September 2012 - docs - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 755744] New: typo in PV-Configuring_Additional_Devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Sep '17

01 Sep '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: typo in PV-Configuring_Additional_Devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755744 Summary: typo in PV-Configuring_Additional_Devices Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: virtualization-guide AssignedTo: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shaiton(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org CC: kwade(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- >From the file available in transifex, Now you can configure the new network interfaces using <command>redhat-config-network</command> or Red Hat Enterprise Linux3 or <command>system-config-network</command> on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. that should be "on" Red Hat. I could have corrected that now that I have git access, but this git is still for F14… There were plenty of update about virt since F14, is it outdated? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings#Guides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 693536] New: How to increase the number of configured loop devices
by Red Hat Bugzilla 31 Aug '17

31 Aug '17

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: How to increase the number of configured loop devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693536 Summary: How to increase the number of configured loop devices Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: virtualization-guide AssignedTo: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: apevec(a)redhat.com QAContact: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Description of problem: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/13/html/Virtualization_Guide/sec… Number of loop devices cannot be changed via modprobe.conf since loop is not a kernel module anymore: # grep DEV_LOOP /boot/config-2.6.34.8-68.fc13.x86_64 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

2 7

[Bug 846864] New: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '15

18 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846864 Bug ID: 846864 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: laine(a)redhat.com Summary: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: laine(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Product: Fedora Documentation The Getting Started Guide needs an overview of all the different toolsets, and when each would be appropriate. In particular I'm talking about the following: 1) gnome-boxes 2) virt-manager 3) virsh, virt-install 4) ovirt 5) Should we point some people to OpenStack? I will write up a first draft of this, and hand it to a qualified docs person to edit and correctly place in the guide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 627417] New: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627417 Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note! Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: nathan.thomas(a)peacenik.co.uk QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: We have a large variety of documentation guides serving a wide range of different users. It may be difficult for users arriving at docs.fp.o to know where to start, especially if they are new to Fedora/Linux and are unfamiliar with some of the technical terms. A note on the landing page suggesting a sensible starting point for new users could help alleviate this problem. Eg: "New to Fedora? You can try Fedora on your PC without touching your existing installation by following the Live Image Guide." The end of the Live Image guide helpfully points users to the Installation guide if they want to install :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 654484] New: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Dec '14

15 Dec '14

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654484 Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us ReportedBy: r.landmann(a)redhat.com QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com, nb(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Please create a component for the Storage Administration Guide; default assignee should be ddomingo(a)redhat.com Cheers Rudi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 839625] New: Configuring_an_IPA_Client_on_AIX instructs to configure sshd with 'GSSAPITrustDNS' which causes sshd to no longer start
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Oct '14

15 Oct '14

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839625 Bug ID: 839625 QA Contact: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: devel Priority: medium CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Configuring_an_IPA_Client_on_AIX instructs to configure sshd with 'GSSAPITrustDNS' which causes sshd to no longer start Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: chorn(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/FreeIPA_Guide/Configurin… instructs to set 'GSSAPITrustDNS no' in /etc/ssh/sshd_config . Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current / fedora [15|16|17] instructions How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. access webpage 2. implement change 3. try to start sshd Actual results: sshd no longer starts Expected results: sshd should start Additional info: - GSSAPITrustDNS is a ssh client option - its not mentioned in the manpage but recognized - http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Identity_… mentions it as client option - http://freeipa.com/page/ConfiguringAixClients looks like the most current howto and does not mention the option at all. I think just removing the option from the webpage is the most simple way to resolve this (recheck whole howto with an AIX client for bonus) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 7

#5214: Setup koji tags and repo for Docs
by Fedora Release Engineering 21 Jan '14

