2:29 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Bug ID: 1964630
Summary: F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde,
eclipse-platform
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: eclipse
Assignee: mat.booth(a)gmail.com
Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: akurtako(a)redhat.com, andjrobins(a)gmail.com,
dbhole(a)redhat.com, ebaron(a)redhat.com,
eclipse-sig(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jerboaa(a)gmail.com, jjohnstn(a)redhat.com,
lef(a)fedoraproject.org, mat.booth(a)gmail.com,
rgrunber(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 1927313 (F35FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that
this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok(a)redhat.com).
Your package (eclipse) Fails To Install in Fedora 35:
can't install eclipse-jdt:
- nothing provides osgi(org.hamcrest.core) needed by
eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-5.fc35.noarch
can't install eclipse-pde:
- nothing provides osgi(org.objectweb.asm) needed by
eclipse-pde-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
- nothing provides osgi(org.objectweb.asm.tree) needed by
eclipse-pde-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
can't install eclipse-platform:
- nothing provides glassfish-annotation-api needed by
eclipse-platform-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
- nothing provides glassfish-servlet-api >= 3.1.0 needed by
eclipse-platform-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...),
your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.
P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer
than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.
P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple
dependent packages, please consider using side tags:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter...
Thanks!
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1927313
[Bug 1927313] Fedora 35 Fails To install Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:41 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Last Closed| |2021-05-26 10:41:29
--- Comment #1 from Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)gmail.com> ---
Works for me, installing from koji buildroot with "mock -r
fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local --install eclipse-pde"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:04 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Actually, `--enablerepo=local` only adds the Koji buildroot repo, while
outdated rawhide repos are still available. Use `--disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=local` to replicate the Koji buildroot situation:
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=local --install
eclipse-pde
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides osgi(org.objectweb.asm) needed by
eclipse-pde-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
- nothing provides osgi(org.objectweb.asm.tree) needed by
eclipse-pde-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest'
to use
not only best candidate packages)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #3)
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --disablerepo='*'
--enablerepo=local
--install eclipse-jdt
...
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides osgi(org.hamcrest.core) needed by
eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-5.fc35.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest'
to
use not only best candidate packages)
I see, it would have been useful to include reproduction instructions in the
bug you filed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:09 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Yes indeed. I thought the same and adapting the bug template is on my TODO.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(mat.booth(a)gmail.c
| |om)
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello,
This is the first reminder (step 3 from
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...).
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello,
This is the second reminder (step 4 from
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...).
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(mat.booth(a)gmail.c |
|om) |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:31 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(mat.booth(a)gmail.c
| |om)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:32 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sergio(a)serjux.com
--- Comment #8 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
"osgi(org.hamcrest.core)" is hamcrest-core , this maybe happens because
hamcrest2 was retired [1] and hamcrest [2] is now hamcrest-2.2-4.fc35
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hamcrest2
[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hamcrest
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:02 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #9 from Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk(a)redhat.com> ---
It is likely that hamcrest upgrade to version 2 changed OSGi metadata or broke
OSGi provides.
If there are any hamcrest changes needed to fix eclipse, please open a bug
against hamcrest package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:52 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #10 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
Trying help here with some information , yes new hamcrest broke OSGi provides
[1]
but is just need in requires [2] enabling bootstrap and try to build the build
stops on [3]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9222/71609222/build.log
and I guess that fix OSGi provides of hamcrest will not fix the build isn't it
?
[1]
dnf repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rawhide -q hamcrest --provides
hamcrest = 2.2-4.fc35
hamcrest-core = 2.2-4.fc35
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-all:pom:) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core:pom:) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-library) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-library:pom:) = 2.2
mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest:pom:) = 2.2
[2]
-Requires: osgi(org.hamcrest.core)
+Requires: mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core)
[3]
[WARNING] Error initializing:
org.eclipse.tycho.p2.resolver.P2DependencyResolver@7a358613
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Service is not
registered class='interface org.eclipse.tycho.core.shared.ProxyServiceFacade'
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9222/71609222/build.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:29 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #10)
Trying help here with some information , yes new hamcrest broke OSGi
provides [1]
but is just need in requires [2] enabling bootstrap and try to build the
build stops on [3]
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9222/71609222/build.log
and I guess that fix OSGi provides of hamcrest will not fix the build isn't
it ?
[2]
-Requires: osgi(org.hamcrest.core)
+Requires: mvn(org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core)
Change like ^^ will ensure that jar is there but without OSGi metadata it's
useless from Eclipse POV. My team no longer has the manpower to maintain
Eclipse in Fedora so it's up to community to pick it up. Mat is the official
maintainer but he is no longer in the team so I don't know about his plans.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:05 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|mat.booth(a)gmail.com |akurtako(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
This package has changed maintainer in Fedora. Reassigning to the new
maintainer of this component.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4:26 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(mat.booth(a)gmail.c |needinfo?(akurtako(a)redhat.c
|om) |om)
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello,
This is the first reminder (step 3 from
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fai...).
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please
acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to
maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent
packages realize the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:11 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Didik Supriadi <didiksupriadi41(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |didiksupriadi41(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Didik Supriadi <didiksupriadi41(a)gmail.com> ---
Hi,
I'm sorry if I'm wrong but isn't hamcrest version 2.* should be in
"hamcrest2"?
"decathorpe" created it about a year ago, but orphaned it later due to lack of
time.
