On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 08:29:58PM +1000, Murray McAllister wrote:
> I'm actually surprised at Christopher's assessment of
> Is it disingenuous? He works in Red Hat's Content Services group, I
> assumed he was aware of the ongoing work from that group to fully open
> content that has been only on redhat.com
> I haven't added up the number of pages, but it's more than nothing.
> Consider that all but the first items from Red Hat were developed
> entirely in the community.
Sorry to complain :-) "https://fedorahosted.org/selinuxguide/" was
developed entirely in the community. See the archives:
The SELinux User Guide is not on
I might have missed what you were saying, and the community reference
above may be referring to fedora documentation or fedora specific
mailing lists only. Also, "selinuxguide" may have been referring to
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4?
Thanks for the correction, I forgot the source of that content. The
overall point remains the same, that there are more highly active
content areas/guides than just a few.
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener