On 25 June 2014 11:27, Michael Stahnke <stahnma(a)puppetlabs.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
> ok, not much discussion here, but it seems like everyone is ok with
> just saying rhel-extras is something we don't conflict with.
>
One question I have is how long this decision is valid for. Right now, I
think the proposal is the best decision. 3 years from now, we may have
different opinions. 7 years from now, we really might. Does this decision
last the 10 years that RHEL does or can we revisit at some point, if
required?
Good question.. and leads into my next email about EPEL.next... what do
people see as the challenges and future of EPEL.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.