[Fedora-electronic-lab] [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  chitlesh 
     Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
 Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
 Keywords:                 |  
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
 Found a nice simple-but-handy tool for working with digital multimeters,
 thought it belongs to FEL.

 http://www.mtoussaint.de/qtdmm.html

 Spec file for latest version here: http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/qtdmm.spec

 Would be nice somebody to pick this package; won't require lots of
 maintainance since the project is mature and slowly evolving; latest
 version was released Dec 2007.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  chitlesh 
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by chitlesh):

 Hello Zap,

 can you help us maintain it ?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:1>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  chitlesh 
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by sherry151):

 I have modified the provided spec file to be in conformity with the Fedora
 packaging guidelines and attached it here.
 Here is the SRPM that I built:
 http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc10.src.rpm

 If Zap permits, I can take up the task of maintaining the package.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:2>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  chitlesh 
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by zap):

 Oops, chitlesh already hired me ;-) He told me what to do, I fixed the
 packaging stuff to stick to Fedora guidelines, returned here, and ... just
 oops ;-)

 Still, after looking at your .spec file I think mine is better because:
  * Mine generates a proper debuginfo rpm
  * Mine doesn't need repackaging the author's tarball to get the directory
 name right
  * Mine includes a rewritten .desktop file which is a bit more descriptive
 than author's

 ;-) I'm sorry for the confusion, but I'll try to maintain this rpm
 mylself.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:3>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  chitlesh 
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by zap):

 Just in case, the src.rpm is available here:

 http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.zap.src.rpm

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:4>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  chitlesh 
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by sherry151):

 No problem here. You can maintain this package.

 There are some problems I found with the spec file

 #1 rpmlint qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.zap.src.rpm

 qtdmm.src:11: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Radek
 qtdmm.src:27: W: setup-not-quiet
 qtdmm.src:46: E: files-attr-not-set
 qtdmm.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Digital multimeter readout software.
 qtdmm.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
 qtdmm.src: W: invalid-license GPL

 Doing a rpmlint on src rpm gives 5 warnings and 1 error

 To resolve the warnings do the following:

 1) Remove the 'Packager' tag
 2) Package summary should not end with a full stop.
 3) Changelog should have a release version (Note 0.8.12-1)

         * Sat Jun  6 2009 Andrew Zabolotny <zap(a)homelink.ru&gt;
     54  - updated to latest version - 0.8.12-1
     55  - Fedora packaging guidelines

 Also since this is the first Fedora package, I think you can remove the
 other changelogs and add 'First Fedora Package' to the latest changelog.

 4) The license should be 'GPLv2+' This is mentioned in the website.

 To resolve the error:

 1) Change the section

 %files
 46      %doc README AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING
 47      %defattr(-,root,root)
 48      %{_bindir}/qtdmm

 to

 %files
 46      %defattr(-,root,root)
 47      %doc README AUTHORS CHANGELOG COPYING
 48      %{_bindir}/qtdmm

 #2 The install process does not preserve time stamps. Add '-p' after every
 install command. For exaple:
    35   install -p -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}

 #3 Install the man file. To do this you can add these lines in %install
 section

 install -p -d  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
 install -p -m 644 qtdmm.1 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1

 and add the following line to the %files section

 %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz

 #4 I believe you should remove the 'Vendor' tag

 #5 Version of qt-devel need not be mentioned. qt3-devel should be qt-
 devel. The package builds quite perfectly with qt4-devel as well.

 #6 'Requires qt' is not required as qt-devel will always pull qt. If a
 system has qt-devel in it it will always have qt in it.

 #7 Generally 'Name' should come first followed by 'Version'. Also, the
 summary should be clear like 'A digital multimeter readout software'.

 Well that's almost all of it. Others please correct me if I have gone
 wrong somewhere.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:5>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Changes (by chitlesh):

  * owner:  chitlesh => sherry151

Comment:

 @Zap,

 your spec file needs a lot of work. It seems to me that it comes from suse
 or mandriva as it is not compatible with Fedora packaging guidelines.

 I recommend you to follow sherry's spec as example especially the sequence
 of the Name, Version, Release upto the description.
 https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-
 lab/attachment/ticket/23/qtdmm.spec

 This is the most important part and the first thing reviewers look at. All
 fedora spec files should follow the same template.

 Update your spec file accordingly. Beautiful spec files attract more
 reviewers and the quicker the package will be approved.

 Also for Fedora Electronic Lab we have a special menu structure for
 desktop files provided by electronics-menu. See sherry's spec file for
 more details.

