Re: a home for comps @books group

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

----- "Christopher Curran"  wrote:
> > a) add @books to the Development category,
> > (fits the 3 current opensource devel books there)
> There is no point breaking string 
> freeze if the books are already deprecated.

I don't think any are deprecated.

For reference the current books are:

- diveintopython
- javanotes
- ldd-pdf (linux device drivers)

so yeah developer-oriented.
I went ahead and put @books into the Development category for F12.

I am still wondering about a "Content" category for F13.
Should we go with that even it only were to contain @books
for now?  Anyway probably more important would be getting
gnome-packagekit to list books when we have more.

Jens

a home for comps @books group

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:13:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
> I am still wondering about a "Content" category for F13.
> Should we go with that even it only were to contain @books
> for now?  Anyway probably more important would be getting
> gnome-packagekit to list books when we have more.

I like that; there could be lots of content that fits,
e.g. screencasts.  Better to be a bit wider in our solution.

- Karsten

a home for comps @books group

[Chris Curran]

Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 02:13:11AM -0400, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > I am still wondering about a "Content" category for F13.
> > Should we go with that even it only were to contain @books
> > for now?  Anyway probably more important would be getting
> > gnome-packagekit to list books when we have more.
>
> I like that; there could be lots of content that fits,
> e.g. screencasts.  Better to be a bit wider in our solution.
> Karsten

I think, even considering, delivering screencasts by RPM or yum is 
completely the wrong approach. Documentation has a space on the desktop, 
videos do not.