[Bug 755744] New: typo in PV-Configuring_Additional_Devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: typo in PV-Configuring_Additional_Devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755744
Summary: typo in PV-Configuring_Additional_Devices
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: virtualization-guide
AssignedTo: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: shaiton(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: kwade(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
>From the file available in transifex,
Now you can configure the new network interfaces using
<command>redhat-config-network</command> or Red Hat Enterprise Linux3 or
<command>system-config-network</command> on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and Red
Hat Enterprise Linux 5.
that should be "on" Red Hat.
I could have corrected that now that I have git access, but this git is still
for F14… There were plenty of update about virt since F14, is it outdated?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings#Guides
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years
[Bug 627417] New: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627417
Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: nathan.thomas(a)peacenik.co.uk
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com,
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
We have a large variety of documentation guides serving a wide range of
different users. It may be difficult for users arriving at docs.fp.o to know
where to start, especially if they are new to Fedora/Linux and are unfamiliar
with some of the technical terms.
A note on the landing page suggesting a sensible starting point for new users
could help alleviate this problem. Eg:
"New to Fedora? You can try Fedora on your PC without touching your existing
installation by following the Live Image Guide."
The end of the Live Image guide helpfully points users to the Installation
guide if they want to install :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
8 years, 8 months
[Bug 654484] New: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654484
Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration
Guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: r.landmann(a)redhat.com
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com,
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Please create a component for the Storage Administration Guide; default
assignee should be ddomingo(a)redhat.com
Cheers
Rudi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 450331] New: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID problem)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450331
Summary: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID
problem)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: czar(a)acm.org
QAContact: stickster(a)gmail.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449299
There is a lack of documentation on restoring a system from bare metal. I have
found (see reference) that restore the root ("/") is not as simple as as just
executing the restore command when running in rescue mode.
With the current emphasis being place on use of UUIDs in both Fedora and RHEL,
the whole business of UUIDs need to be better documented.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
10 years, 5 months
[Bug 595695] New: Direct links to RNs broken.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Direct links to RNs broken.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595695
Summary: Direct links to RNs broken.
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
* Previously, the release notes were located at
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
* Their location has changed to release specific URLs.
* A link to the release notes is provided in fedora-bookmarks.
* fedora-bookmarks are imported by the browser only on *first launch* so as to
not overwrite user modifications.
The new bookmarks layout causes two problems:
1. Nobody filed a fedora-bookmarks bug so Fedora 13 (and anyone on F-11 or F-12
etc) will default to going to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
which is a 404. Since the bookmarks can only be imported on first launch, we
cannot push an update to fix this if the user has launched the browser (which
is extremely likely).
2. Even if I were to fix the bookmarks page to point directly to a specific
release version (which again would take effect only if someone would yum update
before launching Firefox), then if anyone updated to F-14, the bookmark would
not change and would still point to e.g. F-13.
So, I do not think that we should put version specific information into our
bookmarks URLs. To solve both of the above problems, I believe we should try to
do some User-Agent detection and redirection. Fedora browsers have an RPM NVR
attached to them.
For example:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100517
Fedora/3.6.4-1.fc13 Firefox/3.6.4
This tells us that the user's installed language is es-ES and it's a Fedora
browser, specifically running F-13. We should then redirect queries to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/es-ES/Fedora/13/html/Release_Notes/index.html
If we cannot figure any information out about the Fedora release or language
(or there are no relnotes in that language), I propose the default redirect
should be to the en-US version of the latest Fedora release notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
11 years
Merging transifex.net duplicated teams
by Kévin Raymond
Hi there,
Since our migration to transifex.net, some teams have lost their
translations because a new team was created (thanks to language mapping
in transifex.net).
There are still some project that need to be merged.
I've written a script[1] used to parse all guides at TXN, and print the
language code which have translations but are not associated to any
teams.
Please find attached the results.
Limitations:
- it was against the fedora-docs release only, not against
all docs! I could have used an other script for that.
I have it around but I would prefer our guides to be on
the fedora-docs release. This refers to[3].
