-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
>gaurav wrote:
>
>>I hope people might find it useful as its general perception
that
>>Oracle runs only certified RH products like RHEL,RAS etc
>
>
>I think perhaps you would like to add caveat to the statement made
>above. Oracle *supports* installations on certified Operating
System stack.
>
>In an ideal world, Oracle is dependant upon kernel and glibc
version.
>www.puschitz.com is one site where RHEL as well as FC
installations are
>covered.
not exactly ,www.puschitz.com does not cover Oracle 9i installation
fc3 , fc4 and other derived products , he recently updated RHAS 4
tutorial
general perception example
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/msg10882.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/msg10883.html
>
>>initially i had submitted this article on Redhat doc list but
I really
>>got tired with my bad experience with RH bureaucratic process
and
>>double standards (stuff like fedora is not supposed to Run in
>>enterprise and setup , use RHEL , we don t document
proprietary stuff
>>for fedora but its ok for RHEL Blah blah) .
>
>
>Can you point to some public mailing list thread on this ?
>
read this thread
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2005-April/msg00242.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2005-April/msg00243.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2005-April/msg00249.html
>Regards
>Sankarshan
>
>
>
- --
"Innovation is not absolutely necessary, but then neither is
survival."
- -- Andrew Papageorge
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCxWSVAO9KHA2KWcRAozsAJsEh7+C25H8jTm9++lTp5WEG3u7rgCfW8Dd
VIuB53Lxi1HrExRHzrLs2Zk=
=Q0/A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----