Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627417
Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: nathan.thomas(a)peacenik.co.uk
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com,
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
We have a large variety of documentation guides serving a wide range of
different users. It may be difficult for users arriving at docs.fp.o to know
where to start, especially if they are new to Fedora/Linux and are unfamiliar
with some of the technical terms.
A note on the landing page suggesting a sensible starting point for new users
could help alleviate this problem. Eg:
"New to Fedora? You can try Fedora on your PC without touching your existing
installation by following the Live Image Guide."
The end of the Live Image guide helpfully points users to the Installation
guide if they want to install :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450331
Summary: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID
problem)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: czar(a)acm.org
QAContact: stickster(a)gmail.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449299
There is a lack of documentation on restoring a system from bare metal. I have
found (see reference) that restore the root ("/") is not as simple as as just
executing the restore command when running in rescue mode.
With the current emphasis being place on use of UUIDs in both Fedora and RHEL,
the whole business of UUIDs need to be better documented.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Direct links to RNs broken.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595695
Summary: Direct links to RNs broken.
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
* Previously, the release notes were located at
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
* Their location has changed to release specific URLs.
* A link to the release notes is provided in fedora-bookmarks.
* fedora-bookmarks are imported by the browser only on *first launch* so as to
not overwrite user modifications.
The new bookmarks layout causes two problems:
1. Nobody filed a fedora-bookmarks bug so Fedora 13 (and anyone on F-11 or F-12
etc) will default to going to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
which is a 404. Since the bookmarks can only be imported on first launch, we
cannot push an update to fix this if the user has launched the browser (which
is extremely likely).
2. Even if I were to fix the bookmarks page to point directly to a specific
release version (which again would take effect only if someone would yum update
before launching Firefox), then if anyone updated to F-14, the bookmark would
not change and would still point to e.g. F-13.
So, I do not think that we should put version specific information into our
bookmarks URLs. To solve both of the above problems, I believe we should try to
do some User-Agent detection and redirection. Fedora browsers have an RPM NVR
attached to them.
For example:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100517
Fedora/3.6.4-1.fc13 Firefox/3.6.4
This tells us that the user's installed language is es-ES and it's a Fedora
browser, specifically running F-13. We should then redirect queries to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/es-ES/Fedora/13/html/Release_Notes/index.html
If we cannot figure any information out about the Fedora release or language
(or there are no relnotes in that language), I propose the default redirect
should be to the en-US version of the latest Fedora release notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CMS for docs.fp.orghttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504066
Summary: CMS for docs.fp.org
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Zikula chosen, working on test instances and project plan with Zikula team
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: SRPMs fail to build in Koji
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513907
Summary: SRPMs fail to build in Koji
Product: Fedora
Version: 11
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: high
Component: publican
AssignedTo: jfearn(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jfearn(a)redhat.com, fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com,
mmcallis(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: SRPMs fail to build in Koji due to the following error:
Processing files: fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-16.fc12.noarch
error: Two files on one line: /usr/share/applications/Fedora
error: File must begin with "/": Projectfedora-security-guide-en-US.desktop
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.44-0.fc11
Possible Fix: Remove the %{?vendoropt} from
desktop-file-install %{?vendoropt}
--dir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_datadir}/applications %{name}.desktop
or remove %{vendor} all together.
I'll be testing this soon to see if I can provide a patch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Hello:
I was reading the Release Notes (for fun - to see what's in this
release... there are some very exciting things!), when I realized that
there is still documentation for Systemd. My memory and this systemd
"Features" page[1] both indicate that this is being postponed to Fedora
15, so should not be included with these release notes.
Christopher.
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/systemd
Hi,
I'm Mario Santagiuliana, I'm a translator of Italian team.
We have got some translated document but this document need review.
I would like to ask:
a) don't public documents that are not checked;
b) give us time to review this document and than public them.
Thank you very much.
--
Mario Santagiuliana
www.marionline.it
I do see a lot of white quiestion marks on a black quarry background on
the http://docs.fedoraproject.org/cs-CZ/index.html on the left side, where
some content used to bee. Am I the only one?
Thanks
Adam Pribyl
I was seeing it on english. Some langs I looked also had the ???? But some
had translated strings. I looked at both f13 and 14 docs. I was using and
updated f13 with firefox and some plugins. I'm on phone now so cannot look.
Susan
On Oct 31, 2010 5:32 PM, "Eric "Sparks" Christensen" <
sparks(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:43, John J. McDonough <wb8rcr(a)arrl.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 16...
Which makes me wonder why I'm not seeing it.
--Eric
--
docs mailing list
docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/...
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: davidk(a)davidaklein.com <davidk(a)davidaklein.com>
Date: Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 9:02 PM
Subject: Installation misspelled as "insatallation"
To: webmaster(a)fedoraproject.org
Installation is misspelled as "insatallation" on
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Installation_Guide/s1-gu…
.
I thought you'd want to know.
DAK
--
Docs team,
We got this a little while ago and i don't know who is responsible for it,
so I'm sending it to the list.
Sijis