Should I add all in this fedora-docs release? I think so, but
we never finished that…
Should I add all in this fedora-docs release? I think so, but
we never finished that…
There could be an other way, but I think that I've more than needed.
This list should be checked with the Misha's one[2].
we really need the maintainers to act!
Some guides are completly translated but using the wrong language code,
we can't publish nor re-use translations.
I think we need a clear list of which l_code have to be merged in which
one, the thread [2] should helps.
@maintainers, please ask if you need help for that!
[1] https://gitorious.org/tiny-scripts/transifex/trees/master/check_teams
[2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2011-August/013611.html
[3] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2012-March/014116.html
--
Kévin Raymond
(Shaiton)
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 823654] New: Wrong FreeIPA Guide for F16
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823654
Bug ID: 823654
QA Contact: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: devel
Priority: unspecified
CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com,
stickster(a)gmail.com
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Summary: Wrong FreeIPA Guide for F16
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: cevich(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: docs-requests
Product: Fedora Documentation
Description of problem:
Fedora 16 uses FreeIPA 2.1.x, and the FreeIPA.org site correcty points it's doc
link at the 2,1,3 fedora documentation. However, the FreeIPA Guide listed under
Fedora 16 is for version 2.2.x which isn't available, though is slated for
Fedora 17 (I believe).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 16 Documentation
How reproducible:
Very
Steps to Reproduce:
1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
2. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/FreeIPA_Guide/index.html
Actual results:
Fedora 16 users reference documentation for a much newer version of FreeIPA.
Expected results:
Fedora 16 users reference documentation relevant to availabe FreeIPA version.
Additional info:
I don't believe there is much different between FreeIPA 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 which
currently ships, it's probably fine to just keep referencing the 2.1.3 docs for
Fedora 16.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
11 years, 3 months
[Bug 822855] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822855
Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: urgent
Priority: unspecified
Component: virtualization-guide
AssignedTo: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com
QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'.
And then delete the fr_FR one.
fr_FR is not the only duplicated team.
See #816765
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
11 years, 3 months
Efficient Storage of Media Files
by Christopher Antila
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello:
Several weeks ago, somebody wrote to the list about the continually
growing size of the Docs web.git repository. I took a look around, and
confessed that most of the storage is taken up by multiple copies of
the Musicians' Guide. It's time to fix this.
I uploaded the audio files to SoundCloud long ago, but I don't think
we should use them as our primary place to hose this content. For the
"Ardour" chapter, we cannot host the files for licensing reasons...
aside from that, I feel it's better for us to be self-sufficient and
host our own files.
They're actually not that large (less than 100 MiB). The problem is
that Publican copies the audio files every time the Guide is published
in any language. We really only need one copy of the audio files. They
don't change between releases, and they're not translated.
POSSIBLE SOLUTION: Can I make a static directory in the web.git
repository, just for the Musicians' Guide's audio files? Then delete
all the current copies, and replace with a symlink?
I don't want to do first and ask questions later, just in case it
would interfere with Publican... that would be bad news so close to a
release!
Christopher.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPvWMmAAoJEInCktGVqZ8V3GIH/2i9xOezXkOhjTNdbGDEeCHL
XvQMUv1ZZKYuuBxvsT0ym9HxghrFlH6Fw3MiYaabcN8IYiGTHCNYtT5E9QVI27rJ
8KTauLxOuMSa0Git+5Wa/Euoc0YPGIjLJgKfklNKJgGtw5GhCSmQwQFxbyG7QNTX
XPXIb9GG3lxRdE6qloOgPuIsyyZtWDVbYaO0JN4ikaFrmZDUfId3/9z6KEaXix1U
OlkPbwwn0ftyNcF2F7AlkYYNyaEFqRk0wt6n5SrNhAbZt7YPwlyC8+yuZB+3eeoC
BSxL2Y9g7lq4pobrvg82i9Ukj8VuhwY3xGK3jYet700K8aar9WI7C6SnHEEFX9I=
=rRJr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
11 years, 3 months