docs-qa March 2019

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
3 discussions

[Bug 1662306] New: TigerVNC Configuration Page out of date
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662306 Bug ID: 1662306 Summary: TigerVNC Configuration Page out of date Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: colin.henry(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Documentation does not reflect current file configuration Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 29 How reproducible: Try and follow the instructions on the configuration page, it tells you to change settings that aren't there. For instance, users are told to edit the and change: ExecStart=/sbin/runuser -l USER -c "/usr/bin/vncserver %i -geometry 1280x1024" PIDFile=/home/USER/.vnc/%H%i.pid Whereas the actual file contains: ExecStart=/usr/bin/vncserver -autokill %i PIDFile=/home/<USER>/.vnc/%H%i.pid Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to the documentation page: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f29/system-administrators-guide… 2. Install tigervnc-server 3. Look at the configuration file /lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service Actual results: The files differ significantly, also following the instructions in the configuration file fails to start vnc successfully, but I'll file a bug for that separately. Expected results: Configuration documentation should match the files on the host Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1694217] New: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 08 Nov '19

08 Nov '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694217 Bug ID: 1694217 Summary: dnf man page does not discuss a dry run Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: noloader(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I'm trying to figure out how to test a 'dnf remove'. I tried 'dnf remove --dry-run' but dnf retirned "dnf remove: error: unrecognized arguments: --dry-run". The man page does not discuss how to perform a dry run. Please add a treatment for performing a dry run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1687654] New: %posttrans $1's value is incorrectly documented
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Mar '19

11 Mar '19

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687654 Bug ID: 1687654 Summary: %posttrans $1's value is incorrectly documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: packager-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: t0dd(a)protonmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_synt… For %posttrans, it is listed that $1 will be 0 for during both installs and upgrades. I have not tested installs yet, but at least for upgrades, the value is 1. Not 0. Also... this document needs a bunch of editing. Lots of obvious typos and just needs some proofreading. Is there a git repo for this stuff? If so, heck, I would fix it myself. Anyway... bug. Thanks! -taw (or t0dd) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa March 2019