Fwd: BZ Component and Product Change Request

[Douglas Silas]

I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a
ticket for this request:

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667

Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide" 
component under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There 
seems to be some confusion about this.

Thanks,

-- 
Douglas Silas
Technical Writer | Red Hat, Inc.

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On 09/10/2009 01:40 PM, Douglas Silas wrote:
>  I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a
>  ticket for this request:
>  
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667
>  
>  Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide" component
>  under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There seems to be
> some
>  confusion about this.
>   
Infrastructure is mostly unclear as to what the Fedora Documentation
Project is intending here.

* Is this rename something that Fedora Documentation would like to do
across the Board?

* Does Fedora Documentation want individual Guide maintainers to have
the option to rename but not want to rename all Guides?

* If it is indeed to be moved from the "Fedora Documentation" product to
the "Fedora" product, why is that?  Normally, "Fedora" is for
packages
in the distro and there's no package for the deployment guide (at least,
not yet).

* If shifting bugzilla products, does that need to be coordinated with
the Packaging side of the project by talking to FESCo?

And lots of other questions like this :-)  Fedora Infrastructure can
make changes, but we'd be making changes to things owned by docs and
fesco so we want to make sure that the relevant owners are on-board with
the changes.

-Toshio

[Eric Christensen]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:20, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On 09/10/2009 01:40 PM, Douglas Silas wrote:
> > I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a
> > ticket for this request:
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667
> >
> > Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide" component
> > under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There seems to be
> some
> > confusion about this.
> >
>  Infrastructure is mostly unclear as to what the Fedora Documentation
>  Project is intending here.
>
>  * Is this rename something that Fedora Documentation would like to do
>  across the Board? 
No.

>  * Does Fedora Documentation want individual Guide maintainers to have
>  the option to rename but not want to rename all Guides? 
I think this should probably be brought before the group.

>  * If it is indeed to be moved from the "Fedora Documentation" product to
>  the "Fedora" product, why is that?  Normally, "Fedora" is for
> packages
>  in the distro and there's no package for the deployment guide (at least,
>  not yet).
>
>  * If shifting bugzilla products, does that need to be coordinated with
>  the Packaging side of the project by talking to FESCo?
>
>  And lots of other questions like this :-)  Fedora Infrastructure can
>  make changes, but we'd be making changes to things owned by docs and
>  fesco so we want to make sure that the relevant owners are on-board with
>  the changes.
>
>  -Toshio
>  
Eric

[Eric Christensen]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 18:06, Eric Christensen
<eric(a)christensenplace.us&gt; wrote:
>  On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:20, Toshio Kuratomi
> <a.badger(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> > On 09/10/2009 01:40 PM, Douglas Silas wrote:
> >> I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a
> >> ticket for this request:
> >>
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667
> >>
> >> Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide"
> component
> >> under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There seems
> to be some
> >> confusion about this.
> >>
> > Infrastructure is mostly unclear as to what the Fedora Documentation
> > Project is intending here.
> >
> > * Is this rename something that Fedora Documentation would like to do
> > across the Board?
>
>  No.
>
> >
> > * Does Fedora Documentation want individual Guide maintainers to have
> > the option to rename but not want to rename all Guides?
>
>  I think this should probably be brought before the group.
>
> >
> > * If it is indeed to be moved from the "Fedora Documentation" product to
> > the "Fedora" product, why is that?  Normally, "Fedora" is for
> packages
> > in the distro and there's no package for the deployment guide (at least,
> > not yet).
> >
> > * If shifting bugzilla products, does that need to be coordinated with
> > the Packaging side of the project by talking to FESCo?
> >
> > And lots of other questions like this :-)  Fedora Infrastructure can
> > make changes, but we'd be making changes to things owned by docs and
> > fesco so we want to make sure that the relevant owners are on-board with
> > the changes.
> >
> > -Toshio
> >
>
>  Eric
>  
Sorry for being short...  I'm not feeling well today.

--Eric

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 07:55:59PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote:
>  On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 18:06, Eric Christensen
>  <eric(a)christensenplace.us&gt; wrote:
>  > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 17:20, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  >> On 09/10/2009 01:40 PM, Douglas Silas wrote:
>  >>> I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a
>  >>> ticket for this request:
>  >>>
>  >>> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667
>  >>>
>  >>> Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide"
> component
>  >>> under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There
> seems to be some
>  >>> confusion about this.
>  >>>
>  >> Infrastructure is mostly unclear as to what the Fedora Documentation
>  >> Project is intending here.
>  >>
>  >> * Is this rename something that Fedora Documentation would like to do
>  >> across the Board?
>  >
>  > No.
>  >
>  >>
>  >> * Does Fedora Documentation want individual Guide maintainers to have
>  >> the option to rename but not want to rename all Guides?
>  >
>  > I think this should probably be brought before the group.
>  >
>  >>
>  >> * If it is indeed to be moved from the "Fedora Documentation" product
> to
>  >> the "Fedora" product, why is that?  Normally, "Fedora" is
> for packages
>  >> in the distro and there's no package for the deployment guide (at least,
>  >> not yet).
>  >>
>  >> * If shifting bugzilla products, does that need to be coordinated with
>  >> the Packaging side of the project by talking to FESCo?
>  >>
>  >> And lots of other questions like this :-)  Fedora Infrastructure can
>  >> make changes, but we'd be making changes to things owned by docs and
>  >> fesco so we want to make sure that the relevant owners are on-board with
>  >> the changes.
>  >>
>  >> -Toshio
>  >>
>  >
>  > Eric
>  >
>  
>  Sorry for being short...  I'm not feeling well today. 
I doubt anyone thought you were short -- you're always so easy going!
Hope you feel better soon!

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

BZ Component and Product Change Request

[Eric Christensen]

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 16:40, Douglas Silas <dhensley(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  I have a pending request that I need to accomplish soon. There is a
>  ticket for this request:
>
>  https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1667
>
>  Mike, just to clarify: did you want the "doc-Deployment_Guide" component
>  under "Fedora" or under "Fedora Documentation"? There seems to be
> some
>  confusion about this.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  --
>  Douglas Silas
>  Technical Writer | Red Hat, Inc.
>  
Has this been resolved, now?  Is "Deployment_Guide" good now?

--Eric