FW: Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[Eric Christensen]

FYI...


> just an fyi that it looks like zikula (at least the core) is now
> available in fedora's repos (or will be as soon as mirrors sync)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Koji Build System <buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
> Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM
> Subject: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from
> dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
> To: mikeb(a)fedoraproject.org, jkeating(a)fedoraproject.org,
> notting(a)fedoraproject.org, katzj(a)fedoraproject.org,
> ke4qqq(a)fedoraproject.org
>
>
> Package: zikula
> NVR: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10
> User: bodhi
> Status: complete
> Tag Operation: moved
> From Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate
> Into Tag: dist-f10-updates
>
> zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from
> dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[Simon Birtwistle]

Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules.  I have on my list
completion of the theme, and the publishing module.  At some point, I also have to
puppetize the configuration file.  After that, we're sorted.


Simon

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: fedora-docs-list-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-docs-list-
>  bounces(a)redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eric H Christensen
>  Sent: 23 March 2009 16:04
>  To: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
>  Subject: FW: Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-
>  f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
>  Importance: Low
>  
>  FYI...
>  
>  
>  >just an fyi that it looks like zikula (at least the core) is now
>  >available in fedora's repos (or will be as soon as mirrors sync)
>  >
>  >
>  >---------- Forwarded message ----------
>  >From: Koji Build System <buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  >Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM
>  >Subject: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from
>  >dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
>  >To: mikeb(a)fedoraproject.org, jkeating(a)fedoraproject.org,
>  &gt;notting(a)fedoraproject.org, katzj(a)fedoraproject.org,
>  &gt;ke4qqq(a)fedoraproject.org
>  >
>  >
>  >Package: zikula
>  >NVR: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10
>  >User: bodhi
>  >Status: complete
>  >Tag Operation: moved
>  >From Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate
>  >Into Tag: dist-f10-updates
>  >
>  >zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from
>  >dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
>  
>  --
>  fedora-docs-list mailing list
>  fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe:
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
>  
>  No virus found in this incoming message.
>  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>  Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.28/2022 - Release Date:
>  03/25/09 07:16:00

Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[David Nalley]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Simon Birtwistle <simon(a)zikula.org&gt; wrote:
>  Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules.  I have
> on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing module.  At some point, I also have
> to puppetize the configuration file.  After that, we're sorted.
>
>
>  Simon
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fedora-docs-list-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-docs-list-
> > bounces(a)redhat.com] On Behalf Of Eric H Christensen
> > Sent: 23 March 2009 16:04
> > To: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
> > Subject: FW: Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-
> > f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
> > Importance: Low
> >
> > FYI...
> >
> >
> > >just an fyi that it looks like zikula (at least the core) is now
> > >available in fedora's repos (or will be as soon as mirrors sync)
> > >
> > >
> > >---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > >From: Koji Build System <buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
> > >Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:09 AM
> > >Subject: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from
> > >dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
> > >To: mikeb(a)fedoraproject.org, jkeating(a)fedoraproject.org,
> > &gt;notting(a)fedoraproject.org, katzj(a)fedoraproject.org,
> > &gt;ke4qqq(a)fedoraproject.org
> > >
> > >
> > >Package: zikula
> > >NVR: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10
> > >User: bodhi
> > >Status: complete
> > >Tag Operation: moved
> > >From Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate
> > >Into Tag: dist-f10-updates
> > >
> > >zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from
> > >dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi
> >
> > --
> > fedora-docs-list mailing list
> > fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe:
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.28/2022 - Release Date:
> > 03/25/09 07:16:00
>
>
>  --
>  fedora-docs-list mailing list
>  fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe:
>  https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
>  
Yes - while I wish we were at this point several weeks ago, I am happy
with where we are. Lukas from Zikula has pushed up a package for
review. Toshio has agreed to review it and already started working
with Lukas on the process. I hope to push up a few modules this
weekend as well. I think we are making adequate process, though I feel
I am a constraint. Hopefully Lukas will open that up quite a bit.

Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[Paul W. Frields]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>  On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Simon Birtwistle
> <simon(a)zikula.org&gt; wrote:
>  > Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules.  I
>  > have on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing
>  > module.  At some point, I also have to puppetize the configuration
>  > file.  After that, we're sorted. 
Two questions about the Zikula packages:

1.  Should Zikula have some sort of SELinux policy module to properly
handle /etc/zikula/config.php?  I installed the zikula package last
night and one of the things I had to change to run the installation
was:

su -c 'chcon -t httpd_sys_content_rw_t /etc/zikula/config.php'

If a module can't or shouldn't be provided for some reason, this may
be worth a README.fedora in %{_docdir}/zikula.  It's not something
that will jump out at some readers.

