In one week, 2025-05-18, or slightly later, I plan to update the uv
package from 0.6.17 to 0.7.3 or a later 0.7.x release[1] in Fedora
Rawhide, 42, and 41. (Fedora 40 will have reached its end-of-life by
then.) I also plan to ship the same update to the EPEL10 leading branch,
currently EPEL 10.1.
In upstream’s words, “This release contains various changes that improve
correctness and user experience, but could break some workflows; many
changes have been marked as breaking out of an abundance of caution. We
expect most users to be able to upgrade without making changes.” The
exact changes are documented in the release notes for 0.7.0[2].
For stable releases Fedora 42 and 41, this update is permitted under a
permanent exception to the Updates Policy[3]; for the EPEL10 leading
branch, it is permitted under a semi-permanent exception for versions up
to 1.0[4]. For EPEL “stable” branches (epel10.0), current policy does
not allow SemVer-breaking updates of uv or of the library-only Rust
packages upon which it depends, so uv 0.6.17[5] will be the final uv
release in EPEL10.0 for the foreseeable future.
Four packages in Fedora now depend on uv: fawltydeps, hatch,
python-build, and python-tox-uv. A quick impact check using local mock
builds did not reveal any incompatibilities. Additionally, a new
dependency from translate-toolkit was found to be spurious, and I opened
a PR to remove it[6].
I will also update python-uv-build[7], the new uv-based build backend,
to the same version as uv. This package is still Rawhide-only for now.
As long as nothing yet depends on it, I prefer to allow a little time
for the ecosystem to work out any kinks before locking us into a
particular minor release in stable branches.
– Ben Beasley (FAS: music)
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uv/pull-request/54
[2] https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/releases/tag/0.7.0
[3] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3262
[4] https://pagure.io/epel/issue/317#comment-958123
[5] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-445cab085a
[6] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/translate-toolkit/pull-request/13
[7] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-uv-build/pull-request/6
The update contains a soname bump but no known breaking changes - but many
bug fixes. I've not found anything in EPEL that relies on or builds
against netplan.
In its current state, netplan in EPEL9 is pretty unmaintainable as upstream
has diverged (and matured) a lot since the release we're on (0.105). In
order to get it to a more maintainable state I'd like to get it updated to
the current release (1.1.2). netplan moves much slower these days and it's
a much more mature project and this update should set us up well for the
rest of the EL9 lifecycle.
I'll push this to stable next week per the incompatible updates policy
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-incompatible-upgrades…>
.
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux OS Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
In one week, 2025-07-29, or slightly later, I plan to update the uv
package from 0.7.22 to 0.8.0 or a later 0.8.x release[1] in Fedora
Rawhide, 42, and 41. I also plan to ship the same update to the EPEL10
leading branch, currently EPEL 10.1.
In upstream’s words, “Since we released uv 0.7.0 in April, we've
accumulated various changes that improve correctness and user
experience, but could break some workflows. This release contains those
changes; many have been marked as breaking out of an abundance of
caution. We expect most users to be able to upgrade without making
changes.” The exact changes are documented in the release notes for
0.8.0[2].
For stable releases Fedora 42 and 41, this update is permitted under a
permanent exception to the Updates Policy[3]; for the EPEL10 leading
branch, it is permitted under a semi-permanent exception for versions up
to 1.0[4]. For EPEL “stable” branches (epel10.0), current policy does
not allow SemVer-breaking updates of uv or of the library-only Rust
packages upon which it depends, so uv 0.6.17 will continue to be the
final uv release in EPEL10.0 for the foreseeable future.
Four packages in Fedora now depend on uv: fawltydeps, hatch,
python-build, and python-tox-uv. A quick impact check using local mock
builds did not reveal any incompatibilities.
I will also update python-uv-build[5], the new uv-based build backend,
to the same version as uv. This package is still Rawhide-only for now.
As long as nothing yet depends on it, I prefer to allow a little time
for the ecosystem to work out any kinks before locking us into a
particular minor release in stable branches.
– Ben Beasley (FAS: music)
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uv/pull-request/67
[2] https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/releases/tag/0.8.0
[3] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3262
[4] https://pagure.io/epel/issue/317#comment-958123
[5] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-uv-build/pull-request/6