docs-qa June 2023

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

26 discussions

[Bug 1997970] New: Typo on release page of a package on package.fedoraproject.org
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997970 Bug ID: 1997970 Summary: Typo on release page of a package on package.fedoraproject.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: homepage Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: eva.timbs(a)you-spam.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora When clicking on a release of a package the new site, e.g. [1], displays a back link near the top with the description "↵ Retrun to the main page of <pkg>". Note the misspelled "Return". [1] https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/kernel/kernel/fedora-rawhide.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 2011723] New: Backport fix to ps man page documentation
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011723 Bug ID: 2011723 Summary: Backport fix to ps man page documentation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: mallika.bachan(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Document URL: Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011723

1 2

[Bug 1878577] New: Grammar Mistake
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878577 Bug ID: 1878577 Summary: Grammar Mistake Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: documentation-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ali.cruz(a)me.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Group: fedora_contrib_private Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1714711 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1714711&action=edit Grammar mistake Document URL: selinux-managing-confined-services-guide Section Number and Name: LOGO Describe the issue: DOUMENTACIÓN de Fedora Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: selinux-managing-confined-services-guide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1850288] New: Page Missing - v22 - multiboot-guide - "6.3.2.2. Reinstalling GRUB on BIOS systems."
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850288 Bug ID: 1850288 Summary: Page Missing - v22 - multiboot-guide - "6.3.2.2. Reinstalling GRUB on BIOS systems." Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: multiboot-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: sy(a)josiahluscher.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: me(a)petetravis.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Entire documentation section missing. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): v22 How reproducible: Very Easy Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the following page with web browser: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Multiboot_Guide/GRUB-re… Actual results: Header is displayed with no content. Expected results: Enlightenment(?) Additional info: My server won't boot! Plasse HALP! [Sad Human] -- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1901486] New: Release notes should mention fixes for older systems impacted by security tightening in F33
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901486 Bug ID: 1901486 Summary: Release notes should mention fixes for older systems impacted by security tightening in F33 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: release-notes Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: russ+bugzilla-redhat(a)gloomytrousers.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: On booting my system after upgrade from F31 to F33, neither httpd nor dovecot would start. This system is quite an old one that's been upgraded through many versions of Fedora. This appears to be a result of "Strong Crypto Settings - Phase 2" mentioned on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f33/release-notes/sysadmin/Secu… The relevant errors were: * Apache (/var/log/httpd/error_log): [Mon Nov 23 11:44:11.517501 2020] [ssl:emerg] [pid 13680:tid 13680] AH02562: Failed to configure certificate gigalith.gloomytrousers.co.uk:443:0 (with chain), check /etc/pki/tls/certs/localhost.crt [Mon Nov 23 11:44:11.517525 2020] [ssl:emerg] [pid 13680:tid 13680] SSL Library Error: error:140AB18F:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_certificate:ee key too small This cert was 1024 bit, first generated in 2010. The fix was to remove /etc/pki/tls/certs/localhost.crt and /etc/pki/tls/private/localhost.key then run /usr/libexec/httpd-ssl-gencerts. * Dovecot (journal): Nov 23 12:35:27 gigalith.gloomytrousers.co.uk dovecot[31160]: config: Warning: please set ssl_dh=</etc/dovecot/dh.pem Nov 23 12:35:27 gigalith.gloomytrousers.co.uk dovecot[31160]: config: Warning: You can generate it with: dd if=/var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.dat bs=1 skip=88 | openssl dhparam -inform der > /etc/dovecot/dh.pem /etc/dovecot/dh.pem was present, dating from from 2013. The recommended fix did NOT work (I recall having run this in the past) - it just generated an identical file. The actual fix (stumbled across in bug 1882939) was to regenerate the DH params with `openssl dhparam -out /etc/dovecot/dh.pem 4096` (this took 32 mins on my machine!) I suspect Exim might also have similar problems for some people, although I didn't have a problem (my cert was 2048 bit from 2010, although I think I generated this in a non-default way at the time). The fix in this case would be to remove /etc/pki/tls/certs/exim.pem and /etc/pki/tls/private/exim.pem then run /usr/libexec/exim-gen-cert. I suggest these workarounds which might be required for older systems be documented on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f33/release-notes/sysadmin/Secu… - along with anything else that might suffer from similar issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 2021927] New: Updates and enhancements needed
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021927 Bug ID: 2021927 Summary: Updates and enhancements needed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: freeipa-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ricky.tigg(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mkosek(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1841070 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1841070&action=edit Observations and suggestions Hello. Here is a well composed and written document that has aged without having suffered hard the passage of time. Well done. According to my observations, some few sections deserve to be up-to-date as they lead the reader to conclude that the guide is obsolete and therefore do not apply to contemporary release of Fedora products. Who knows, maybe the required rectifications could be produced in correlation with the up-coming releases of Fedora 36 products – that’s Fedora 2x18! Source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org | Fedora 18 | Edition 3.1.5 | Ella Deon Lackey | Release year: 2012 | Version number of component freeipa this document was made against: 2.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021927