21 Jan '14

#5214: Setup koji tags and repo for Docs -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: crantila | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 18 Alpha | Component: koji Keywords: docs | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Posted here as per [https://fedorahosted.org/fedora- infrastructure/ticket/3320] '''phenomenon''' To support simpler and more robust updates to docs.fp.o, need to setup koji to handle a new tag and repo for Docs. '''implementation recommendation''' <Sparks> What would be required to stand up a separate instance of koji for Docs? <dgilmore> Sparks: why would you want a seperate instance? <dgilmore> Sparks: i dont see any valid reason to do so <Sparks> dgilmore: For the Docs website. Publican has the ability publish documentation from packages (separate repo from the Fedora repo) for the website. We want to replace the git repo that operates it now. <dgilmore> Sparks: and why does that need a seperate koji? <Sparks> The git repo has gotten HUGE and is becoming an issue. <dgilmore> Sparks: so, why does that mean a seperate koji instance <dgilmore> Sparks: we could use a seperate tag and targets in koji <dgilmore> i dont see why it would need its own koji <Sparks> dgilmore: It's either that or try to get everyone setup as packagers. <dgilmore> Sparks: get everyone setup as packagers <Sparks> dgilmore: Except that they really won't be packagers. <dgilmore> Sparks: though you dont need to be a a packager to get a koji cert <dgilmore> you just need fas <dgilmore> Sparks: what would be the workflow? <Sparks> dgilmore: Okay, and with that we can send packages through koji and tag them separately? <Sparks> dgilmore: Basically we just tell Publican to build the package and submit it to koji. The Publican software does all the work. <dgilmore> Sparks: I still really dont know what your trying to do. pretend im an idiot(not really that hard) and explain what it is and how it should work <Sparks> dgilmore: I'm not far off... <Sparks> dgilmore: So Publican will make an SRPM package, submit it to koji destined for a repo. Our Publican backend will install those packages and publish the data to the website. <Sparks> ...as I understand it <dgilmore> Sparks: so we would need to set up seperate tags and tagets for it, defining a koji policy allowing srpms to be built. likely we would add a new group to koji and add people allowed to build docs to it and limit access to the tags/targets to people in that group <dgilmore> Sparks: so its all doable <Sparks> dgilmore: Well that's a lot easier. :) <Sparks> dgilmore: We already have a group in FAS for people that should have access (docs- publishers). Should I open a ticket? <dgilmore> Sparks: koji doesnt know anything about fas <dgilmore> Sparks: please file a ticket. We wont be able to make changes until after f17 is done <Sparks> dgilmore: That's fine. We're not completely ready for the transition so after F17 would be good. <Sparks> dgilmore: Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5214> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 15

[Bug 833223] New: Adding lang_map to docsite-publican
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833223 Bug ID: 833223 QA Contact: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Adding lang_map to docsite-publican Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Product: Fedora Documentation docsite-publican still not use the config_map syntax in .tx/config file. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Setting_up_a_document_with_Transifex#Step_5:_… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 450331] New: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID problem)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Apr '13

03 Apr '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450331 Summary: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID problem) Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: docs-requests AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: czar(a)acm.org QAContact: stickster(a)gmail.com CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449299 There is a lack of documentation on restoring a system from bare metal. I have found (see reference) that restore the root ("/") is not as simple as as just executing the restore command when running in rescue mode. With the current emphasis being place on use of UUIDs in both Fedora and RHEL, the whole business of UUIDs need to be better documented. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 14

Task for new contributor: Documenting how to modify iptables rules for the wiki
by pedro coelho 05 Oct '12

05 Oct '12

Good morning, I'm a new newcomer in the documentation project and I would like to give a try on writing this tutorial Best regards, Pedro

2 2

Reminder: Guides due to be branched on 2 October
by Ben Cotton 27 Sep '12

27 Sep '12

Guide owners, Just a friendly reminder that guides are scheduled to be branched and POT files generated on 2 October. The full schedule is at: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tree-tasks.html -- Ben Cotton Fedora Docs Leader

2 3

Docs meeting summary -- 24 September 2012
by Ben Cotton 24 Sep '12

24 Sep '12

Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (bcotton, 13:59:15) * Follow up on last week's action items (bcotton, 14:04:14) * ACTION: Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures (bcotton, 14:04:53) * Fedora 18 schedule (bcotton, 14:05:59) * LINK: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html (bcotton, 14:06:04) * Guides scheduled to be branched 2 October (bcotton, 14:06:09) * POT files for guides due 2 October (bcotton, 14:06:15) * LINK: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Doc… (bcotton, 14:08:22) * LINK: : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Branching_a_document_in_git (bcotton, 14:09:23) * the Tx info in the documentation guide is outdated (bcotton, 14:09:38) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Setting_up_a_document_with_Transifex (bcotton, 14:09:45) * ACTION: bcotton to update Documentation Guide with correct Transifex info (bcotton, 14:09:58) * Release Notes (bcotton, 14:13:15) * wiki beats due 26 September (bcotton, 14:13:32) * wiki freeze 2 Octobe (bcotton, 14:13:41) * There is a danger in losing data when dual booting Windows 8 and Linux (Sparks, 14:14:38) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859373 (Sparks, 14:14:47) * AGREED: biosdevname will be re-included in the F18 release notes (bcotton, 14:46:11) * Outstanding BZ tickets (bcotton, 14:47:43) * LINK: http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 (bcotton, 14:47:53) * Open Floor Discussion (bcotton, 14:49:24) Meeting ended at 14:52:29 UTC. Action Items ------------ * Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures * bcotton to update Documentation Guide with correct Transifex info Action Items, by person ----------------------- * bcotton * bcotton to update Documentation Guide with correct Transifex info * Sparks * Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * bcotton (63) * Sparks (26) * Southern_Gentlem (19) * Capesteve (12) * jjmcd (9) * zodbot (5) * pkovar (5) * lnovich (2) * shaiton_ (1) Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-24/fedora_docs.2012… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-24/fedora_docs.2012… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-24/fedora_docs.2012… -- Ben Cotton Fedora Docs Leader

