On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 16:48 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Hello, All!
Currently, the RPM packaging is geared to produce two types of RPM:
1) A .src.rpm whose content is somewhat similar to a CVS checkout; and
2) A .noarch.rpm whose content is targeted to the GNOME/KDE help
infrastructure.
Should we also include the rendered HTML files in the .noarch.rpm or
should we have an additional version?
What's the use case for additional rendered HTML files?
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/