Now where did I put those release notes?

[Jason]

Release time is nearly here again...Guess what that means? New release
notes!! But alas, we are currently faced with a couple of issues.

1. Beat Relevancy. Are there any topics/beats that we no longer need to
cover? Current Beats[1]

2. Missing Beats. Are there topics/beats we should be covering?

Also, as an FYI, we are planning on compiling an orphaned beats list and
then find owners for their content. The folks over at the
fedora-devel-list will likely be contacted first. If you see a beat you
are interested in that doesn't list an owner[2] let us know by replying
to this email or dropping by in #fedora-docs.

For those that have beats assigned to them[2] please take this time to
make sure the content is up-to-date. If questions arise feel free to
corner someone and ask. Wordsmiths will comb the beats in the near
future to do their thing, at this point we are looking for the technical
content. (If you wordsmith it too quaid promised random gifts! j/k)

[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats

[2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Beats#Beat_Assi...

Thanks everyone for the effort and work so far, it has been an
interesting release to say the least...

-Jason

[Nigel Jones]

On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 23:17 -0400, Jason wrote:
>  Release time is nearly here again...Guess what that means? New
> release
>  notes!! But alas, we are currently faced with a couple of issues.
>  
>  1. Beat Relevancy. Are there any topics/beats that we no longer need to
>  cover? Current Beats[1]
>  
>  2. Missing Beats. Are there topics/beats we should be covering? 
Please, for the
sake of my (in)sanity include something about the new
boot process, especially for people with multiboot systems.

It's changed so much, I think we have to make it, it's own beat.
>  
>  Also, as an FYI, we are planning on compiling an orphaned beats list and
>  then find owners for their content. The folks over at the
>  fedora-devel-list will likely be contacted first. If you see a beat you
>  are interested in that doesn't list an owner[2] let us know by replying
>  to this email or dropping by in #fedora-docs.
>  
>  For those that have beats assigned to them[2] please take this time to
>  make sure the content is up-to-date. If questions arise feel free to
>  corner someone and ask. Wordsmiths will comb the beats in the near
>  future to do their thing, at this point we are looking for the technical
>  content. (If you wordsmith it too quaid promised random gifts! j/k)
>  
>  [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats
>  
>  [2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/ReleaseNotes/Beats#Beat_Assi...
>  
>  Thanks everyone for the effort and work so far, it has been an
>  interesting release to say the least...
>  
>  -Jason
>  -- 
>  fedora-docs-list mailing list
>  fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe: 
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list 
-- 
Nigel Jones <dev(a)nigelj.com&gt;

[Jason Farrell]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Nigel Jones <dev(a)nigelj.com&gt; wrote:

>  Please, for the sake of my (in)sanity include something about the
> new
>  boot process, especially for people with multiboot systems.
>
>  It's changed so much, I think we have to make it, it's own beat.
>  
What's changed so much about the f10 boot process with respect to grub
multibooting? As far as I can see, grub's still grub, just quieter --
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBetterStartup

The grub.conf 'hiddenmenu' would still be default, and pressing escape still
necessary (but no countdown timer)?