1 0

Fedora Docs Meeting Reminder
by Ben Cotton 23 Sep '12

23 Sep '12

This is an automated message to remind you that we will be meeting at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Unless we've previously agreed that we will not be meeting today.

1 0

[Bug 857405] New: Readme Live Image isn't branched for F17
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Sep '12

20 Sep '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857405 Bug ID: 857405 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: kwade(a)redhat.com, nathan(a)afternoondust.co.uk, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Summary: Readme Live Image isn't branched for F17 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: shnurapet(a)fedoraproject.org Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: readme-live-image Product: Fedora Documentation The guide isn't maintained, it needs to be branched for Fedora 17. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 3

Re: F18 Release Notes
by Ales Kozumplik 19 Sep '12

19 Sep '12

Hello, this is in reaction to Pete's mail on fedora-announce-list. I am working on an experimental fork of yum: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF The package is available in F18 and I'd like it to be mentioned in the release notes. Many thanks, Ales Kozumplik On 09/18/2012 02:24 AM, Pete Travis wrote: > Greetings! > > As the Fedora Documentation Project prepares the release notes for > Fedora 18, we'd like to ask for your help. Each Fedora release marks > the inclusion of new features and the retirement of others, and with > the help of the development community, we won't skip a beat. The Docs > team would like you to assign us some homework. > > The release notes are divided up into categories, or 'beats.' Each > beat is kept by a volunteer who follows mailing lists, changelogs, > announcements, and features in the space. Many beats also have a > developer point of contact for technical questions and cooperation. We > track these responsibilities with > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats , which > includes links out to wiki pages for each individual beat. As we > reach the end of the release cycle, developers and docs maintainers > populate these pages, then they are converted from wiki markup to > Docbook XML and published. With a little help, we can put out release > notes that can't be beat. > > If you're working on something for Fedora, we'd like to make sure > you get the credit you deserve. Leave us a quick note on a beats page, > send it to our mailing list ( > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs ), or join us in > #fedora-docs. You don't need to worry about language and composition > or even spelling - just let us know what you've been working on that > you'd like documented and we'll take it from there. > > We *really* don't want you to beat yourself up about presentation. > A simple "make sure you mention this new feature" is enough. We're > happy to do the research and compose the prose. Knowing where to start > writing makes the process considerably more efficient, just as a brief > note on hundreds of features from each developer is more effective > than a handful of docs maintainers trying to follow all of hundreds of > features. > > Thanks for helping us represent your work to the users, > > Pete Travis, > The Fedora Docs Team > _______________________________________________ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce

3 4

Docs meeting summary -- 17 September 2012
by Ben Cotton 17 Sep '12

17 Sep '12

Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (bcotton, 14:00:45) * Follow up on last week's action items (bcotton, 14:04:38) * ACTION: Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures (bcotton, 14:06:10) * Fedora 18 schedule (bcotton, 14:06:31) * LINK: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html (bcotton, 14:06:42) * LINK: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html (bcotton, 14:06:47) * Guides scheduled to be branched 2 October (bcotton, 14:06:59) * Alpha declared gold, will be released tomorrow (bcotton, 14:07:13) * Release Notes (bcotton, 14:09:05) * Alpha RN (one page) due 17 September (bcotton, 14:09:13) * wiki beats due 26 September (bcotton, 14:09:22) * ACTION: bcotton to write Alpha RN (bcotton, 14:10:51) * LINK: https://gist.github.com/3734372 (randomuser, 14:14:34) * HELP: randomuser would like feedback on https://gist.github.com/3734372 before sending to devs (bcotton, 14:16:02) * Outstanding BZ Tickets (bcotton, 14:19:22) * LINK: http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 (bcotton, 14:19:34) * Open Floor Discussion (bcotton, 14:25:19) Meeting ended at 14:27:36 UTC. Action Items ------------ * Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures * bcotton to write Alpha RN Action Items, by person ----------------------- * bcotton * bcotton to write Alpha RN * Sparks * Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * bcotton (49) * shaiton_ (8) * claneys (7) * randomuser (5) * jjmcd (5) * Sparks (4) * zodbot (4) * pkovar (1) * sgordon (1) * Capesteve (1) Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-17/fedora_docs.2012… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-17/fedora_docs.2012… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-17/fedora_docs.2012… -- Ben Cotton Fedora Docs Leader

1 0

Fedora Docs Meeting Reminder
by Ben Cotton 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

This is an automated message to remind you that we will be meeting at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Unless we've previously agreed that we will not be meeting today.

