Re: Major version upgrades - acceptable if in number only?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:04:18PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>  On 20 January 2012 11:12, Russell Golden
> <niveusluna(a)www.niveusluna.org&gt; wrote:
>  > I maintain mozilla-https-everywhere, and upstream is going to release
>  > version 2.0 soon. I hope. Anyway. If 2.0's only changes are new
>  > supported sites, would it be acceptable to push it to EPEL, or should
>  > I just use the repo I already have on repos.fedorapeople.org? If
>  > indeed the only change is new rulesets, backporting would make the
>  > resulting package 1.x in name only.
>  
>  I think this would be ok.
>   
+1