November 2017 - docs-qa - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 1350454] New: Error on Shasum Check for Mac OS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350454 Bug ID: 1350454 Summary: Error on Shasum Check for Mac OS Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: low Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: wk4(a)tuta.io QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1282228 Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 24 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. open terminal 2. $ cd ~/Downloads/ 3. shasum -a 256 -c *CHECKSUM Actual results: shasum: Fedora-Workstation-24-x86_64-CHECKSUM: no properly formatted SHA1 checksum lines found Expected results: shasum: Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-24-1.2.iso: Fedora-Workstation-netinst-x86_64-24-1.2.iso: FAILED open or read Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-24-1.2.iso: OK shasum: WARNING: 1 listed file could not be read Additional info: Tested on Mac OS X 10.11.5 (15F34) Submitting a separate report as the bug (1282228) mentions both Mac OS and Ubuntu. I do not have a fix for Ubuntu, only Mac OS. How to fix: I recommend replacing the step 3 in the guide with "$ grep '^SHA256' *-CHECKSUM | awk -F '[()=]' '{ print $4 " " $2 }' | shasum -a 256 -c". Credit (Fredy): https://web.archive.org/web/20160627132229/https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1318103] New: LiveUSB Creator as primary downloadable
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318103 Bug ID: 1318103 Summary: LiveUSB Creator as primary downloadable Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Currently LiveUSB Creator is not mentioned at all in official documentation for any platform. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Installation_Guide/sect… First, the two Windows platform recommendations in the documentation are odd because they're neither created nor tested within Fedora. Second, Live USB Creator is planned to be the primary/most prominent download method for Fedora 24 for Fedora (maybe other Linux distros as well), Windows, and possibly OS X if it arrives in time. So documentation should be updated to reflect this. Change description: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/ChangeSet#LiveUSBCreator_as_Prim… Bug tracking: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310542 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1312621] New: dhcpd instructions are unclear for PXE boot
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312621 Bug ID: 1312621 Summary: dhcpd instructions are unclear for PXE boot Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: danofsatx(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Section 10.2 of the Installation Guide gives the example setup for dhcpd to enable a PXE boot / network installation. The example is unclear between paragraphs 2 and 4 in that the text in paragraph 4 does not match up with the text in paragraph 2, and there are no clear instructions as to where it goes in the example file. After trial and error and comparing with the F20 instructions, I was able to get dhcpd started again. I suggest modifying paragraph 4 to include the whole file as such: option arch code 93 = unsigned integer 16; subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1; option routers 192.168.1.1; range 192.168.1.11 192.168.1.50; authoritative; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; ddns-update-style none; if option arch = 00:07 { filename "uefi/shim.efi"; } else { filename "pxelinux.0"; } next-server 192.168.1.2; } -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1309111] New: Package environment ID required in kickstart
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309111 Bug ID: 1309111 Summary: Package environment ID required in kickstart Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: cspicer(a)redhat.com Reporter: dgallowa(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Documentation states a package environment's name can be specified in a kickstart when the ID is required instead. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Installation_Guide/sect… @^Infrastructure Server <- does not work @^infrastructure-server-environment <- works Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 22 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create kickstart specifying @^Infrastructure Server in %packages 2. Start install Actual results: You have specified that the group 'Infrastructure Server' should be installed. This group does not exist. Would you like to ignore this group and continue with installation? Please respond 'yes' or 'no': Expected results: Group/Environment get installed Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1162045] New: Power Mgmt Guide needs to Address Howto Suppress Sleep State
