docs-qa November 2016

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

2 participants
76 discussions

[Bug 1357567] New: Need to publish latest version of Defensive Coding Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Mar '17

08 Mar '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357567 Bug ID: 1357567 Summary: Need to publish latest version of Defensive Coding Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: defensive-coding-guide Priority: high Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co Reporter: sparks(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fweimer(a)redhat.com Blocks: 1357534 Can we get the latest version of the Defensive Coding Guide published? I don't think it's been updated since the Publican toolchain broke. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 10

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '16

28 Nov '16

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (790 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

Re(4): Phil King
by Phil King 25 Nov '16

25 Nov '16

Not able to show full message. You can view it by clicking here Fri, 25 Nov 2016 04:58:07 +0000 Mail error code: 1qfye

1 0

RE (3):
by Phil King 23 Nov '16

23 Nov '16

Unable to display full message. To view this message please click here Wed, 23 Nov 2016 18:26:35 +0000 Browser error code: 3k1a8

1 0

[Bug 1358429] New: Adjustments for glibc split NSS packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Nov '16

23 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358429 Bug ID: 1358429 Summary: Adjustments for glibc split NSS packages Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Depends On: 1338889 In Fedora 25, the NIS NSS modules have been moved to the nss_nis package. The System Administrator's Guide needs to be updated to mention that both ypbind and nss_nis packages need to be installed in order to enable NIS support. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338889 [Bug 1338889] glibc: Split NSS modules into individual subpackages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1294988] New: Feedback section - to file a report: install-guide is found under "Fedora Documentation", not "Fedora"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Nov '16

23 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294988 Bug ID: 1294988 Summary: Feedback section - to file a report: install-guide is found under "Fedora Documentation", not "Fedora" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: alan.christopher.jenkins(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Installation_Guide/pr01… "If you find a typographical error in this manual, or if you have thought of a way to make this manual better, we would love to hear from you! Please submit a report in Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ against the product Fedora." I think it needs to say "Fedora Documentation" instead of "Fedora". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1383089] New: Inconsistent steps for TigerVNC
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383089 Bug ID: 1383089 Summary: Inconsistent steps for TigerVNC Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: lzap(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Hi guys! It looks like https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/24/html/System_Administrators_G… is a bit out of date. The service changed the way it starts, it now requires two changes: User=MY_USER PIDFile=/home/MY_USER/.vnc/%H%i.pid I also suggest to add Troubleshooting section: A) When VNC server does not start, check status of the service (systemctl status), system journal or SELinux denials. (I recently filed a bug 1383088 for Fedora 24 on that topic) B) TigerVNC enforces encryption when using password authentication. Some clients (outdated or MacOS built-in Shared Screen application) won't be able to connect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1232568] New: Clarification of VNCServer setup Requsted
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232568 Bug ID: 1232568 Summary: Clarification of VNCServer setup Requsted Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: eckirchn(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com using: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/System_Administrators_G… [in the below statements X = {1, 2, 3....10}] I was able to install and connect to a VNC session using "vncviewer -via XXXXX" however it was only after executing "systemctl start vncserver@:X.service' on the remote machine. Executing systemctl enable vncserver@:X.service results in: Failed to execute operation: No such file or directory Section 8.1.3. Starting VNC Server states: systemctl enable vncserver@:display_number.service however, unless one creates a file such as: vncserver@:X.service the command systemctl enable vncserver@:X.service does not work. After some time with the help of [coolmadmax] on IRC://#Fedora, I was able to understand this was where I was missing a step. I think it would help to add some clarifying statements here to help others. The guide [coolmadmax] suggested: https://stufs4u.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/install-and-configure-vnc-server-i… added this ounce of clarification. Help on this issue included [mutk] [fenrus02] [kendell] [devhen] and [_AnK] and I thank all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (783 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

RE (2):
by Phil King 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

Not able to show full message. Please click here to view this message Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:53:07 +0000 Google Error #vocm4

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa November 2016