1 2

[Bug 1889931] New: feature request: release notes document status of systemd-homed for install and upgrade to fedora33
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889931 Bug ID: 1889931 Summary: feature request: release notes document status of systemd-homed for install and upgrade to fedora33 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: release-notes Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: william.garber(a)att.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: would like some easy to find documentation on status of systemd-homed setup for install and/or upgrade to fedora33. i.e. what happens to standard home directory on upgrade. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fedora 32 upgrade to fedora 33 How reproducible: would like to know how this works before installing. Additional info: was not so easy to find on web. should be more easy to find on fedora website. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1831872] New: Legacy DNF enable repo documentation from gnome-wiki
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831872 Bug ID: 1831872 Summary: Legacy DNF enable repo documentation from gnome-wiki Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: documentation-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: csiterallat(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Document URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/StackTraces#gdb Section Number and Name: nstalling debuginfo RPMs using DNF Describe the issue: This command is doesn't work, it's Legacy! dnf --enablerepo=fedora-debuginfo --enablerepo=updates-debuginfo install <pkg-spec>-debuginfo Suggestions for improvement: TRUE ENABLE REPO COMMAND ON FEDORA 32: sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora-debuginfo updates-debuginfo Additional information: This link is come frome gnome-wiki (https://wiki.gnome.org/Community/GettingInTouch/Bugzilla/GettingTraces/Dist…) I try to install debuginfo packages for totem, but this documentation is not so helpful :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1815635] New: Fedora 31 bluetooth stopped working
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815635 Bug ID: 1815635 Summary: Fedora 31 bluetooth stopped working Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: technical-notes Severity: high Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: super250(a)g.uky.edu QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: bluetooth stopped working Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 31 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.\<edit\> /usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service \<add '-d' to ExecStart line as option to bluetoothd\> 2. systemctl daemon-reload 3. systemctl restart bluetooth (Capture the logs to put in bugzilla report) journalctl -r -u bluetooth > /tmp/bluetoothd.out Actual results: bluetooth.service: Service has no ExecStart=, ExecStop=, or SuccessAction=. Refusing Expected results: bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Wed 2017-10-04 16:07:40 EDT; 1 day 22h ago Docs: man:bluetoothd(8) Main PID: 27427 (bluetoothd) Status: "Running" Tasks: 1 (limit: 4915) CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service └─27427 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1790615] New: AppStream (formerly AppData) packaging guidelines use outdated terms and example code
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790615 Bug ID: 1790615 Summary: AppStream (formerly AppData) packaging guidelines use outdated terms and example code Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: packager-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: andrew(a)tosk.in QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pkovar(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora I'm referring to the docs at "Packaging Guidelines for AppData Files" <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/> The AppStream project has made a number of changes since these Fedora guidelines were written, and the conflicting information confused me at first, as I looked up how to add AppStream metadata to a new package I'm working on... * In the Fedora guidelines, the second sentence ("Installed .appdata.xml files MUST follow the AppData specification page.") links to <http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/appdata/> but this URL now redirects to <https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Quickstart.html#se…> * As far as I can tell, the AppStream specification no longer uses the filename to distinguish between applications and addons, and all AppStream metadata files should now be named .metainfo.xml. Files for GUI applications are no longer named .appdata.xml. See <https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Quickstart.html#se…> * The example .appdata.xml file in the Fedora guidelines is therefore also out of date. The current AppStream spec, for example, states that the component type should be "desktop-application" instead of just "desktop". Unless I'm misunderstanding something, the Fedora guidelines here will need to be rewritten somewhat. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa June 2023