On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 19:34 -0600, Clint Savage wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 17:26 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Was the DUG supposed to be targeted at F-8 or F-9? I ask
> user-facing software situation for the network changes
> F-9 with NetworkManager by default.
Whoops. We are definitely across each other right now. Half
of us are
working on F-8 and half on F-9 content.
1. Freeze work on the DUG for a few days
2. Branch what is there into an F-8 and F-9 version
Use the new structure?
3. Dig out the changes that make it F-9 and put those in one
4. Look in the history for the changes that make it F-8 and
put those in
the other version
The point is, we had 90% of the work for an F-8 guide
completed, why not
version it and help it get done. Coincidentally, we have 70%
work for F-9 done, same deal.
Sounds good to me.
+1 from me I won't be able to do it for a week. Since come Sunday I'm gone for a
week on a training course for my job.