On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:58 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
Currently we are all over the place. Here are some variations:
docs/release-notes/fc4/ru/
docs/selinux-faq-fc3/
docs/fedora-install-guide-en/
I tend to like directories to sort things, but that could get crazy.
Does this have a natural stopping point (bottom level) that is sane
enough? This is as deep as we need, I think:
docs/fc4/selinux-faq/en/
What I see Paul is suggesting:
docs/fc4/selinux-faq-en/
Timothy Murphy said:
> I would have put the OS split (fc2, fc3, etc) before the subject
> split, since most people will only be interested in documentation
> for a given distribution.
That's a good point worth considering.
Are people looking for documents:
a) First by version, then by subject?
b) First by subject, then by version?
I'm not sure what I _think_ is true. Personally, I tend to look by
subject, then by version. There is often not what I need in my
particular version, so I am looking for 'close enough.'
Reiterating what Elliot said, I'm not sure it matters much; I'm only
concerned about what makes sense for our publishing routine, and what
will be of the greatest value for later automation (to whatever extent
is possible). Sorry I didn't give a better example when I did the OP,
but the idea of "docs/some-tutorial-en/fc4/" seems best to me, since it
might enable more of the build to be pasted over from Docs CVS en masse.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/