 As for your new desktop file, it should be in the form of a patch. The
 reason behind this is that fedora is upstream oriented and as a packager
 your changes or modifications should be sent to upstream. Hence you can
 send your patches and [[BR]]
 1) upstream will add your name in their changelog[[BR]]
 2) you don't need to fix the spec file again, but just remove the
 patch.[[BR]]
 3) it make review process easy to understand your modifications[[BR]]

 @sherry

 I appreciate you are getting involved in the reviewing process as well. It
 helps you gain experience quietly. And also in the future, I will need you
 to review my packages :)

 As for your spec file, whenever you base your spec file from other, append
 the changelog and not clean it. This helps to understand difference
 decisions taken in the past.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:6>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by zap):

 sherry151, thanks very much for review! Especially for the rpmlint hint,
 this seems a nice tool to avoid childish packaging problems.

 I have fixed almost all mentioned problems and will upload the spec file
 shortly.

 Also I've updated the src.rpm here:
 http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.zap.src.rpm

 Only a few objections:

  * Still I would like to keep the older changelog to credit the original
 spec file author. This is imho a matter of fairness, but if you insist I
 will remove it.
  * qtdmm does not compile with qt 4. There are lots of problems and I'm
 not a qt expert to solve them. Perhaps you had installed both qt-devel and
 qt3-devel, that's what misleaded you.
  * 'Requires qt3' is needed because it's a bit of difference between
 Requires and Build-Requires.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:7>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by chitlesh):

 Replying to [comment:7 zap]:
>  sherry151, thanks very much for review! Especially for the rpmlint
> hint, 
 this seems a nice tool to avoid childish packaging problems.
>  I have fixed almost all mentioned problems and will upload the spec file 
 shortly.
>  Also I've updated the src.rpm here:
>  http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.zap.src.rpm
>
>  Only a few objections:
>
>   * Still I would like to keep the older changelog to credit the original 
 spec file
author. This is imho a matter of fairness, but if you insist I
 will remove it.

 I said above they should be kept.

>   * 'Requires qt3' is needed because it's a bit of
> difference between 
 Requires and Build-Requires.



 #1: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ‘char*’[[BR]]
 can you patch this ?

 #2: fix the desktop-file-install, see sherry's spec so that the desktop
 file gets into the Electronic section.

 #3: changelog adopt the same changelog style as sherry did. The version-
 release at the end of the line + an empty line in between two changelog
 entry.

 #4: same, add empty lines to separate different blocks of the spec.
 Although this is not critical for the package, it makes the spec file hard
 to read without spending too much time. See sherry's spec again or my spec
 file on http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:8>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  new      
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by zap):

 Okay, here goes another iteration of the spec file :)

 Replying to [comment:8 chitlesh]:
>  #1: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to
> ‘char*’[[BR]]
>  can you patch this ? 
 done.

>  #2: fix the desktop-file-install, see sherry's spec so that the
> desktop 
 file gets into the Electronic section.
 my older spec included a direct patch for .desktop file to place it in the
 Electronics section, but indeed it's better to do this at %install time.

>  #3: changelog adopt the same changelog style as sherry did. The
> version- 
 release at the end of the line + an empty line in between two changelog
 entry.
 Ah, I was looking at the wrong .spec file and didn't see that. Fixed.

>  #4: same, add empty lines to separate different blocks of the spec.
 Hmm, my .spec files always separates blocks from each other with a empty
 line. I don't see what I can fix here?

 As always, latest .src.rpm here:
 http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.zap.src.rpm

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:9>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Changes (by sherry151):

  * status:  new => assigned

Comment:

 Good work there zap. But there are a few things I would like to point out.

 # 1: Do you really need a .desktop patch because when I built qtdmm on my
 system, the existing .desktop in the source worked fine with the desktop-
 file-install in the %install section. Please check it and if the patch is
 not required, please remove it.

 # 2: Why is the srpm has packager name in its name. How are you building
 it? Your spec file does not show any packager tag and when I used it to
 build on my system, there was no packager name in the srpm name. Please
 make sure that you are using the correct spec file. Also, please abide by
 the Fedora package naming guidelines.
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

 # 3: Increase the release number every time you make some changes after a
 review. That will help track the changes easily.