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162045 Bug ID: 1162045 Summary: Power Mgmt Guide needs to Address Howto Suppress Sleep State Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Severity: low Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: redzilla.coralnut(a)xoxy.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: F20 Power Management Guide does not address the hooks into the sleep system provided by systemd. Ever since p,m-utils was deprecated there have been no Fedora/RHAT resources available that discuss how to utilize the hooks into the sleep system to prevent entry into the sleep state. Example: in the era of pm-utils (going back to what, F15?) one could write scripts to suppress the transition to S3 if a desirable network connection were established that should not be interrupted. All that was required was to place the script in /etc/pm/sleep.d/ and have it issue a non-zero exit code if sleep should be suppressed. When the goto sleep process prepared for sleep by executing the script, the script could deliver a non-zero exit code and prevent entry into the sleep state. Now that pm-utils has been deprecated and replaced with systemd, Fedora now ignores any/all scripts in /etc/pm/*. That isn't a problem. What *IS* a problem, though, is that for the past 5 releases of Fedora, the Power Management Guide has completely ignored the topic of how to use custom scripts to prevent entry into the sleep state. As a result, our only options are to look for help and examples in other distributions. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F20, F21 How reproducible: N/A. The documentation doesn't address the problem. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1080006] New: Incorrect command for multi-core power saving
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080006 Bug ID: 1080006 Summary: Incorrect command for multi-core power saving Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: fedorabugs(a)aylett.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In section 4.2 [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Power_Management_Guide/…] there's a list of commands that can be executed to save some power. The command listed for "enable multi-core power-saving (part of the laptop-battery-powersave profile)" is a duplicate of the previous command and is therefore incorrect. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.1-0 The command is given as: echo Y > /sys/module/snd_ac97_codec/parameters/power_save Which is the command for enabling audio codec power saving, not for enabling multi-core power saving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1036886] New: Incorrect command to start tuned at boot in Power Management Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036886 Bug ID: 1036886 Summary: Incorrect command to start tuned at boot in Power Management Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: stevenhrosenberg(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: On this page -- http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Power_Management_Guide/s… -- the command to start the tuned utility at boot has two words transposed: Specifically right here -- http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Power_Management_Guide/s…: How it reads: To enable tuned to start every time the machine boots, type the following command: systemctl tuned enable But it should be: To enable tuned to start every time the machine boots, type the following command: systemctl enable tuned As you can see, the last two words of the command need to be transposed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1008872] New: CPUfreq documentation for F19 lacks information on the new intel_pstate driver and its governors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008872 Bug ID: 1008872 Summary: CPUfreq documentation for F19 lacks information on the new intel_pstate driver and its governors Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: mail2benny(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Power_Management_Guide/… only documents governors for the acpi-cpufreq driver but not for the new intel_pstate driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 994167] New: typo in servicectl enable command
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994167 Bug ID: 994167 Summary: typo in servicectl enable command Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Assignee: yruseva(a)redhat.com Reporter: joseignacio.quintana(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, yruseva(a)redhat.com Description of problem: >>> F19, power-management-guide, Section: 2.5.3. Installation and Usage >>> command "systemctl tuned enable" should be "systemctl enable tuned" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): >>> F19 doc of power management guide How reproducible: # systemctl tuned enable # ERR: Unknown operation 'tuned'. # systemctl enable tuned # OK: ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/tuned.service' '/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/tuned.service' Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 973950] New: Type in Chapter 1.2
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973950 Bug ID: 973950 Summary: Type in Chapter 1.2 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: power-management-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Reporter: swierckx(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, r.landmann(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In chapter 1.2 of the power management guide there is a type in the fedora version mentioned "The kernel used in releases of Fedora prior to Fedora 8 used a periodic timer for each CPU. This timer prevents the CPU from truly going idle ..." should probably be ""The kernel used in releases of Fedora prior to Fedora 18 used a periodic timer for each CPU. This timer prevents the CPU from truly going idle ..."" I deducted this from the sentence a little further where it is mentioned that only from Fedora 18 the idle CPU state is tickles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 842190] New: Cpufreq governor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842190 Bug ID: 842190 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Cpufreq governor Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: h479627(a)rtrtr.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 832179] New: Power management guide is wrong for frequency scaling in Fedora 17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jan '18

