docs-qa July 2016

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
78 discussions

[Bug 1313022] New: stale grub2 reset/reinstall information
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Sep '16

26 Sep '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313022 Bug ID: 1313022 Summary: stale grub2 reset/reinstall information Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Refresh of 20.4, 20.4.1, and 20.4.2 makes section 20.4.3 obsolete. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/System_Administrators_G… Actual results: 20.4.3 suggests: rm /etc/grub.d/* ## probably not necessary rm /etc/sysconfig/grub command ## obsolete On UEFI-based machines, issue the following command as root: ~]# grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.cfg ## stale location, is now fedora not redhat. Expected results: Maybe just delete this section. The previous sections are clear. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1272433] New: A "short" table of contents would improve the document (IMO)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 23 Aug '16

23 Aug '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272433 Bug ID: 1272433 Summary: A "short" table of contents would improve the document (IMO) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: nljlistbox2(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The Fedora 21 System Administrator's Guide has a very detailed table of contents which is good, but it hinders quick navigation and makes it hard to grasp the scope of the document. IMO it would improve the document to add a "short" table of contents before the existing long table of contents. Something with the following level of detail would be good: Preface 1. Target Audience 2. How to Read this Book 3. Document Conventions 4. We Need Feedback! 5. Acknowledgments I. Basic System Configuration 1. Opening Graphical Applications 2. System Locale and Keyboard Configuration 3. Configuring the Date and Time 4. Managing Users and Groups II. Package Management 5. Yum III. Infrastructure Services 6. Services and Daemons 7. OpenSSH 8. TigerVNC IV. Servers 9. Web Servers 10. Mail Servers 11. Directory Servers 12. File and Print Servers 13. Configuring NTP Using the chrony Suite 14. Configuring NTP Using ntpd 15. Configuring PTP Using ptp4l V. Monitoring and Automation 16. System Monitoring Tools 17. Viewing and Managing Log Files 18. Automating System Tasks 19. OProfile VI. Kernel, Module and Driver Configuration 20. Working with the GRUB 2 Boot Loader 21. Manually Upgrading the Kernel 22. Working with Kernel Modules A. RPM B. Revision History Index Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Current version at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html-single/System_Administr… on 2015-10-16. Additional info: Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1278460] New: Add warning that FreeIPA guide is out of date
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Aug '16

11 Aug '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278460 Bug ID: 1278460 Summary: Add warning that FreeIPA guide is out of date Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: freeipa-guide Assignee: mkosek(a)redhat.com Reporter: pspacek(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mkosek(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Docs related to FreeIPA like https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/FreeIPA_Guide/Using_Mic… are quite old and outdated. This makes our life hard because Google is offering these old docs all the time and people are trying to use it, despite the fact that it is outdated. Please add BIG FAT warning on top of each page in the guide and say 'This is outdated, go and read http://www.freeipa.org/page/Documentation instead!' I imagine something like Warning box on top of each page before any other text. I have no idea if it is possible or not. Thank you for your time! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1361846] New: Typos & Reformulations needed
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '16

04 Aug '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361846 Bug ID: 1361846 Summary: Typos & Reformulations needed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: bughunt(a)gluino.name QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: ======================= https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Virtualization_Getting_… contains this text: "The management tools can be located on separate physical machines from the host using secure protocols. libvirt is the the foundation of the Gnome application: gnome-boxes is built apon. " This probably needs reformulation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1352287] New: Typo in Section 5.7: Boxes tips and tricks.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '16

27 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352287 Bug ID: 1352287 Summary: Typo in Section 5.7: Boxes tips and tricks. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Severity: high Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: thejranjan(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: In the Boxes tips and tricks section "libvirtd" is wrongly typed as "libvertd" https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Virtualization_Getting_… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '16

25 Jul '16

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (664 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1358430] New: Adjustments for glibc split NSS packages
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '16

20 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358430 Bug ID: 1358430 Summary: Adjustments for glibc split NSS packages Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: deployment-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dhensley(a)redhat.com, jhradile(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 1338889 In Fedora 25, the NIS NSS modules have been moved to the nss_nis package. The Deployment Guide needs to be updated to mention that both ypbind and nss_nis packages need to be installed in order to enable NIS support. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338889 [Bug 1338889] glibc: Split NSS modules into individual subpackages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001344] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001344 Bug ID: 1001344 Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, vgoyal(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998565 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines. --- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT --- I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not sure how to do it. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT --- (In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1) > I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am > not sure how to do it. Vivek, create Package Review - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps. Thank you. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001343] New: Allow kdump on secureboot machines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001343 Bug ID: 1001343 Summary: Allow kdump on secureboot machines Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, vgoyal(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998565 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998565 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Allow kdump on secureboot machines For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines. --- Additional comment from Vivek Goyal on 2013-08-22 10:43:53 EDT --- I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am not sure how to do it. --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-26 10:28:07 EDT --- (In reply to Vivek Goyal from comment #1) > I think first thing is to include a new package ima-evm-tools in F20. I am > not sure how to do it. Vivek, create Package Review - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process for ima-evm-tools and block this bug on the created review bug. After review, add it to comps. Thank you. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001179.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1357691] New: error in virt drivers rpm path
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '16

19 Jul '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357691 Bug ID: 1357691 Summary: error in virt drivers rpm path Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Severity: low Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: ToddAndMargo(a)zoho.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Windows_Virtio_Drivers RPM contents ... /usr/share/guest-agent/*.msi: QEMU Guest Agent 32bit and 64bit MSI installers Should be: /usr/share/virtio-win/guest-agent/*.msi: QEMU Guest Agent 32bit and 64bit MSI installers The "/virtio-win" is missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa July 2016