Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450331
Summary: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID
problem)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: czar(a)acm.org
QAContact: stickster(a)gmail.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449299
There is a lack of documentation on restoring a system from bare metal. I have
found (see reference) that restore the root ("/") is not as simple as as just
executing the restore command when running in rescue mode.
With the current emphasis being place on use of UUIDs in both Fedora and RHEL,
the whole business of UUIDs need to be better documented.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CMS for docs.fp.orghttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504066
Summary: CMS for docs.fp.org
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Zikula chosen, working on test instances and project plan with Zikula team
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: SRPMs fail to build in Koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513907
Summary: SRPMs fail to build in Koji
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: high
Component: publican
AssignedTo: jfearn(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jfearn(a)redhat.com, fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com,
mmcallis(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: SRPMs fail to build in Koji due to the following error:
Processing files: fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-16.fc12.noarch
error: Two files on one line: /usr/share/applications/Fedora
error: File must begin with "/": Projectfedora-security-guide-en-US.desktop
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.44-0.fc11
Possible Fix: Remove the %{?vendoropt} from
desktop-file-install %{?vendoropt}
--dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications %{name}.desktop
or remove %{vendor} all together.
I'll be testing this soon to see if I can provide a patch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Publican migration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504064
Summary: Publican migration
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Figure out steps for a migration of each guide; track that in each guide's
Trac. Installation Guide migration branch in git; task in progress, possible
work at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraEvents/FAD/FAD_SCaLE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Toolchain next steps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504063
Summary: Toolchain next steps
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Sorting out what fedora-doc-utils does, where to use Publican, etc. --
Principals to discuss status, progress, direction on IRC.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Student mentoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504067
Summary: Student mentoring
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Focus on wiki and entry tasks; regular check-ins; keep scope and choices narrow
where there is lots of room to succeed and learn; FLOSS Proj Mgmt session at
FUDCon?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Docs to fedorahosted.orghttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504069
Summary: Docs to fedorahosted.org
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
75% complete?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Update helping-hand docs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504062
Summary: Update helping-hand docs
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Review, organize, rewrite, simplify, and categorize Docs team helper docs. --
waiting on page renaming and categorization
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Oracle-xe page for Spacewalk doesn't work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514046
Summary: Oracle-xe page for Spacewalk doesn't work
Product: Fedora Hosted Projects
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Deployment_Guide
AssignedTo: mhideo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mschwage(a)gmail.com
QAContact: rlerch(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Sorry about the classification of this. I didn't see Spacewalk anywhere in
Bugzilla! Anyway, on the webpage
https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/OracleXeSetup#Install, the install
instructions don't work as advertised. There, it says
"Configure the Oracle XE database by running
# /etc/init.d/oracle-xe configure"
This did not set the system/sys name correctly. Yes, I know, the oracle-xe
command comes from Oracle themselves, but on my RHEL53 machine it just refused
to set the password correctly. Did I try to do it 10 times or more? Yes I
did, and it did not work at all. Did I fat finger my password every single
lousy time I tried it? No I did not, for I was able to create my password as
easy as you please using my workaround below.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
oracle-xe-univ-10.2.0.1-1.0
oracle-instantclient-basic-10.2.0.4-1
oracle-instantclient-sqlplus-10.2.0.4-1
How reproducible:
Every time.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Do this on RHEL53 x86_64. Install the Oracle-XE software as listed.
2. Follow the instructions on
https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/OracleXeSetup#Install, up to and
including the "Test Your Connection with SQLPlus" part.
3. You fail to login.
Actual results:
Fail to login.
Expected results:
Successful login.
Additional info:
The workaround is to perform the following after running /etc/init.d/oracle-xe
configure :
su - oracle
. /usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/bin/oracle_env.sh
/usr/lib/oracle/10.2.0.4/client64/bin/sqlplus /NOLOG
CONNECT / AS SYSDBA
alter user sys identified by password;
alter user system identified by password;
sqlplus64 'sys@xe as sysdba'
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
At FUDcon, Florian Festi approached me about Docs updating the RPM Guide and
the book, Maximum RPM, both of which have gotten a little stale. The RPM
Guide was already on our radar, and Ben Cotton has taken point on getting
that ready to be worked on.
Maximum RPM is currently hosted at rpm.org, and does not appear to have been
built with the old doc tools. There seem to be some specific dependencies
on Fedora 8, so there will be a little work converting it to something more
up to date.
The other issue, though, is licensing. This probably won't be difficult to
deal with but it is something that needs to be addressed. The current
copyright holder is Red Hat.
We will probably discuss this at an upcoming Docs Team meeting, but I did
want to give everyone a heads-up that this is going on. We may also want to
carry on some discussion on an rpm.org mailing list so that community is
also aware of the effort.
At this point not much has actually happened. Ben has moved the RPM Guide
to git, but I don't think anything else has happened there, I have looked at
the Maximum RPM sources and verified Florian's assessment that this isn't a
straightforward build, and quaid is aware of the licensing issues.
The RPM Guide is at:
git.fedoraproject.org/rpmguide.git
Maximum RPM is at
rpm.org/git/max-rpm.git
--McD