November 2019 - docs-qa - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1875 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1872 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1871 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1870 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1869 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1868 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1694217] New: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694217 Bug ID: 1694217 Summary: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: noloader(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I'm trying to figure out how to test a 'dnf remove'. I tried 'dnf remove --dry-run' but dnf retirned "dnf remove: error: unrecognized arguments: --dry-run". The man page does not discuss how to perform a dry run. Please add a treatment for performing a dry run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

4 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 3 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again tomorrow if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 3 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1865 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40...

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1010477] Using own certificates/keys with SecureBoot isn't documented enough

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010477 --- Comment #4 from nicolasoliver03(a)gmail.com --- Hello, This is still current. The Fedora documentation of secure boot is incomplete and dated (the current one is a draft for Fedora 18) There are some instructions on how to sign kernel modules, but it is also inaccurate per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615744 Public information found by web search usually recommends nuking PK,KEK,DB,DBX and creating your owns, which is something extreme if the only thing you want to do is to boot a custom kernel. (e.g. http://kroah.com/log/blog/2013/09/02/booting-a-self-signed-linux-kernel/ from 2013). This also invalidates any existing signed kernel and makes you have to sign them with your custom keys. It is not explained how to append a KEK and DB. It is also not clear how kernel modules reacts to secure boot, given that the functionality to force modules to be signed in secure boot mode comes and goes (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696671) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1149926] Опечатки

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149926 Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |pbokoc(a)redhat.com Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed| |2019-11-07 15:21:35 --- Comment #2 from Petr Bokoc <pbokoc(a)redhat.com> --- No longer relevant, closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

4 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa November 2019