a "better BIOS" and should behave as such. ARM firmware? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1003065] New: images missing from document
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003065 Bug ID: 1003065 Summary: images missing from document Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: mordred(a)warpmail.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: in document: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administra… missing following 5 images under: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administra… images/authconfig-ui.png images/authconfig-local.png images/authconfig_LDAP.png images/authconfig_nis.png images/authconfig_winbind.png Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): n/a How reproducible: n/a Steps to Reproduce: n/a Actual results: Expected results: n/a Additional info: n/a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987309] New: Section 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 screenshot requires updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987309 Bug ID: 987309 Summary: Section 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 screenshot requires updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777226 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777226&action=edit advanced options F19 Description of problem: Screenshot in 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 needs updating -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987307] New: Section 11.1.2.4 Figure 11.2 requires updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987307 Bug ID: 987307 Summary: Section 11.1.2.4 Figure 11.2 requires updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777222 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777222&action=edit layout of ldap/kerberos options in authentication dialog Description of problem: Figure 11.2 in section 11.1.2.4 no longer looks like this as there is a third 'password options tab' on this dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 987301] New: Section 11.1.1 Figure 11.1 missing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987301 Bug ID: 987301 Summary: Section 11.1.1 Figure 11.1 missing Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 11.1.1 has a missing screenshot (Figure 11.1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 983366] New: Cover Page says "Fedora 17" in 'header' logo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983366 Bug ID: 983366 Summary: Cover Page says "Fedora 17" in 'header' logo Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Header logo on cover page of System Administrators guide says "Fedora 17" above first line of text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982894] New: 7.2.4. User and System Connections
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982894 Bug ID: 982894 Summary: 7.2.4. User and System Connections Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: the network settings dialogue does not have tabs, instead, the identity section of the dialogue is concerned with setting the connection to be available to all users (or not) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982510] New: 4.3. Using the User Manager Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982510 Bug ID: 982510 Summary: 4.3. Using the User Manager Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 4.3, the location of the user manager tool has changed in Gnome 3.8.3: Activities --> Applications --> Sundry --> Users and Groups -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982504] New: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982504 Bug ID: 982504 Summary: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: section 4.2 Using the User Accounts Tool related to bug 982500 location of the settings dialog is: activities --> applications --> utilities --> settings Further: The 'User Accounts' tool is called 'Users' in Gnome 3.8.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982444] New: 1.1 - region and language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982444 Bug ID: 982444 Summary: 1.1 - region and language Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Sys admin guide information regarding region and language doesn't specify which desktop environment is assumed to find the region and language. Also to find region and language in KDE, you click on the applications launcher, go to applications --> settings --> system settings, but it's also set as a favourite by default in F19 so can be found under favourites. Also in KDE, under system settings, the 'region and language' settings are under 'locale', 'country/region and language'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982500] New: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982500 Bug ID: 982500 Summary: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Gnome settings menu location has changed in 3.8.3: Activities --> Applications --> Utilities --> Settings This is not reflected in section 2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1245533] New: Documentation for setting up tftp server is missing for last two documentation releases
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Mar '16

07 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245533 Bug ID: 1245533 Summary: Documentation for setting up tftp server is missing for last two documentation releases Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: valent.turkovic(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I have tried setting up tftp server on fedora and failed miseably after 2 hours of trying. There is only a brief mention in Fedora 20 docs: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Installation_Guide/s1-n… But crucial config file is missing after installing tftpd server. Is this method abandoned? There is no mention of allowing ports for tftp in firewall. On previous Fedora installs this worked, I installed tftpd and allowed tftp ports in firewall, but now it doesn't work anymore. Is there some additional layer of security that it preventing clients from connecting to tftp server? Please document this and also show how to troubleshoot. Thanks. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Document URL: Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1136030] New: Need a new chapter about upgrading Fedora
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '16

06 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136030 Bug ID: 1136030 Summary: Need a new chapter about upgrading Fedora Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The current upgrade chapter is pretty much completely useless. We need a new one that would cover: * Automatic upgrades with FedUp, including how to prepare and how to clean up after the update finishes * Manual upgrade (or reinstall) - manually booting the installer on an existing system and using the normal installation process to overwrite the root filesystem while keeping the rest of the system (/home and any other separate filesystems) intact. There should be ample documentation on FedUp on the Fedora Wiki. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1018500] New: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '16