29 Jan '18

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832179 Bug ID: 832179 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: r.landmann(a)redhat.com Summary: Power management guide is wrong for frequency scaling in Fedora 17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: jnm11(a)cam.ac.uk Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: power-management-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: Power management guide is wrong https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/Power_Management_Guide/… Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 the location of the cpufreq directory is misspecified it is /lib/modules/3.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64/kernel/drivers/cpufreq There are no modules acpi-cpufreq or p4-clockmod available is acpi-cpufreq directly compiled in. the cpuspeed package is mentioned for the userspace governor but no package exists in fedora 17. I have been completely unable to figure out the following use case. My laptop overheats and powers off if the cpu load is high for too long. There should be a cpu governor or userspace daemon that reduces frequency when the temperature gets too high. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 8

[Bug 915751] New: Remove BuildArch: noarch from the meta package example
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915751 Bug ID: 915751 Summary: Remove BuildArch: noarch from the meta package example Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: software-collections-guide Severity: high Priority: high Reporter: pkovar(a)redhat.com Remove BuildArch: noarch from the meta package example in: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html… (Changed in scl-utils-20121110.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 769438] New: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=769438 Summary: [PATCH] Fix syntax of code examples within rpm-guide-programming-python.xml Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: rpm-guide AssignedTo: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: dmalcolm(a)redhat.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 548940 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=548940 Patch to Rpm Guide to fix rpm-guide-programming-python.xml Unfortunately the examples of Python code within the RPM guide have been thoroughly broken since the initial conversion to DocBook, due to the way Python treats leading whitespace as significant. I'm attaching a patch which overhauls this page, so that the code examples are syntactically valid. See the notes in the patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

2 5

[Bug 1253462] New: Error in http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/ch16s03s05.html
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253462 Bug ID: 1253462 Summary: Error in http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Docum entation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/ch16s03s05.html Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Severity: low Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: nbasanes(a)cisco.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 1062752 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1062752&action=edit This attachment is a screenshot of a more readable result. Description of problem: The Python code section at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… has an error in the following code: # Dependencies print "Provides:" print h.dsFromHeader('providename') print "Requires:" print h.dsFromHeader('requirename') if h.dsFromHeader('obsoletename'): print "Obsoletes:" print h.dsFromHeader('obsoletename') if h.dsFromHeader('conflictname'): print "Conflicts:" print h.dsFromHeader('conflictname') print h.dsFromHeader('conflictname') outputs <rpm.ds object at 0xb77584b8>. h.dsFromHeader('conflictname'), without the "print" word, outputs it right. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Copy the python code from the page to a file called rpminfo.py on a computer that has the older version of Python, Python 2. 2. Run the Python code, by running the "cd" command until you get to the folder that contains rpminfo.py. 3. Run rpminfo.py by entering the command python rpminfo.py. Actual results: Provides: <rpm.ds object at 0xb77584b8> Requires: <rpm.ds object at 0xb77584b8> Expected results: Provides: P config(httpd) = 2.2.15-39.el6.centos Requires: R libapr-1.so.0 Additional info: The members of the object returned by dsFromHeader have integer indexes, since the following code produces a more readable result: # Dependencies print "Provides:" print h.dsFromHeader('providename')[0] print "Requires:" print h.dsFromHeader('requirename')[0] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 4

[Bug 1163568] New: POSIX capabilities "%caps" macro not mentioned anyhwere
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163568 Bug ID: 1163568 Summary: POSIX capabilities "%caps" macro not mentioned anyhwere Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Severity: medium Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: matt(a)nightrealms.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The RPM guide doesn't mention the "%caps" macro which can be used to set a file's POSIX capabilities (see http://linux.die.net/man/7/capabilities) It should go in chapter 9, section 5.4, at URL http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1115469] New: Link to full documentation is incorrect
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115469 Bug ID: 1115469 Summary: Link to full documentation is incorrect Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: msuchy(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: This page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… links to /usr/share/doc/rpm-devel-4.1/apidocs/html/group__python.html Which does not exist on recent Fedoras. RPM API is documented at: /usr/share/doc/rpm-apidocs/index.html And I did not find documentation for rpm-python itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1025475] New: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1025475 Bug ID: 1025475 Summary: typo in yum update for kexi-mysql Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: admin(a)velusuniverse.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: calligra-kexi-driver-mysql summary says mysqwl driver for kexi but shouldnt it say mysql driver for kexi ?? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: use the yum extender andd look up calligra-kexi-driver-mysql Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: ummary says mysqwl driver for kexi Expected results: mysql driver for kexi Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1017792] New: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1017792 Bug ID: 1017792 Summary: %verify doesn't know symlink, maj min Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: In the "Verifying the %files section" chapter of the RPM guide [1], there is written "symlink", but it seems RPM uses "link" instead. Also I had trouble with the "maj" and "min", I guess there is "rdev" used instead. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. See the "Verifying the %files section" chapter Actual results: There are symlink, maj and min Expected results: The link and probably rdev Additional info: [1] http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 2

