On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 06:07, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 21:34, Karsten Wade wrote:
- We don't want outside repositories or hosted draft documents to be
seen _at_all_ as official, supported, backed-up, unrootkitted, or anything sources for FDP docs or SCM (software configuration
^^^^^ other than? (not nitpicking, just making sure Iunderstand.)
management).
Bad idiomatic usage ... it should parse like, "we don't want outside repositories to be seen at all as official anything to do with FDP."
Still awkward. How about:
* Because of concerns over support, availability, redundancy, and security, we don't want non-FDP doc or source repositories to be seen as "officially" connected to the project. For example, if someone's SCM gets compromised and a rootkit trojan is loaded into document tarball ... well, bad things could happen.
Hope that is clearer,
- Karsten