 # 4: By separating blocks with an empty line what Chitlesh meant was that
 you should seperate the various logical blocks like the 'Name, Version,
 Release, Summary' and 'License,URL,Source0' etc. Also it might be a good
 practice to keep the various tags in vertical alignment. Use tab for this.
 I have reformatted your latest spec file for your understanding. I am
 uploading it here as an attachment. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-
 electronic-lab/attachment/ticket/23/qtdmm.5.spec

 Keep up the good work. Also the spec file is almost ready. You cn go ahead
 and file a review request for this package. Follow this guide
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_...
 . Also go through this
 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join . Once you have
 submitted the review request, paste the link to the bug here.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:10>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by zap):

 1. If you would look at the .desktop patch you would see why I did it :)
 it will:
    1. Change the name in menu from QtDMM to Digital Multimeter
    1. Add a description for the menu item (it will show as a tooltip if
 you keep the mouse pointer over the menu item for some time)
    1. Adds translation to Russian for the program name and description
    1. Changes icon name from /usr/share/pixmaps/qtdmm.png to simply qtdmm
 - there's no need for a fully-qualified file name, and it's prone to
 errors
  1. The .srpm has a packager name in it just because I have "%dist
 .fc9.zap" in my ~/.rpmmacros. Of course, the final version will be
 renamed, it's just for my convenience to differentiate src.rpms. Anyway
 the final .src.rpm will be rebuilt by somebody/something, or am I wrong?
  1. Fine
  1. ok about empty line separators, although I have split it in three
 blocks by sense - first block: package description, second: package
 source; third: build information. About indentions - I don't like it at
 all, and all Fedora packages I have seen don't use indentions, so
 indenting will make our RPMs inconsistent with mainline. Once long time
 ago I also was indenting everything like that but dropped this practice
 for several reasons.

 On the wiki there's a line:
 "Make sure that you mention in the 'Review Description' field that this is
 your first package, and you are seeking a sponsor"

 do I have to do this, or I have already passed the review process?

 The latest src.rpm (without .zap):
 http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.src.rpm

 The latest .spec will be attached shortly.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:11>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by sherry151):

 Replying to [comment:11 zap]:
>   1. If you would look at the .desktop patch you would see why I did
> it 
 :) it will:
>     1. Change the name in menu from QtDMM to Digital Multimeter
>     1. Add a description for the menu item (it will show as a tooltip if 
 you keep
the mouse pointer over the menu item for some time)
>     1. Adds translation to Russian for the program name and
> description
>     1. Changes icon name from /usr/share/pixmaps/qtdmm.png to simply 
 qtdmm -
there's no need for a fully-qualified file name, and it's prone to
 errors

 That's fine. But do not forget to send the patches upstream.

>   1. The .srpm has a packager name in it just because I have
> "%dist 
 .fc9.zap" in my ~/.rpmmacros. Of course, the final version will
be
 renamed, it's just for my convenience to differentiate src.rpms. Anyway
 the final .src.rpm will be rebuilt by somebody/something, or am I wrong?

 Understood and yes you are right, the final package will be built by the
 [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingKoji koji] build
 system.

>   1. ok about empty line separators, although I have split it in three
 blocks by sense - first block: package description, second: package
 source; third: build information. About indentions - I don't like it at
 all, and all Fedora packages I have seen don't use indentions, so
 indenting will make our RPMs inconsistent with mainline. Once long time
 ago I also was indenting everything like that but dropped this practice
 for several reasons.

 No problem. You can stick to whatever seems good to you but make sure that
 the spec file is legible.

>  On the wiki there's a line:
>  "Make sure that you mention in the 'Review Description' field that this
 is your first package, and you are seeking a sponsor"
>  do I have to do this, or I have already passed the review process? 
 Yes you do if you are not already a Fedora package maintainer. The review
 done here is unofficial review and the actual fedora review process has to
 be passed. Create a [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/new
 FAS] account  and sign the CLA. Then apply the CLA and apply for the
 Fedora Package Maintainers group. File a review request in bugzilla as
 told earlier and do not forget to set the FE_NEEDSPONSOR in the Blocks
 section. Then paste the review link here and official review and
 sponsoring will be done.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:12>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by chitlesh):

 I think it is time to file an official package review.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:13>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by sherry151):

 Hi Zap

 Please file a review request for the package. Only then can it be approved
 and pushed to the repository. If have are having any trouble with it
 please let us know. We will try to help.

 Regards

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:14>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151
      Type:  task           |      Status:  assigned 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel    
Resolution:                 |    Keywords:           
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment (by chitlesh):

 being reviewed at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:15>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.

[Fedora-electronic-lab] Re: [Fedora Electronic Lab] #23: Package qtdmm

[fedora-badges]

#23: Package qtdmm
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  zap            |       Owner:  sherry151              
      Type:  task           |      Status:  closed                 
  Priority:  minor          |   Milestone:  Fedora 12 'Constantine'
 Component:  analog design  |     Version:  devel                  
Resolution:  fixed          |    Keywords:                         
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Changes (by chitlesh):

  * status:  assigned => closed
  * resolution:  => fixed

Comment:

 Approved and waiting for packager to commit to Fedora CVS and build on
 koji.

 Closing

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23#comment:16>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.