1 0

[Bug 853826] New: Section 3.1 - suggest adding "Less Down Time" verbiage
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Sep '12

16 Sep '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853826 Bug ID: 853826 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: low Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Summary: Section 3.1 - suggest adding "Less Down Time" verbiage Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: joat(a)757.org Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: virtualization-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Description of problem: In Section 3.1, of the Draft Virtualization Guide for Fedora 18, suggest adding something similar to the following: "Less Down Time VMs can be copied or moved, configuration changes can be validated, and software updates can be tested without impacting the users' online experience." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 18 How reproducible: Not a fault. Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: N/A Expected results: N/A Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 856116] New: Please create the cloud guide component (+typo)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=856116 Bug ID: 856116 QA Contact: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, stickster(a)gmail.com Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Summary: Please create the cloud guide component (+typo) Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: kraymond(a)shaiton.org Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Product: Fedora Documentation Hi there, I wanted to report a typo but could not find the cloud guide component. Could you create it please? Also, here is the typo: "argee" instead of "agree". See https://fedora.transifex.com/projects/p/fedora-cloud-guide/resource/AmazonE… Thanks to eko ikhyar to have reported this on the l10n mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

Fedora Docs Meeting Reminder
by Ben Cotton 09 Sep '12

09 Sep '12

This is an automated message to remind you that we will be meeting at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Unless we've previously agreed that we will not be meeting today.

1 0

Suggestion for writing release notes
by Couret Charles-Antoine 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Hi all, My name is Fedora and I am a French ambassador. Since Fedora 16, I write the announce in French for the new Fedora release. The French team, who translate Fedora, found the release notes written enough, too short and not suitable for public. It's difficult to translate and understand these documents. It is more a concatenation of all provided strings without so much flourish. I think, the releases notes require to many skills in "data processing" to understand the news in Fedora. For me, it's the official document to communicate the changelog with the public and actually, it's not possible with that. With the French team, we thought to write the release notes in French and translate that in English for others translation team. If you are ok to this project, I can write the document before the 17th September, it's sufficient for others translation in future. That could be a Publican replacement for the usual Release Notes. I don't master yet Publican but I am willing to learn. In short, the idea is to provide the Release Notes for Fedora 18 in a detail document avoiding the usual phrasing like bellow: " Desktop - GNOME has been updated to the latest release XX; - KDE has been updated to the latest release YY; - Mate has been packaged for the first time in Fedora.." The original document would be written in French but translated in English throught Transifex. Of course, we would need English people to proofread and improve our translation. You can read my precedent work for that (Fedora 16 and 17) : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Renault/Promotion/Fedora_17 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Renault/Promotion/Fedora_16 It is more detailed, explained and written.Briefly, for a wide dissemination. Thank you for giving me your opinion on the subject. Charles-Antoine Couret — Renault

