.NET 5.0 package

[Marcus Wichelmann]

Hi,

as you probably know, .NET 5.0 has been released a few days ago. Do you 
have any plans to provide a Fedora package for it just like you do for 
.NET 3.1 and below?
I find it very useful to have the .NET SDK in the official repos now.

Thank you for your work!

Kind regards,
Marcus Wichelmann

[Radka Gustavsson]

Hi,

it boils down to:
https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/5596

We're unable to build .net5 from source, as soon as work towards that is
done, it will be available in RHEL, CentOS and Fedora. The "work" includes
the completion of:
https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/wiki/Driving-to-zero-prebuilt-depende...

Radka

------------------------------
*Radka Gustavsson - Janeková (she/her)*
.NET Core QE Lead, Red Hat
*[e-mail] *
IRC: radka | Freenode: Rhea

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:21 PM Marcus Wichelmann 
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you probably know, .NET 5.0 has been released a few days ago. Do you
> have any plans to provide a Fedora package for it just like you do for
> .NET 3.1 and below?
> I find it very useful to have the .NET SDK in the official repos now.
>
> Thank you for your work!
>
> Kind regards,
> Marcus Wichelmann
> _______________________________________________
> DotNet SIG mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...

[Michael Cronenworth]

On 11/17/20 8:16 AM, Radka Gustavsson wrote:
> We're unable to build .net5 from source, as soon as work towards that is done, it 
> will be available in RHEL, CentOS and Fedora. The "work" includes the completion 
> of: 
> https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/wiki/Driving-to-zero-prebuilt-depende... 
> https://github.com/dotnet/source-build/wiki/Driving-to-zero-prebuilt-dependencies-in-5.0

It would be nice if upstream considered building from source a requirement rather 
than a nice to have. Any luck talking them into raising the priority of the idea?