Meeting Reminder
by Eric Christensen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There will be a Docs Meeting today at 2300 UTC in the #fedora-meeting on
Freenode IRC. Come join us!
- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=gYO/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 years, 10 months
Join Page
by David Nalley
I did some editing on the Join Page[1] and stripped the following:
* Reference to downloading the client-side SSL cert from FAS, which I
think is now exclusively used by packagers. (I may be wrong, feel free
to correct me)
* Reference to creating a SSH key. Creating an SSH key, while
important for docs-writers, isn't a requirement for docs, and
something that could likely be handled easier with some hand holding
rather than being listed as a requirement before getting to put your
toes in the water.
Additionally - I'd like to solicity input on removing d-c-l from the
requirements list. d-c-l has a ton of traffic near release (I've had
days where I've generated 400+ messages to d-c-l, and John has had
days that make mine pale by comparison.) I fear that the unsuspecting
new contributor will be overwhelmed with messages, and feel
overwhelmed by joining. Anyone think that this should be abolished, or
should we just add an admon??
Thanks
David Nalley
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Joining_the_Docs_Project#Signing_Up
13 years, 10 months
question about groups
by h.verduguez＠gmail.com
Hi I want to join a group on FAS but I don't know which, could you help me?
I'd like to write manuals, documentation, etc
Thank you
--
Hans
13 years, 10 months
Re: "Fedora Core" heading on the left hand side docs.fp.o landing page?
by Christopher Antila
Hello:
I have to agree with Justin's sentiments here, and would like to suggest
a more marked change to the sidebar. It's less easy to implement then
just changing to "Fedora Core (obsolete)", but it might make it easier
for users to find what they want. It would definitely help to make
clear what versions of Fedora are still officially supported.
The sidebar could look something like this (titles are just tentative):
Officially-Supported Fedora Versions
|- Fedora 13
-- Fedora 12
Obsolete Fedora Versions
|- Fedora 11
|- Fedora 10
...
|- Fedora Core 2
-- Fedora Core 1
Contributed Documentation
(same as now)
Draft Documentation
(same as now)
Also, the version numbers are somewhat difficult for me to read, because
of their size and colour. Including the word/s "Fedora" or "Fedora
Core" in front of the numbers might also help users to visually
recognize the numbers as important.
Overall, the new site seems like a huge improvement on the old one. As
the number of documents grows, the ability to see everything at a glance
is going to be more and more important.
Christopher Antila.
> Hi all,
>
> The recent weekly meeting of fedora docs mentioned some people are not
> aware of "Fedora Core" being the outdated/previous series of Fedora
> releases.
>
>
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-02/fedora_docs.20...
>
> To assist with the effort to educate around this, would it be feasible
> to rename the "Fedora Core" heading on the docs.fp.o site to be "Fedora
> Core (obselete)" ?
>
> Thinking it may be technically easy, with few (any?) bad consequences,
> but also helps make things clear for people who aren't sure.
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
13 years, 10 months
CMS
by Eric Christensen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Last year we were working on getting Zikula packaged and stood up as the
CMS solution for the Docs Project. Fast forward to today and we still
don't have Zikula up but we do have Publican handling the public
front-end for us.
So do we still need to work towards getting Zikula up and running or
should we be working to get the kinks worked out of Publican?
What do we loose by staying with Publican? What do we gain?
What feedback have you received about the Publican front-end?
- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=aPn6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 years, 10 months
Self-Introduction: Ismiatul Rafika, Malang
by fika Chee
Dari: fika Chee <cheefika(a)yahoo.co.id>
Judul:
Kepada: trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Tanggal: Minggu, 6 Juni, 2010, 2:41 AM
Name : Ismiatul Rafika
> Location : Malang , Indonesia
> Login : fika
> Language : Indonesia
> Status : Student
> --
> About me :
> What other projects or writing have you worked on in the past?
>
> > I have already make a project with Desktop, and now I will try to
> study about linux because I have already make a server for my project
> with linux
> What level and type of computer skills do you have?
>
> > i have medium level of computer skill, everyday I use linux but
> beause I'm a new in linux so I use GUI first
> What other skills do you have that might be applicable? User interface
> design, other so-called soft skills (people skills), programming, etc.
>
> > i have skill on web ( PHP ) , Desktop programing ( JAVA , Delphi ,
> Visual Basic , C++, Visual Basic.Net ) , Database (MySQL) , Network
> Management ( Cisco Router )
> What makes you an excellent match for the project?
>
> > i have toeic mark 645/900 , i'm an english debaters in my school, i ever be the best speaker in many competition and i ever win many competition in Malang , because of that i think i can give more contribute to be translator of fedora
13 years, 10 months
(no subject)
by giannhs.var＠thegworld.gr
Yes, but in the guide says that i have to ask in the mailing list
which are the appropriate groups to join for the docs project.It does
not says somewhere the groups :/
Thank you.
13 years, 10 months
IMPORTANT: docs project git repo moving and renaming
by Nick Bebout
The following git repos will be moving sometime Sunday evening. Please
update your .git/config files with the new paths.
For example, where it says:
[remote "origin"]
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
url = ssh://nb@git.fedorahosted.org/git/accessibility-guide.git
Change url to
url = ssh://nb@git.fedorahosted.org/git/docs/accessibility-guide.git
The following git repos will be moving
---------------------------------------
accessibility-guide.git docs/accessibility-guide.git
amateur-radio-guide.git docs/amateur-radio-guide.git
docs-tools.git docs/tools.git
docsite-publican.git docs/docsite-publican.git
documentation-guide.git docs/documentation-guide.git
fedora-doc-utils.git docs/utils.git
installation-quick-start-guide.git docs/installation-quick-start-guide.git
jargon-buster.git docs/jargon-buster.git
respin-guide.git docs/respin-guide.git
rpmguide.git docs/rpm-guide.git
translation-quick-start-guide.git docs/translation-quick-start-guide.git
Virtualization_Guide.git docs/virtualization-guide.git
These will remain in the current location
-----------------------------------------
docs/about-fedora.git
docs/deployment-guide.git
docs/elections-guide.git
docs/homepage.git
docs/install-guide.git
docs/musicians-guide.git
docs/readme-burning-isos.git
docs/readme.git
docs/readme-live-image.git
docs/release-notes.git
docs/technical-notes.git
docs/user-guide.git
docs/web.git (docs-publisher group is required)
Also, please do not add nor approve anyone to the git* groups anymore,
please only use docs, docs-writers, and docs-publishers. docs is a
tracking group for all docs project contributors, docs-writers will grant
commit access to anything except docs/web.git, and docs-publishers will
grant commit access to docs/web.git.
Thank you,
Nick
--
Nick Bebout
Fedora Project Packager/Sysadmin/Webmaster
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
13 years, 10 months
New guide git repo creation
by Nick Bebout
FYI, If you file a hosting request, please remember to mention in the
ticket that it goes under /git/docs/ and that the commit repo is
docs-writers (that no new group creation is necessary).
Also, feel free to assign it directly to me, nb, if you would like.
--
Nick Bebout
Fedora Project Packager/Sysadmin/Webmaster
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
13 years, 10 months
