docs-qa October 2019

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
24 discussions

[Bug 1435506] first search result for "list of files in RPM package" is the *Romanian* documentation
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Oct '19

08 Oct '19

1 0

[Bug 1615208] /var diskspace is under specified
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 06 Oct '19

06 Oct '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615208 --- Comment #1 from Leslie Satenstein <lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com> --- Problem is being addressed with log sizes and with dnf registering multiple duplicate entries in each of it's log. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 1758617] New: Description of interface file/filecontext file
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '19

04 Oct '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758617 Bug ID: 1758617 Summary: Description of interface file/filecontext file Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: selinux-user-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: hein-bloed92(a)gmx.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mprpic(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: In my understanding the paragraph "NAME.if - interface file" in Chapter 5.2 describes the file content file. So the headline of the paragraph should be something like "NAME.fc - file context file" Best Regrads Marcus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 929426] firewalld: forward chain
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Oct '19

04 Oct '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929426 Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuju(a)iki.fi --- Comment #10 from Juha Tuomala <tuju(a)iki.fi> --- Ha, I was wondering the exactly the same thing and found this bug entry. :) The whole point firewalld was (I assume) of having a 'daemon' and a user inteface, which would together provide a safe way to make modifications to traffic filtering rules without sawing your own branch off where you were sitting on. Every network specialist knows this risk. Well, it turns out that firewalld is what I suspected from the start: a workstation firewall solution, not a network firewall solution. Which is funny as the term firewall is historically just about the network device (a wall), not about host filtering. Which also funny, that it comes with predefined 'zones' like 'dmz'. Well, where the hell you're supposed to have that DMZ-zone else than in your backbone network which is protected by network firewall? Maybe with VPN you could connect it to your workstation and it would make sense. Or not. Looks like modifying the dmz service rules go into IN_dmz_allow chain, that is called by hopping chain to antoher: INPUT INPUT_ZONES IN_dmz IN_dmz_allow and in case of network firewall, that would be traffic directed to firewall itself. If it would be traffic that firewall would be routing through itself, it should be in FORWARD. Using --direct removes the whole point of having that daemon+userinterface and removes the benefits they provide. Only thing left are the other limitations, missing documenation, weird "concepts" and broken XML (and who knows what else crap). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa October 2019