July 2016 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (657 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 977042] New: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977042 Bug ID: 977042 Summary: GUI examples presume GNOME without stating it is GNOME Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com The System Administrator's Guide references a number of GUI utilities, many of which are specific to GNOME. It isn't immediately obvious to the uninitiated that this is the case, causing non-GNOME users to find fault with the guide. I suggest an admonition in the preface along the lines of "Some of the graphical procedures and menu locations are specific to GNOME, but most command line instructions will be universally applicable" Comprehensively differentiating between GNOME procedures, procedures for other DEs, and universal procedures would probably be prohibitively time consuming. --Pete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 997219] New: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997219 Bug ID: 997219 Summary: No "Write to Disk" option for ISO images in Fedora 19 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Assignee: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Reporter: sirjake(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Description of problem: Guide says that you can right click on a ISO image and choose "Write to disc." This is not true, at least with Fedora 19. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 19 How reproducible: Always, at least in 32 bit. Steps to Reproduce: 1. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Burning_ISO_images_to_... 2. Insert a DVD. 3. Attempt to follow the directions above. No "Write to disk" option exists. Actual results: No obvious way to burn ISO images in Fedora Linux 19. Expected results: Directions to burn ISO disk in Fedora Linux 19 Additional info: I had a new-to-me computer that I assumed would not support 64 bit, but after installing 32 bit found out that 64 was supported by my processor. I downloaded 64 ( Fedora-Live-Desktop-x86_64-19-1.iso ), and wanted to burn a disk of it, but the option was not available and the directions online did not help. I had to go back to Windows on a different machine to burn it. Note: I do have a DVD burner on this machine. The same thing occurs with CD's in the burner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1336138] New: System Administrator guide: Documentation of grubby commands must be run as root

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336138 Bug ID: 1336138 Summary: System Administrator guide: Documentation of grubby commands must be run as root Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: fh.fedora(a)fhenry.fr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In chapter: 21.4. Configuring GRUB 2 Using the grubby Tool The following commands should be mentioned to be executed also as root, like the other ones, using a sharp caracter at begining of each command; ~]$ grubby --info=ALL ~]$ grubby --info /boot/vmlinuz-4.2.0-1.fc23.x86_64 grubby --remove-args="argX argY" --args="argA argB" --update-kernel /boot/kernel ~]$ grubby --info /boot/vmlinuz-4.2.0-1.fc23.x86_64 Otherwise, this error is displayed in the console: Unable to access bootloader configuration file "/etc/grub2-efi.cfg": Permission denied Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 23 - System Administrator Guide How reproducible: Run command 'grubby --info /boot/vmlinuz-X.Y.Z-r.fc23.x86_64' as user Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Error: Unable to access bootloader configuration file "/etc/grub2-efi.cfg": Permission denied Expected results: Command is executed without error Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 1343775] New: Guide for Fedora 23 still has "DRAFT" watermark

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343775 Bug ID: 1343775 Summary: Guide for Fedora 23 still has "DRAFT" watermark Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: jon(a)endpoint.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1165767 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1165767&action=edit simple patch to remove draft status The web documentation here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/System_Administrators... still has a big "DRAFT" watermark. But Fedora 24 is coming out soon. If the Fedora 23 docs aren't past draft stage now, they never will be. :) Maybe there's some official process for promoting a document beyond the draft stage, but if so, I'm not sure what the point is if it never happens before a new Fedora release comes out. Attached is a patch to change that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (650 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

7 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1354120] New: Wrong path to grub2 configuration file for BIOS systems

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354120 Bug ID: 1354120 Summary: Wrong path to grub2 configuration file for BIOS systems Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: multiboot-guide Assignee: me(a)petetravis.com Reporter: samuel.rakitnican(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: me(a)petetravis.com From the "Multiboot Guide" section 6.4. Configuring the GRUB Bootloader https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/GRUB-... https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Multiboot_Guide/GRUB-... In Example 1.3 path /boot/grub/grub2.cfg should be /boot/grub2/grub.cfg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

7 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by Red Hat Bugzilla

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (643 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

7 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa July 2016