FYI...
just an fyi that it looks like zikula (at least the core) is now available in fedora's repos (or will be as soon as mirrors sync)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Koji Build System buildsys@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM Subject: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi To: mikeb@fedoraproject.org, jkeating@fedoraproject.org, notting@fedoraproject.org, katzj@fedoraproject.org, ke4qqq@fedoraproject.org
Package: zikula NVR: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 User: bodhi Status: complete Tag Operation: moved From Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Into Tag: dist-f10-updates
zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules. I have on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing module. At some point, I also have to puppetize the configuration file. After that, we're sorted.
Simon
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-docs-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-docs-list- bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eric H Christensen Sent: 23 March 2009 16:04 To: fedora-docs-list@redhat.com Subject: FW: Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist- f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi Importance: Low
FYI...
just an fyi that it looks like zikula (at least the core) is now available in fedora's repos (or will be as soon as mirrors sync)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Koji Build System buildsys@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM Subject: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi To: mikeb@fedoraproject.org, jkeating@fedoraproject.org, notting@fedoraproject.org, katzj@fedoraproject.org, ke4qqq@fedoraproject.org
Package: zikula NVR: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 User: bodhi Status: complete Tag Operation: moved From Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Into Tag: dist-f10-updates
zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.28/2022 - Release Date: 03/25/09 07:16:00
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Simon Birtwistle simon@zikula.org wrote:
Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules. I have on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing module. At some point, I also have to puppetize the configuration file. After that, we're sorted.
Simon
-----Original Message----- From: fedora-docs-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-docs-list- bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eric H Christensen Sent: 23 March 2009 16:04 To: fedora-docs-list@redhat.com Subject: FW: Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist- f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi Importance: Low
FYI...
just an fyi that it looks like zikula (at least the core) is now available in fedora's repos (or will be as soon as mirrors sync)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Koji Build System buildsys@fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM Subject: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi To: mikeb@fedoraproject.org, jkeating@fedoraproject.org, notting@fedoraproject.org, katzj@fedoraproject.org, ke4qqq@fedoraproject.org
Package: zikula NVR: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 User: bodhi Status: complete Tag Operation: moved From Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Into Tag: dist-f10-updates
zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.28/2022 - Release Date: 03/25/09 07:16:00
-- fedora-docs-list mailing list fedora-docs-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Yes - while I wish we were at this point several weeks ago, I am happy with where we are. Lukas from Zikula has pushed up a package for review. Toshio has agreed to review it and already started working with Lukas on the process. I hope to push up a few modules this weekend as well. I think we are making adequate process, though I feel I am a constraint. Hopefully Lukas will open that up quite a bit.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Simon Birtwistle simon@zikula.org wrote:
Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules. I have on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing module. At some point, I also have to puppetize the configuration file. After that, we're sorted.
Two questions about the Zikula packages:
1. Should Zikula have some sort of SELinux policy module to properly handle /etc/zikula/config.php? I installed the zikula package last night and one of the things I had to change to run the installation was:
su -c 'chcon -t httpd_sys_content_rw_t /etc/zikula/config.php'
If a module can't or shouldn't be provided for some reason, this may be worth a README.fedora in %{_docdir}/zikula. It's not something that will jump out at some readers.
2. Zikula appears to want php-mbstring but that's not in the dependencies. Should it be?
Inline reply
2009/3/25 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Simon Birtwistle simon@zikula.org wrote:
Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules. I have on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing module. At some point, I also have to puppetize the configuration file. After that, we're sorted.
Two questions about the Zikula packages:
- Should Zikula have some sort of SELinux policy module to properly
handle /etc/zikula/config.php? I installed the zikula package last night and one of the things I had to change to run the installation was:
su -c 'chcon -t httpd_sys_content_rw_t /etc/zikula/config.php'
If a module can't or shouldn't be provided for some reason, this may be worth a README.fedora in %{_docdir}/zikula. It's not something that will jump out at some readers.
We have the following logic in a %pre statement that supposedly handles that - however it's been on and off my machines (and herlos) that it's a possibility that it's not sufficient to deal with the issue: semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_var_run_t %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.php || semanage fcontext -m -t httpd_var_run_t %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.php || :
We probably do need to create a policy for it long term.
- Zikula appears to want php-mbstring but that's not in the
dependencies. Should it be?
It is possible that we missed a dependency, I'll take a look shortly.
Thanks for taking a look at this - more eyes are welcome.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Yes - while I wish we were at this point several weeks ago, I am happy with where we are. Lukas from Zikula has pushed up a package for review. Toshio has agreed to review it and already started working with Lukas on the process. I hope to push up a few modules this weekend as well. I think we are making adequate process, though I feel I am a constraint. Hopefully Lukas will open that up quite a bit.
Do you need more help with packaging?
May be some other folks here who would help, even just to get the initial SRPM and spec file together if they don't want to maintain the package.
- Karsten
2009/3/25 Karsten Wade kwade@redhat.com:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Yes - while I wish we were at this point several weeks ago, I am happy with where we are. Lukas from Zikula has pushed up a package for review. Toshio has agreed to review it and already started working with Lukas on the process. I hope to push up a few modules this weekend as well. I think we are making adequate process, though I feel I am a constraint. Hopefully Lukas will open that up quite a bit.
Do you need more help with packaging?
May be some other folks here who would help, even just to get the initial SRPM and spec file together if they don't want to maintain the package.
Absolutely - we have 8 public modules that need to be packaged and at least 1 if not 2 fedora infrastructure specific packages that need to be packaged.
Content Version 3.0.3 - source tagged in SVN here: http://code.zikula.org/content/browser/tags/version-3.0.3 Lukas currently has this one up for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091
CoType Version 1.0.0 - download here: http://www.elfisk.dk/index.php?module=Folder&func=view&mode=folder.v... erid=52 - the source is probably in SVN somewhere, but not sure where.
crpTag I'd take the head: http://code.zikula.org/crptag/browser/trunk, but just in case it is non functional perhaps we could package 0.1.3 too? http://code.zikula.org/crptag/browser/tags/crpTag_0.1.3
MediaAttach SVN Head: http://code.zikula.org/mediaattach/browser/trunk/MediaAttach
mediashare SVN Head: http://code.zikula.org/mediashare/browser/trunk
menutree Version 2.0.1: http://code.zikula.org/bianor/browser/tags/menutree/2.0.1
MultiHook SVN Head: http://code.zikula.org/multihook/browser/trunk/MultiHook
scribite Version 3.1: http://code.zikula.org/scribite/browser/tags/scribite/3.1
Custom Modules (no public source) ============== FASAuth FedoraDocs Static_Docs