<quote who="Tim Waugh">
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:32:34PM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> I'm poking Tim for some input.
The xmltex and passivetex applications are no longer supported
upstream. I think the new way is to use some sort of ConTeXt-based
parser, but don't know the details.
> I don't fully understand the issues. IIRC, we were discussing using fop
> instead of the tex backend for pdf generation. Is one of our barriers
> that there is no fop package for Fedora? And we want it compiled with
> gcj?
If we had a fop package for Fedora, and someone was willing to make
the necessary adjustments to xmlto, I feel sure that things would be
bound to improve.
When do we start?
Tim.
*/
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list