2.  Zikula appears to want php-mbstring but that's not in the
dependencies.  Should it be?

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[David Nalley]

Inline reply

2009/3/25 Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com&gt;:
>  On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Simon Birtwistle <simon(a)zikula.org&gt; wrote:
> > > Lukas on the Zikula team is looking at packaging the modules.  I
> > > have on my list completion of the theme, and the publishing
> > > module.  At some point, I also have to puppetize the configuration
> > > file.  After that, we're sorted.
>
>  Two questions about the Zikula packages:
>
>  1.  Should Zikula have some sort of SELinux policy module to properly
>  handle /etc/zikula/config.php?  I installed the zikula package last
>  night and one of the things I had to change to run the installation
>  was:
>
>  su -c 'chcon -t httpd_sys_content_rw_t /etc/zikula/config.php'
>
>  If a module can't or shouldn't be provided for some reason, this may
>  be worth a README.fedora in %{_docdir}/zikula.  It's not something
>  that will jump out at some readers. 
We have the following logic in a %pre statement that supposedly
handles that - however it's been on and off my machines (and herlos)
that it's a possibility that it's not sufficient to deal with the
issue:
semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_var_run_t
%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.php || semanage fcontext -m -t
httpd_var_run_t %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/config.php || :

We probably do need to create a policy for it long term.


>  2.  Zikula appears to want php-mbstring but that's not in the
>  dependencies.  Should it be? 
It is possible that we missed a dependency, I'll take a look shortly.





Thanks for taking a look at this - more eyes are welcome.

Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[Karsten Wade]

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:

>  Yes - while I wish we were at this point several weeks ago, I am
> happy
>  with where we are. Lukas from Zikula has pushed up a package for
>  review. Toshio has agreed to review it and already started working
>  with Lukas on the process. I hope to push up a few modules this
>  weekend as well. I think we are making adequate process, though I feel
>  I am a constraint. Hopefully Lukas will open that up quite a bit. 
Do you need more help with packaging?

May be some other folks here who would help, even just to get the
initial SRPM and spec file together if they don't want to maintain the
package.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
AD0E0C41

Fwd: zikula-1.1.1-12.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi

[David Nalley]

2009/3/25 Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>  On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:39:54PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > Yes - while I wish we were at this point several weeks ago, I am happy
> > with where we are. Lukas from Zikula has pushed up a package for
> > review. Toshio has agreed to review it and already started working
> > with Lukas on the process. I hope to push up a few modules this
> > weekend as well. I think we are making adequate process, though I feel
> > I am a constraint. Hopefully Lukas will open that up quite a bit.
>
>  Do you need more help with packaging?
>
>  May be some other folks here who would help, even just to get the
>  initial SRPM and spec file together if they don't want to maintain the
>  package. 
Absolutely - we have 8 public modules that need to be packaged and at
least 1 if not 2 fedora infrastructure specific packages that need to
be packaged.

Content
Version 3.0.3 - source tagged in SVN here:
http://code.zikula.org/content/browser/tags/version-3.0.3
Lukas currently has this one up for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091

CoType
Version 1.0.0 - download here:
http://www.elfisk.dk/index.php?module=Folder&func=view&mode=folde...
erid=52 - the source is probably in SVN somewhere, but not sure where.

crpTag
I'd take the head: http://code.zikula.org/crptag/browser/trunk, but just in
case it is non functional perhaps we could package 0.1.3 too?
http://code.zikula.org/crptag/browser/tags/crpTag_0.1.3

MediaAttach
SVN Head: http://code.zikula.org/mediaattach/browser/trunk/MediaAttach

mediashare
SVN Head: http://code.zikula.org/mediashare/browser/trunk

menutree
Version 2.0.1: http://code.zikula.org/bianor/browser/tags/menutree/2.0.1

MultiHook
SVN Head: http://code.zikula.org/multihook/browser/trunk/MultiHook

scribite
Version 3.1: http://code.zikula.org/scribite/browser/tags/scribite/3.1

Custom Modules (no public source)
==============
FASAuth
FedoraDocs
Static_Docs