Probably he's thinking that it's best to differentiate between the two?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
5:12 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #15 from Didik Supriadi <didiksupriadi41(a)gmail.com> ---
link: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hamcrest2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:11 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #16 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
Some information from this thread [1]
According Mikolaj Izdebski
- eclipse can easily remove dependency on jmc.
- Only jmc directly depends on HdrHistogram, nothing else.
- Only jmc directly depends on jmc-core
- Only jmc and jmc-core directly depend on owasp-java-encoder, nothing else.
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/java-devel@lists.fedoraproj...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:11 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Sergio, are you working on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:19 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #19 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #17)
Sergio, are you working on this?
not really, I'm kjust trying understand the problem , now trying build eclipse
on rawhide we got [1] even with bootstrap enabled
jakarta.annotation-api on F35 stopped to provide osgi(jakarta.annotation-api) ,
without any great modification of the spec ...
and eclipse-platform is part of eclipse.src.rpm so this is in loop .
eclipse-ecf-core requires eclipse-platform ( "osgi(org.eclipse.core.net)" )
cbi-plugins requires tycho which requires eclipse-platform, any tip ?
[1]
Error:
Problem 1: package tycho-2.2.0-4.fc34.noarch requires eclipse-platform >=
1:4.17, but none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- nothing provides osgi(jakarta.annotation-api) needed by
eclipse-platform-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
Problem 2: package eclipse-ecf-core-3.14.19-2.fc34.noarch requires
osgi(org.eclipse.core.jobs), but none of the providers can be installed
- package eclipse-ecf-core-3.14.19-2.fc34.noarch requires
osgi(org.eclipse.core.net), but none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- nothing provides osgi(jakarta.annotation-api) needed by
eclipse-platform-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
Problem 3: package cbi-plugins-1.1.7-10.fc35.noarch requires
mvn(org.eclipse.tycho:tycho-core), but none of the providers can be installed
- package tycho-2.2.0-4.fc34.noarch requires eclipse-platform >= 1:4.17, but
none of the providers can be installed
- conflicting requests
- nothing provides osgi(jakarta.annotation-api) needed by
eclipse-platform-1:4.19-5.fc35.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest'
to use
not only best candidate packages)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:27 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #20 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
If somebody plans to actually fix this until Fedora 35 beta freeze, please
assign this buzgilla to you and set ti to ASSIGNED or higher before 2021-08-17,
otherwise this package will be retired. Unretiring it once fixed is possible as
well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:56 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #21 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
I can't build tycho on F35/rawhide bug #1988028 , even if with local build of
maven-install-plugin in buildroot, maven-install-plugin is retired and even if
I enable bootstrap in tycho , also readd bnd-maven-plugin-5.2.0 in buildroot
doesn't solve .
error in tycho is similar when we try to eclipse [1]
ah about the tip, seems we need build tycho with bootstrap , after eclipse with
bootstrap, after tycho without bootstrap and finally eclipse without bootstrap.
But I don't see way to solve this , I give up .
[1]
[WARNING] Error initializing:
org.eclipse.tycho.p2.resolver.P2DependencyResolver@443a06ad
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Service is not
registered class='interface org.eclipse.tycho.core.shared.ProxyServiceFacade'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:59 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #22 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
This package has been orphaned.
You can pick it up at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse by clicking
button "Take". If nobody picks it up, it will be retired and removed from a
distribution.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:03 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|akurtako(a)redhat.com |extras-orphan@fedoraproject
| |.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:33 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |awilliam(a)redhat.com
Depends On| |1987435
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987435
[Bug 1987435] eclipse: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:34 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #23 from Adam Williamson <awilliam(a)redhat.com> ---
note, this breaks the Scientific_KDE spin, because it tries to pull in various
of these eclipse subpackages which fail to install.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:36 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(akurtako(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Last Closed|2021-05-26 10:41:29 |2021-08-18 08:28:15
--- Comment #24 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Automation has figured out the package is retired in Fedora 35.
If you like it to be unretired, please open a ticket at
https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:28 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Bug 1964630 depends on bug 1987435, which changed state.
Bug 1987435 Summary: eclipse: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1987435
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:40 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #25 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
what are the packages that are F35FailsToInstall now with this retirement ,
isn't all java stack ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:45 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #26 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
Packages that needed eclipse to install already failed to install because
eclipse did not install, so there should be no much changed. Anyway, after the
package is blocked in koji, new bugzillas will be reported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:57 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mat.booth(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #27 from Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)gmail.com> ---
Sergio, I will still keep ecj and jgit alive because other non-eclipse packages
use them, and they are quite small and easy to maintain.
Only packages named eclipse-* should be failing. No other packages should have
eclipse as part of their build process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:54 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #28 from Sergio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
Created attachment 1815214
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1815214&action=edit
reults of retire of eclipse
eclips-swt is installed on my vm with F35 and the deps on
mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) will remove java-1.8.0-openjdk which will remove maven
...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11:47 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1964630] F35FailsToInstall: eclipse-jdt, eclipse-pde, eclipse-platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964630
--- Comment #29 from Mat Booth <mat.booth(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #28)
Created attachment 1815214 [details]
reults of retire of eclipse
eclips-swt is installed on my vm with F35 and the deps on
mvn(org.eclipse.swt:swt) will remove java-1.8.0-openjdk which will remove
maven ...
Did you inspect the dep chain? It's probably only openjfx that needs fixing.
File a bug against openjfx package to drop support for SWT.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1043
days inactive
1128
days old
eclipse-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
33 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com