That won't drive me away. As I said, I'm trying to figure out the lay of the land here. Now I take it there is some documentation that is considered Fedora documentation while other documentation is from other organizations. I guess I presumed if it was accessible from "fedora" via yum, it was considered Fedora documentation.

Thanks for the insight.

Chris

Sulyok Peti wrote:

2008. 06. 18, szerda keltezéssel 22.38-kor Chris Carlson ezt írta:

Given this background, I thought I could be of some use to the Fedora 
documentation project.  I'm not sure how much time I'll have, but I want 
to help.  I've already found a minor typo in the documentation for 
glXIntro.  The example program sets an attribute to GLX_DOUBLE_BUFFER, 
but the symbol doesn't exist; it's now called GLX_DOUBLEBUFFER.


I do not want to drive you away, but this problem is not a Fedora Docs
issue. If you type

$ rpm -qif /usr/share/man/man3/glXIntro.3gl.gz
Name        : mesa-libGL-devel             Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version     : 7.1                               Vendor: Fedora Project
Release     : 0.31.fc9                      Build Date: 2008. máj. 10.,
szombat, 07.43.18 CEST
Install Date: 2008. máj. 30., péntek, 18.39.24 CEST      Build Host:
xenbuilder2.fedora.redhat.com
Group       : Development/Libraries         Source RPM:
mesa-7.1-0.31.fc9.src.rpm
Size        : 938090                           License: MIT
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, 2008. máj. 28., szerda, 13.32.44 CEST, Key ID
b44269d04f2a6fd2
Packager    : Fedora Project
URL         : http://www.mesa3d.org
Summary     : Mesa libGL development package
<<<<<<<<<<

So this doc belongs to http://www.mesa3d.org