[Bug 1003962] New: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003962 Bug ID: 1003962 Summary: RPM scriptlet -p option not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: rpm-guide Assignee: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com Reporter: daniel.neuberger(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bcotton+fedora(a)gmail.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The fedora RPM guide does not document the -p option that can be passed to the RPM scriptlets. It should probably be located here http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM…, but I looked through the entire guide and couldn't find it. The only only place I could find it documented is here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets, but what it says is wrong. It says: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which allows the scriptlet to invoke a single program directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs. (ie: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig)" A more accurate description is: "The basic syntax is similar to the %build, %install, and other sections of the rpm spec file. The scripts support a special flag, -p which specifies the interPreter that should be used to run the script (the default is /bin/sh). Sometimes the -p option is used with no body in order to run a single command directly rather than having to spawn a shell to invoke the programs (i.e. %post -p /sbin/ldconfig). Note that this form requires that there be nothing but white space (not even comments) until the next section begins." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 1057882] New: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057882 Bug ID: 1057882 Summary: Fedora - Installation Quick Start Guide - An update of the Czech translation ready Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an updated Czech version of the F20 Installation Quick Start Guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Mostly grammar errors found in current version. Expected results: An updated Czech translation published - missing translation(s) added, translation revision and precision. Additional info: If the bug BZ#1056196 is a serious obstacle, publish this update once the bug is resolved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1050903] New: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050903 Bug ID: 1050903 Summary: Fedora - burning ISO images to disc - Updated Czech translation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: josef.hruska(a)upcmail.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Description of problem: Please publish an update of the Czech translation of Burning ISO images to disc guide Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Translation update - missing translation, revision and precision. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1365347] New: Please Publish edits made to virt-getting-started and Release notes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365347 Bug ID: 1365347 Summary: Please Publish edits made to virt-getting-started and Release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: grundblom(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Hello, I have made corrections to the release notes, and I would like to request to have them published to the website (docs.fedoraproject.org) Also, I would like to request that the Virtualization Getting Started Guide become available on the website (docs.fedoraproject.org) The Virtualization Getting Started Guide has been migrated to: https://pagure.io/virt-getting-started-guide Let me know if you need more information or I have missed a step in this process to get these published. Thank you very much! -Glen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 3

[Bug 1276867] New: Packaging:SourceURL#Git Tags is erroneous for GitHub repository
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276867 Bug ID: 1276867 Summary: Packaging:SourceURL#Git Tags is erroneous for GitHub repository Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: high Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: francis.andre.kampbell(a)orange.fr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Hi The documentation about specifying SourceURL at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL, chapter Git Tags is erroneous setup should be %prep %setup -qn %{name}-%{gittag0} [GitHub] instead of %prep %setup -qn %{name}-%{version} [GitHub] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 985020] New: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985020 Bug ID: 985020 Summary: explain types of rpm packages (what are they for) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: bvoperdf21(a)mt2014.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Description of problem: First I'd like to thank for the awesome documentaions available. Also +1 for the export function (PDF,html-single,...). Looking at the packagers guide I missed some information. It would be nice if you also tell what kind of rpm packages are out there. What I found so far: .rpm .src.rpm .debugsource.... .debuginfo.... For example I still don't know if the debugsource is needed when using gdb for debugging or if the debuginfo package is enough. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):Edition 18.0.1 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Pac… 2.read everything Actual results: no description of the defferent types of rpm packages Expected results: find description of the defferent types of rpm packages and what they are used for/by. Additional info: would be nice to have this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa November 2017