Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=901704
Ben Cotton bcotton+fedora@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED CC| |bcotton+fedora@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Ben Cotton bcotton+fedora@gmail.com --- QA failed.
- Publican entities are referenced with &ENTITY; so it should be "&PRODUCT;"
- Not all replacements make sense. In some cases keeping "Fedora" hard-coded is more correct: - Author_Group.xml, Lines 42 and 51 (author affiliations will not change if this guide is reused for another product) - Basic_Hardening.xml, Line 32 (the '16's only make sense in a Fedora context), Line 41 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - Book_Info.xml, Lines 7,10,13 (I think Publican has problems with entities in the *_Info.xml files. It makes sense to leave 'Fedora' in this file anyway, since any reuse will necessarily involve editing this file) - Encryption.xml, Line 21 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - Exploits.xml, Line 35 (the '12' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - Firewall.xml, Line 621 (the '12' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - LUKSDiskEncryption.xml, Lines 13,61 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - Nmap.xml, Line 11 (the '10' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - Revision_History.xml - revert all references back to 'Fedora' - SSO_Overview.xml, Line 67 (the '5.2' only makes sense in a Fedora context) - Secure_Installation.xml, Line 28 (the '9' only makes sense in a Fedora context)
Unrelated observation: Kerberos.xml, Line 331: the < and > saround 'version-number' should be removed. DocBook's <replaceable> tag pair will properly format the file name.