docs-qa October 2019

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
24 discussions

[Bug 1662306] New: TigerVNC Configuration Page out of date
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662306 Bug ID: 1662306 Summary: TigerVNC Configuration Page out of date Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: colin.henry(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Documentation does not reflect current file configuration Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 29 How reproducible: Try and follow the instructions on the configuration page, it tells you to change settings that aren't there. For instance, users are told to edit the and change: ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/bin/vncserver %i -geometry 1280x1024" PIDFile=/home/USER/.vnc/%H%i.pid Whereas the actual file contains: ExecStart=/usr/bin/vncserver -autokill %i PIDFile=/home/<USER>/.vnc/%H%i.pid Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to the documentation page: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f29/system-administrators-guide… 2. Install tigervnc-server 3. Look at the configuration file /lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service Actual results: The files differ significantly, also following the instructions in the configuration file fails to start vnc successfully, but I'll file a bug for that separately. Expected results: Configuration documentation should match the files on the host Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1706205] New: fedora 30 kde live image contains the squashfs image from fedora 27 and its gnome
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 26 May '20

26 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1706205 Bug ID: 1706205 Summary: fedora 30 kde live image contains the squashfs image from fedora 27 and its gnome Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: about-fedora Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: rob.verduijn(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When booting the recovery option you get the squashfs image from the image found in the LiveOS folder This is a gnome image (a bit strange on a kde live image) And it is from fedora27 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora 30 kde live image iso How reproducible: boot the recovery option from that iso and you will see Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: gnome squashfs image from fedora27 Expected results: kde squashfs image from fedora30 Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1694217] New: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Nov '19

08 Nov '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694217 Bug ID: 1694217 Summary: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: noloader(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I'm trying to figure out how to test a 'dnf remove'. I tried 'dnf remove --dry-run' but dnf retirned "dnf remove: error: unrecognized arguments: --dry-run". The man page does not discuss how to perform a dry run. Please add a treatment for performing a dry run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1767317] New: GPG Verification of Fedora 31 download is not possible
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Nov '19

02 Nov '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767317 Bug ID: 1767317 Summary: GPG Verification of Fedora 31 download is not possible Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: security-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: xwarman(a)posteo.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkennedy(a)redhat.com, security-guide-list(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I tried to verify download of FEDORA 31 with GPG as described here: https://getfedora.org/security/ (German Version) If I download GPG Keys, Fedora 31 is not known: "gpg: Schlüssel E08E7E629DB62FB1: "Fedora 28 (28) <fedora-28(a)fedoraproject.org>" nicht geändert gpg: Schlüssel A20AA56B429476B4: "Fedora 29 (29) <fedora-29(a)fedoraproject.org>" nicht geändert gpg: Schlüssel EF3C111FCFC659B9: "Fedora (30) <fedora-30-primary(a)fedoraproject.org>" nicht geändert gpg: Schlüssel 3B49DF2A0608B895: "EPEL (6) <epel(a)fedoraproject.org>" nicht geändert gpg: Schlüssel 6A2FAEA2352C64E5: "Fedora EPEL (7) <epel(a)fedoraproject.org>" nicht geändert gpg: Schlüssel 7BB90722DBBDCF7C: "Fedora (iot 2019) <fedora-iot-2019(a)fedoraproject.org>" nicht geändert gpg: Anzahl insgesamt bearbeiteter Schlüssel: 6" So, I cannot verify the checksum file: gpg --verify-files Fedora-Workstation-31-1.9-x86_64-CHECKSUM gpg: Signatur vom Fr 25 Okt 2019 15:09:48 CEST gpg: mittels RSA-Schlüssel 50CB390B3C3359C4 gpg: Signatur kann nicht geprüft werden: Kein öffentlicher Schlüssel Also, if I try to use fingerprint: gpg2 --fingerprint 4096R/3C3359C4 2019-02-18 gpg: error reading key: Kein öffentlicher Schlüssel Actual results: No pub key for fedora 31 download found. Expected results: Successful verfification with gpg Additional info: German language version of documentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1857 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1766934] New: Fedora 31 Common bugs page links to wrong release notes URL
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766934 Bug ID: 1766934 Summary: Fedora 31 Common bugs page links to wrong release notes URL Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: release-notes Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: tswsl1989(a)sucs.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: F31 common bugs page at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F31_bugs#Release_Notes points to a bad release notes page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/31/html/Release_Notes/ Correct link appears to be https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f31/release-notes/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1856 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 29 Oct '19

29 Oct '19

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1855 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 28 Oct '19

28 Oct '19

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1854 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Oct '19

25 Oct '19

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1851 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa October 2019