5 6

Re: Fedora Security Guide Update
by Eric Christensen 04 Sep '12

04 Sep '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/29/2012 05:28 PM, Adam D. Ligas wrote: > Hey Eric! > > I wrote a very tiny section of the security guide - the bit on > 7-Zip - and I was looking to revisit it to make a couple updates > since there has been some change in this space for F17+. Yes, I noticed that you had made some changes to the wiki page. Unfortunately is not current with what's in the Security Guide since development has moved over to the XML files in git. I can make the changes you've pointed out or you can do so, yourself, in git. > The second update I want to make is to the navigation paths to > Terminal. They need to be updated from: > > Applications -> System Tools -> Terminal to Activities -> > Applications -> Terminal Yeah, this would only be in GNOME 3 and I wonder what other changes need to be made else where. I'm not sure how to really deal with the difference between GNOME 3 and other desktop environments. > The third update I wanted to do was add a new section for creating > the archives via the GUI. This wasn't possible before, and I > imagine it will be a lot easier for some folks. That one is > longer, so I attached it to this email. Got it. As I said above I can add it myself or you are welcome to do so. > The last update I wanted to make was to update my credit. Given > how much I've contributed it is almost silly that I'm credited at > all, but it is certainly appreciated. If my email address could be > changed to agent86(a)fedoraproject.org, that would be awesome. Then > I'll look like everyone else, and it'll be easier for when my email > moves in the future. No contribution is too small (or too big!). I'll update your email address in the author list. > I'm not sure if it is a major no-no or not, but I also updated the > wiki (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Archive:Security_Guide/7Zip) > It looks like things have migrated into a new Fedora Documentation > system I am unfamiliar with, but if nothing else, I thought the > edits in the wiki might be easier for you to pull than the one > attached. Yeah, those wiki pages are dead and need to be removed (they are already in Archive:). All SG development is in git. > > - Adam > Thanks for your updates! I've cc'd the Docs list so we have a public record of the conversation and your contribution. Just let me know if you would like to make those changes in git or not. If you need some assistance just let me or someone else know and we can help you out there. - -Eric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQRfsTAAoJEIB2q94CS7PRkBkQALwTvqj2PqfZniqfE8FwNieQ GXmPJO1SgoZzpbz13EAXql+cHxTmOSHhBYRmQjAWWV8y1kNncgRy7ln2YbIQmvSB YnXG7BTe+gCznZyfL7qMaQUFMNWeOBEn39g27g49aR9cwz7JdaJSv/bqr1M0v5uU SQnMa9OdgUbLHee/ZSS74mfedzu61SCAoB8SSdHr64dF8/IhJY+oDFE7kZ2EEKWX Urzf12sNliVAh3ogl04pMH6hLqm1j2z4VT/hx7DAEughRUOIGlnnlvAXrN00MFWa ZgpWqeeETCO0RlDb75fL3LfMcROr/zUKMZ6EGuzKbNM0N69Kh++FhQnUfkhZugQs czxPNXmZxvZwQr8dukl+n8bSwlLVSZKOPi0ffuurwqVF09zoWOxiqB4QzN3qe4mi Qr341nQDOwQ7gT4icKcs+ffqvsSDke+lt0/kfgK500J2ojEmtO+LqtHRvgTyP6v+ TEcBc0Q3z2BAMH/4Ich1iSude7dqPtPId+OcG9kLEWDMGZKCzCsTsptzL3Ry4Tp6 S6e72GTVfv8q/6g2UAxj2oTzkBz39+fnSbvMQO0NV2pU69Aidh7me5uDVdUKbJQo +AgqBtm7GNVgGBUNb56e/JPDEGmZEhoJgJqVO8Wx9WVjz7QHLzJiewOEl4/sw+vJ 3QC5IBLoEW1G71vq7J64 =JT8W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Docs meeting summary - 3 September 2012
by Ben Cotton 03 Sep '12

03 Sep '12

==================================================================================================== #fedora-meeting: Docs Project Meeting - Agenda: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs_Project_meetings ==================================================================================================== Meeting started by bcotton at 14:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-03/fedora_docs.2012… Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (bcotton, 14:00:27) * Follow up on last week's action items (bcotton, 14:05:15) * ACTION: Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures (bcotton, 14:05:30) * Release Notes (bcotton, 14:05:39) * Alpha RN (one page) due 11 September (bcotton, 14:06:04) * wiki beats due 19 September (bcotton, 14:06:22) * HELP: There are still open beats that need to be written (bcotton, 14:07:07) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats (bcotton, 14:07:23) * Fedora 18 schedule (bcotton, 14:08:44) * LINK: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-18/f-18-docs-tasks.html (bcotton, 14:08:55) * Alpha release date has slipped by a week again. (bcotton, 14:09:14) * Guides scheduled to be branched 25 September (bcotton, 14:09:45) * Outstanding BZ Tickets (bcotton, 14:11:59) * LINK: http://tinyurl.com/lbrq84 (bcotton, 14:12:08) * Open floor discussion (bcotton, 14:12:21) Meeting ended at 14:14:11 UTC. Action Items ------------ * Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * Sparks to add relevant git commands to QA procedures People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * bcotton (29) * zodbot (3) * jhradilek (1) * pkovar (1) * jreznik (1) * Capesteve (1) Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-03/fedora_docs.2012… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-03/fedora_docs.2012… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-09-03/fedora_docs.2012… -- Ben Cotton Fedora Docs Leader

2 1

Fedora Docs Meeting Reminder
by Ben Cotton 02 Sep '12

02 Sep '12

This is an automated message to remind you that we will be meeting at 1400 UTC in #fedora-meeting. Unless we've previously agreed that we will not be meeting today.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

docs September 2012