September 2009 - electronic-lab - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #47: gerbv-2.3.0-1 png failed to open

by fedora-badges

#47: gerbv-2.3.0-1 png failed to open ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: PCB Layout | Version: devel Keywords: | ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- I believe that the PNG files under /usr/share/doc/gerbv-2.3.0/example/thermal in the gerbv-2.3.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm package have been corrupted during the packaging process. The same PNG files in the upstream gerbv-2.3.0.tar.gz tarball are fine. With eog: Could not load image 'dsp.png'. Fatal error reading PNG image file: PNG file corrupted by ASCII conversion Could not load image 'bpB.png'. Fatal error reading PNG image file: PNG file corrupted by ASCII conversion With firefox: The image “file:///usr/share/doc/gerbv-2.3.0/example/thermal/bpB.png” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. The image “file:///usr/share/doc/gerbv-2.3.0/example/thermal/dsp.png” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/47> Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab> Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

14 years, 7 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] spin maintainer's requirement for the website

by Chitlesh GOORAH

Hello Design Team, Since there are a lot of information and mockups about how to get to the new spin website, but not about the layout of the spin website itself. I want to share with you some of my needs as a spin maintainer for FEL, which I believe might be for other spin maintainers. Before I get started, I want to emphasize that FEL's website should look as professional as possible. This is because I want to give those companies that are willing to collaborate with us the feeling that FEL is a mature platform and they can trust us with their contribution and time. That said, there are 4 important aspects what the website should convey: * information for upstream 20% : showing them how their software is being treated and what they are missing if their software is not part of our collection * information for users 30%: basic things : download urls, who are we behind the spin, some screenshots of the software, future events, event slides, photos on events reflecting our maturity, spin's portfolio, Main highlights of the tools, history of the spin (helps the user to choose F-n or F-n+1), spin achievements in real life * information for our contributors 10% : slides templates, our spin fedora hosted website, its tickets, next event, a place to post their publications, developer section * spin portfolio 40%: this is the most important part: It reflects all the key features of all the software under the spin's umbrella and not only copy-paste description of the software. It is accompanied by screenshots, and different solutions for usage. If these 4 aspects are respected, do marketing for the spin should not be difficult (by anyone, even those who have no clue what the spin does). The contents of the four items will be produced by the spin's team and not design team. I would however request that the template being prepared for the spin be less geeky and less crowdy by unnecessary artwork such as gradients etc. As far as I am concerned, Shakthi and I are pushing hard with so that FEL's opensource solutions meet real life user requirements. Our spin technical niche obliges us to opt for a template which tags us as a leader in our field and a EDA distributor such as these: http://www.synopsys.com/home.aspx http://www.mentor.com/ http://www.cadence.com/us/pages/default.aspx I don't know how much time you have allocated to the spin website design, however I have once designed FEL's old page based on Mairin's mockup (F-8 to F-10 timeframe) http://fedorapeople.org/groups/designteam/Projects/Fedora%20Spins/Wirefra... I have migrated (during F-10 timeframe) FEL's website contents on JohnPalmeri's initial moksha like fedora community webpage: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/ I have tweaked it from right-to left so that all the pages can be viewed from _any_ browser. It is important that the spin website can also be viewed under Internet Explorer as well, because some corporate companies especially the managers, marketers and CEOs run windows and they are the ones to seduce for ensure mass deployment of FEL. I would encourage you guys (especially for the spin website : MYSPIN.fedoraproject.org) to opt a template similar to FEL'S website and improve it. It is clean and easy to get contents in without being a web designer. I'm looking forward to be a beta user of the new website. Cheers, Chitlesh

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #30: Paradigm Works Distributes ReleaseWorks As Free, Open Source Software

by fedora-badges

#30: Paradigm Works Distributes ReleaseWorks As Free, Open Source Software ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 Component: FEL | Version: devel Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- To package for Fedora, and learn how to integrate it within the existing flows -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/30> Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab> Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

14 years, 7 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] html file to help SysAdmin choose CentOS or FEL

by Chitlesh GOORAH

Hello there, I have setup up a basic html page listing all FEL packages and their versions with respect to Fedora and CentOS. The reason behind this is to help a friend of mine choose where CentOS or Fedora is appropriate for his analog and characterisation team. Hence I've setup this page which I hope will migrate to our new website, currently under design by Fedora Design Team. The choice of Fedora or CentOS depends on the features and bug fixes on the EDA tools. But at the same time (Since we maintain those FEL packages for EPEL-5 repository), this html will also reflect the critical path in packaging for a particular design flow and which packages really needs to be updated or rebuilt. http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL/list.html It was also once asked to publish a list of FEL packages. Well maintenance of that list is a blocker. This HTML generated automatically solves this issue. I've uploaded the sources of the scripts to our FEL git repository, however if someone can improve them it would be great :) This html file already provides enough qualitative information that satisfies many fields.From Spin maintainer to Ambassador. regards, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Call: Release Notes & groupinstall 'Electronic Lab' packages

by Chitlesh GOORAH

Hello there, We will enter F-12's Feature freeze and String freeze soon. I want * your notes to be included in Fedora 12's release notes. Please forward it to me as soon as possible as the Fedora Translation team requires enough time to translate it. * you to verify if the packages you maintain for electronics is listed on repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide -gl electronic-lab | sort All the names of the packages listed by its output , will be included into FEL's LiveDVD and available under yum groupinstall 'Electronic Lab' Cheers, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #35: alliance 64 stability

by fedora-badges

#35: alliance 64 stability ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: chitlesh Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine' Component: digital design | Version: devel Keywords: alliance | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Alliance suffers stability issues on 64 bits architecture. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/35> Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab> Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

14 years, 7 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] call for testing : gspiceui versus wxGTK 2.8

by Chitlesh GOORAH

Hello there, This is another call for testing. In response to ,[Bug 512076] Build with wxGTK-devel not compat-wxGTK26-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512076 gspiceui is now compiled under wxGTK 2.8 instead of the old wxGTK 2.6. Please kindly test and report any bug so that we can qualify gspiceui for FEL-12 livedvd. F-11 gspiceui package http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130411 I would appreciate if from time to time you do # yum groupupdate 'Electronic Lab' --enablerepo=updates-testing kind regards, Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/FEL

14 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-electronic-lab] geda 1.5.4 test packages

by Chitlesh GOORAH

Hello there, gEDA-gaf's upstream will from now on produce one-big tarball instead of individual tarballs as it used to do in the past. This affects fedora's geda packages and packaging process. In accordance to Fedora packaging process the following tasks ought to be made: * file a new package review for gEDA-gaf * obsolete all existing fedora geda packages The challenge here is how to get users update their system flawlessly. I have produced test packages which I sincerely hope to receive some feedbacks as this will dictate the time taken before the next update will hit the stable repositories. For Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 users, please add to following to /etc/yum.repos.d/gedatest.repo # -------------- [gedatest] name=gEDA test - $releasever baseurl=http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/gEDA/$releasever enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 # -------------- for fedora 10 users with: * 32 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.i386 --enablerepo=gedatest * 64 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.x86_64 --enablerepo=gedatest for fedora 11 users with: * 32 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.i586 --enablerepo=gedatest * 64 bit machines : yum install gEDA-gaf.x86_64 --enablerepo=gedatest Looking forward for some feedbacks Cheers, Chitlesh

14 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

electronic-lab September 2009