06 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018500 Bug ID: 1018500 Summary: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: storage-administration-guide Assignee: ddomingo(a)redhat.com Reporter: david.jones74(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: There's no section in the documentation for current Fedora versions, about how to configure NFS. There's SAMBA and FTP, but no NFS. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Search or browse documentation. 2. 3. Actual results: Can find scattered information about configuring NFS, but no consolidated section. Expected results: Section for configuring NFS clients and servers. Additional info: There are many changes in NFS configuration since Fedora 14. There's a different init system with different service names, There's also a new firewall manager. I'm just guess at a lot of the details, and it's pretty frustrating. Why does SAMBA have a large detailed section, and NFS has nothing? This is Linux, right? Is the Fedora Project moving to SAMBA as the preferred file sharing method? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1226101] New: $expected_checksum not correct in "Verifying checksums on Windows systems"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226101 Bug ID: 1226101 Summary: $expected_checksum not correct in "Verifying checksums on Windows systems" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: iam(a)nnutter.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 1031533 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1031533&action=edit Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM Description of problem: When following the steps in "Verifying checksums on Windows systems" the value of the `$expected_checksum` is 'sha256' because it is splitting the line and grabbing the first word. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 22, full URL in "Additional info". How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso. 2. Download Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM.txt. 3. Follow PowerShell instruction from "Verifying checksums on Windows systems". Actual results: `$expected_checksum` equals 'sha256'. PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $checksum_file = "Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM.txt" PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $image = "Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso" PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum = ((Get-Content $checksum_file | Select-String -Pattern $image) -split " ")[0].ToLower() PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum sha256 Expected results: `$expected_checksum` equals '615abfc89709a46a078dd1d39638019aa66f62b0ff8325334f1af100551bb6cf'. PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum = ((Get-Content $checksum_file | Select-String -Pattern $image) -split " ")[3].ToLower() PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum 615abfc89709a46a078dd1d39638019aa66f62b0ff8325334f1af100551bb6cf Additional info: I've attached the "Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM.txt" since it is not very large but it's from, https://getfedora.org/verify The "Verifying checksums on Windows systems" page is, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Installation_Guide/sect… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1146950] New: Test Bug
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146950 Bug ID: 1146950 Summary: Test Bug Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-reference-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: jhradile(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com This is just a test bug. Please, feel free to ignore it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 990252] New: incomplete index for Virtualization Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990252 Bug ID: 990252 Summary: incomplete index for Virtualization Administration Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: stephent98(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The index for the Virtualization Administration Guide has only three entries. Specifically, I was trying to find information on host memory requirements. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administr… How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1098298] New: Some problems in "Chapter 11. Storage pools"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098298 Bug ID: 1098298 Summary: Some problems in "Chapter 11. Storage pools" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: bughunt(a)gluino.name QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com In: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administr… I want to create storage pools using virsh. Corrections: Create the storage pool definition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "The path to a file system directory for storing guest image files. If this directory does not exist, virsh will create it." This is incorrect. "You have to create it afterwards using virsh" is correct. Create the local directory - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I create the directory under "/home" Documentation shows that "ls -la /guest_images" shows the directory having permissions "700". This is incorrect, the permissions are "755" (at least for me) Improvement: Maybe one should also add the output of ls --lcontext -la /guest_images/ drwxr-xr-x. 2 system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 . drwxr-xr-x. 5 system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 .. The wrong permissions error is repeated under "6. Verify the storage pool configuration": ls -la /guest_images/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 . drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 .. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1068889] New: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jan '16

27 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068889 Bug ID: 1068889 Summary: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: sclark(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 866496 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=866496&action=edit The attached archive contains patches to implement this change Following instructions in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs remove the version number from the directory name for all references to any package documentation directory in /usr/share/doc , leaving just the package's name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1217953] New: '--nombr' option from bootloader keyword in kickstart file is not documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '16

21 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217953 Bug ID: 1217953 Summary: '--nombr' option from bootloader keyword in kickstart file is not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: franta(a)hanzlici.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: 'ksverdiff -f F20 -t F21' command (among others) print: " The following options were added to the bootloader command in F21: --disabled --nombr " But F21 'Installation Guide' in "A.2.2. bootloader" chapter: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/sect-… not mention '--nombr' option for this keyword. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F21 Installation Guide (above URL) ksverdiff from pykickstart-1.99.65-2.fc21.noarch Additional info: - for unknown reason, RH Bugzilla offers only 'devel' version for this issue, although I want report it again F21. - of course, there may be bug somewhere in 'ksverdiff'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1214964] New: Hold Option to select boot source on Mac hardware
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '16

21 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214964 Bug ID: 1214964 Summary: Hold Option to select boot source on Mac hardware Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: beland(a)alum.mit.edu QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co I'm not sure where to find the draft of the Fedora 22 Installation Guide, but I went through the Fedora 21 version steps in order to install the beta today. One suggestion for the new version of this page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/chap-… I recommend adding something like "On Mac hardware, hold down Option to enter the boot media selection menu." Mac hardware with Intel chips is rather common now, so I hope a significant number of people would be aided by that addition. I spent several hours trying to figure that out the first time I put Fedora on a Macbook. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1246770] New: Link points to wrong "common bugs" page
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Dec '15

10 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246770 Bug ID: 1246770 Summary: Link points to wrong "common bugs" page Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: r_mercado(a)o2.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Section 1.4 of the Release Notes for Fedora 22 include a link to "Common F22 Bugs" in the Fedora Wiki, but the link takes one to "common F21 bugs". Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Release_Notes/sect-Relea… 2. Navigate to section 1.4 3. Click on "Common F22 Bugs" Actual results: The link takes the browser to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F21_bugs Expected results: Browser at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F22_bugs Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa July 2015