On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 06:02 -0500, Thomas Jones wrote:
On Friday 29 July 2005 16:23, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Isn't the color system and/or browser *dependent*? In other words, the
> links are colored exactly the way any generic link is colored for the
> end user, meaning they don't see anything they don't recognize.
> However, I'm not against changing them, as long as we (a) agree on what
> sticks out without sticking out TOO much, and (b) it is nicely
> Fedora-like.
Oops...you are right. ;) The "generic" link is inherently capable of being
different on every node. Which brings to light the issue of fedora-like
representation to the end-user.
I like what yourself and Karsten have done with the new scheme. I personally
would think that some colors that promote a fedora-like visual appearance
would be great. The accepted standard of blue/purple are a safe bet. But then
again another selection from you/Karsten may provide more cohesion with the
new scheme.
I made another change to the heading color and link colors, this time to
be more adherent to the official web site. I think you'll like the
results! Please check the mockup at:
http://docs.frields.org/mirror-tutorial-en/sn-planning-and-setup.html
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/