OPL relicensing

[Paul W. Frields]

Hi FDPers,

I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:

Manuel Ospina
José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
Francesco Tombolini
Hugo Cisneiros
Andrew Martynov

Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
for the bother.

[Rahul Sundaram]

On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 10:33 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Hi FDPers,
>
> I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
> licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:
>
> Manuel Ospina
> José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
> Francesco Tombolini
> Hugo Cisneiros
> Andrew Martynov
>
> Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
> give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
> for the bother.

The CLA allows relicensing without asking each and every contributor
explicit permission. It can be done as a matter of courtesy but its not
a legal requirement.

Rahul

[Paul W. Frields]

On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 20:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 10:33 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Hi FDPers,
> >
> > I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
> > licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:
> >
> > Manuel Ospina
> > José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
> > Francesco Tombolini
> > Hugo Cisneiros
> > Andrew Martynov
> >
> > Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
> > give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
> > for the bother.
>
> The CLA allows relicensing without asking each and every contributor
> explicit permission. It can be done as a matter of courtesy but its not
> a legal requirement.

Ah, you're right Rahul.  Thanks for reminding me.  I always like to be
super-careful about not stepping on legal toes.

[Andrew Martynov]

Hello, Paul!

I would like to confirm absesence of any condition
from my side to relicensing this document.

I uploaded OPL licence Russian translation today.

Regards,
Andrew Martynov
Inventa

On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 10:43:27AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 20:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 10:33 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > Hi FDPers,
> > >
> > > I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
> > > licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:
> > >
> > > Manuel Ospina
> > > José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
> > > Francesco Tombolini
> > > Hugo Cisneiros
> > > Andrew Martynov
> > >
> > > Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
> > > give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
> > > for the bother.
> >
> > The CLA allows relicensing without asking each and every contributor
> > explicit permission. It can be done as a matter of courtesy but its not
> > a legal requirement.
>
> Ah, you're right Rahul.  Thanks for reminding me.  I always like to be
> super-careful about not stepping on legal toes.
>
> -- 
> Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
>   gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
>  Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
> -- 
> fedora-docs-list mailing list
> [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe: 
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 12:03 +0400, Andrew Martynov wrote:
> I would like to confirm absesence of any condition
> from my side to relicensing this document.
>
> I uploaded OPL licence Russian translation today.

Thank you everyone for your time!  I will work on getting this document
republished.  There may be minor corrections here and there if I find
some things in the en_US version that need to be fixed.

[Manuel Ospina]

El dom, 28-05-2006 a las 20:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram escribió:
> On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 10:33 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > Hi FDPers,
> >
> > I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
> > licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:
> >
> > Manuel Ospina

How can I give permission to relicense the document? If it is only to
give my approval, go ahead :-).

Thanks,
Manuel
> > José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
> > Francesco Tombolini
> > Hugo Cisneiros
> > Andrew Martynov
> >
> > Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
> > give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
> > for the bother.
>
> The CLA allows relicensing without asking each and every contributor
> explicit permission. It can be done as a matter of courtesy but its not
> a legal requirement.
>
> Rahul

[Jose Nuno Coelho Pires]

Em Quarta, 31 de Maio de 2006 01:09, o Manuel Ospina escreveu:
> How can I give permission to relicense the document? If it is only to
> give my approval, go ahead :-).

In respect to what concerns me, go ahead! I raise no questions about it :)

Best regards,

Jose Nuno Pires

[Francesco Tombolini]

Alle 02:38, mercoledì 31 maggio 2006, Jose Nuno Coelho Pires ha scritto:
> Em Quarta, 31 de Maio de 2006 01:09, o Manuel Ospina escreveu:
> > How can I give permission to relicense the document? If it is only to
> > give my approval, go ahead :-).
>
> In respect to what concerns me, go ahead! I raise no questions about it :)

I'm aggree too, relicense it without contidions :)

Francesco Tombolini

[Hugo Cisneiros]

On Sunday 28 May 2006 11:33, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> Hi FDPers,

Hau!
> I was looking at the Translation QSG and it appears that it's still
> licensed as GNU FDL.  I show the following contributors to the document:
>
> Manuel Ospina
> José Nuno Coelho Sanarra Pires
> Francesco Tombolini
> Hugo Cisneiros
> Andrew Martynov
>
> Could each of you check in here on fedora-docs-list, and verify that you
> give permission to relicense this document as OPL?  Thank you and sorry
> for the bother.

You have my permission on the translation. Sorry for the delay, now that my 
vacation is over, I'm catching all my "late" mail and pendencies.

BTW, I had translated this document some time ago, and in that time we used to 
translate the .xml directly, not using the potfiles method. Now I am seeing 
that the potfile is missing. Checking older revisions gave me the 
translation-quick-start-guide-pt_BR.xml, so I'll begin to update and get the 
content on the .po file.